Platelet-rich Plasma for the Management of Burn Wound: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5
He Yi, Ruijue Li, Cuixian Li
{"title":"Platelet-rich Plasma for the Management of Burn Wound: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"He Yi, Ruijue Li, Cuixian Li","doi":"10.1177/15347346251359067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimsBurn injuries cause significant mortality, morbidity, and financial and psychological burdens for patients and families. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown some benefits in burn wound healing, but its efficacy is unproven. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate PRP's effects on burn wounds.MethodA comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted until January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP's effect on burn wounds. The mean difference (MD), standardized MD (SMD), or odds ratio (OR) of the studies was calculated.ResultsNine RCTs with 413 participants were included. PRP significantly reduced wound healing time (MD: -6.68 days, 95% CI (-10.96, -2.39)), wound infection incidence (OR: 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.88)), and dressing change frequency (MD: -14.50 times, 95% CI (-16.45, -12.55)). There was a significant increase in the healed area percentage in the intervention group (MD: 6.82%, 95% CI (2.58, 11.06)). However, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in pain score or graft take percentage.ConclusionsThis review shows that PRP enhances wound healing and reduces adverse events like wound infection in burn patients. Future studies should further explore PRP's effects to support its broader clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346251359067"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346251359067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsBurn injuries cause significant mortality, morbidity, and financial and psychological burdens for patients and families. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown some benefits in burn wound healing, but its efficacy is unproven. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate PRP's effects on burn wounds.MethodA comprehensive search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted until January 22, 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP's effect on burn wounds. The mean difference (MD), standardized MD (SMD), or odds ratio (OR) of the studies was calculated.ResultsNine RCTs with 413 participants were included. PRP significantly reduced wound healing time (MD: -6.68 days, 95% CI (-10.96, -2.39)), wound infection incidence (OR: 0.18, 95% CI (0.04, 0.88)), and dressing change frequency (MD: -14.50 times, 95% CI (-16.45, -12.55)). There was a significant increase in the healed area percentage in the intervention group (MD: 6.82%, 95% CI (2.58, 11.06)). However, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in pain score or graft take percentage.ConclusionsThis review shows that PRP enhances wound healing and reduces adverse events like wound infection in burn patients. Future studies should further explore PRP's effects to support its broader clinical use.

富血小板血浆治疗烧伤创面:荟萃分析。
目的烧伤造成严重的死亡率、发病率,并给患者和家属带来经济和心理负担。富血小板血浆(PRP)在烧伤创面愈合中显示出一些益处,但其功效尚未得到证实。本荟萃分析旨在评估PRP对烧伤创面的影响。方法综合检索Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library,检索PRP对烧伤创面影响的随机对照试验(rct),检索截止至2025年1月22日。计算研究的平均差(MD)、标准化平均差(SMD)或比值比(or)。结果纳入9项随机对照试验,共纳入413名受试者。PRP显著减少了伤口愈合时间(MD: -6.68天,95% CI(-10.96, -2.39))、伤口感染发生率(OR: 0.18, 95% CI(0.04, 0.88))和换药频率(MD: -14.50次,95% CI(-16.45, -12.55))。干预组愈合面积百分比显著增加(MD: 6.82%, 95% CI(2.58, 11.06))。然而,干预组与对照组在疼痛评分和移植物采用率方面无显著差异。结论PRP能促进烧伤患者创面愈合,减少创面感染等不良事件的发生。未来的研究应进一步探索PRP的作用,以支持其更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信