发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Leveraging infodemiologists to counteract online misinformation: Experience with COVID-19 vaccines 利用信息流行病学家抵制在线错误信息:COVID-19疫苗的经验
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2022-01-16 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-92
J. Gorman, D. Scales
{"title":"Leveraging infodemiologists to counteract online misinformation: Experience with COVID-19 vaccines","authors":"J. Gorman, D. Scales","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-92","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-92","url":null,"abstract":"In the new information environment represented by the internet and social media platforms, information of public health importance is transmitted rapidly by decentralized, interpersonal networks rather than through traditional sources like public health officials or professional journalists, thus requiring a new approach to counteracting misinformation. We have previously advanced the idea that infodemiology, when combined with effective surveillance and diagnostics, can be an effective method for rapidly addressing online misinformation about science and health. Based on our experience with an infodemiology program aimed at misinformation about COVID-19 vaccinations, we can now offer general recommendations for more widespread training and deployment of infodemiologists who can rapidly respond in situations of high scientific uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46522143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Chinese state media Facebook ads are linked to changes in news coverage of China worldwide 中国官方媒体Facebook的广告与全球对中国新闻报道的变化有关
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-88
Arjun M. Tambe, T. Friedman
{"title":"Chinese state media Facebook ads are linked to changes in news coverage of China worldwide","authors":"Arjun M. Tambe, T. Friedman","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-88","url":null,"abstract":"We studied the relationship between Facebook advertisements from Chinese state media on the global media environment by examining the link between advertisements and online news coverage of China by other countries. We found that countries that see a large increase in views of Facebook advertisement from Chinese state media also see news coverage of China become more positive. News coverage also becomes more likely to use keywords that suggest a point of view favorable to China. One possible explanation is that by drawing greater attention to the issues emphasized by Chinese state media, the advertisements help Chinese state media set the news agenda covered by other media sources.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69804846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Retraction note to: Disinformation creep: ADOS and the strategic weaponization of breaking news 撤回说明：虚假信息蔓延：ADOS与突发新闻的战略武器化
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-86
{"title":"Retraction note to: Disinformation creep: ADOS and the strategic weaponization of breaking news","authors":"","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-86","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-86","url":null,"abstract":"The HKS Misinformation Review retracts the article “Disinformation creep: ADOS and the strategic weaponization of breaking news” (https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-52), which was published in the journal on January 18, 2021.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48507225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research note: Lies and presidential debates: How political misinformation spread across media streams during the 2020 election 研究报告：谎言和总统辩论：2020年大选期间政治错误信息如何在媒体流中传播
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-84
Jaren Haber, Lisa Singh, Ceren Budak, Josh Pasek, Meena Balan, Ryan Callahan, Rob Churchill, Brandon Herren, Kornraphop Kawintiranon
{"title":"Research note: Lies and presidential debates: How political misinformation spread across media streams during the 2020 election","authors":"Jaren Haber, Lisa Singh, Ceren Budak, Josh Pasek, Meena Balan, Ryan Callahan, Rob Churchill, Brandon Herren, Kornraphop Kawintiranon","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-84","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-84","url":null,"abstract":"When U.S. presidential candidates misrepresent the facts, their claims get discussed across media streams, creating a lasting public impression. We show this through a public performance: the 2020 presidential debates. For every five newspaper articles related to the presidential candidates, President Donald J. Trump and Joseph R. Biden Jr., there was one mention of a misinformation-related topic advanced during the debates. Personal attacks on Biden and election integrity were the most prevalent topics across social media, newspapers, and TV. These two topics also surfaced regularly in voters’ recollections of the candidates, suggesting their impression lasted through the presidential election.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49645922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Research note: Examining how various social media platforms have responded to COVID-19 misinformation 研究说明：研究各种社交媒体平台如何应对新冠肺炎错误信息
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-85
N. Krishnan, Jiayan Gu, Rebekah Tromble, L. Abroms
{"title":"Research note: Examining how various social media platforms have responded to COVID-19 misinformation","authors":"N. Krishnan, Jiayan Gu, Rebekah Tromble, L. Abroms","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-85","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-85","url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed community guidelines and official news releases and blog posts from 12 leading social media and messaging platforms (SMPs) to examine their responses to COVID-19 misinformation. While the majority of platforms stated that they prohibited COVID-19 misinformation, the responses of many platforms lacked clarity and transparency. Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter had largely consistent responses, but other platforms varied with regard to types of content prohibited, criteria guiding responses, and remedies developed to address misinformation. Only Twitter and YouTube described their systems for applying various remedies. These differences highlight the need to establish general standards across platforms to address COVID-19 misinformation more cohesively.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43917303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Digital literacy is associated with more discerning accuracy judgments but not sharing intentions 数字素养与更敏锐的准确判断有关，但与分享意图无关
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-83
Nathaniel Sirlin, Ziv Epstein, A. Arechar, David G. Rand
{"title":"Digital literacy is associated with more discerning accuracy judgments but not sharing intentions","authors":"Nathaniel Sirlin, Ziv Epstein, A. Arechar, David G. Rand","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-83","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-83","url":null,"abstract":"It has been widely argued that social media users with low digital literacy—who lack fluency with basic technological concepts related to the internet—are more likely to fall for online misinformation, but surprisingly little research has examined this association empirically. In a large survey experiment involving true and false news posts about politics and COVID-19, we found that digital literacy is indeed an important predictor of the ability to tell truth from falsehood when judging headline accuracy. However, digital literacy is not a robust predictor of users’ intentions to share true versus false headlines. This observation resonates with recent observations of a substantial disconnect between accuracy judgments and sharing intentions. Furthermore, our results suggest that lack of digital literacy may be useful for helping to identify people with inaccurate beliefs, but not for identifying those who are more likely to spread misinformation online.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42275600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Misinformation interventions are common, divisive, and poorly understood 错误的信息干预是常见的，分裂的，和理解不足
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-10-27 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-81
Emily Saltz, Soubhik Barari, Claire Leibowicz, C. Wardle
{"title":"Misinformation interventions are common, divisive, and poorly understood","authors":"Emily Saltz, Soubhik Barari, Claire Leibowicz, C. Wardle","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-81","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-81","url":null,"abstract":"Social media platforms label, remove, or otherwise intervene on thousands of posts containing misleading or inaccurate information every day. Who encounters these interventions, and how do they react? A demographically representative survey of 1,207 Americans reveals that 49% have been exposed to some form of online misinformation intervention. However, most are not well-informed about what kinds of systems, both algorithmic and human, are applying these interventions: 40% believe that content is mostly or all checked, and 17.5% are not sure, with errors attributed to biased judgment more than any other cause, across political parties. Although support for interventions differs considerably by political party, other distinct traits predict support, including trust in institutions, frequent social media usage, and exposure to “appropriate” interventions.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48877380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Vaccine hesitancy in online spaces: A scoping review of the research literature, 2000-2020 在线空间中的疫苗犹豫:2000-2020年研究文献的范围审查
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-82
Timothy Neff, Jonas Kaiser, Irene V. Pasquetto, D. Jemielniak, D. Dimitrakopoulou, Siobhán Grayson, Nat Gyenes, Paola Ricaurte, Javier Ruiz-Soler, Amy Zhang
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy in online spaces: A scoping review of the research literature, 2000-2020","authors":"Timothy Neff, Jonas Kaiser, Irene V. Pasquetto, D. Jemielniak, D. Dimitrakopoulou, Siobhán Grayson, Nat Gyenes, Paola Ricaurte, Javier Ruiz-Soler, Amy Zhang","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-82","url":null,"abstract":"We review 100 articles published from 2000 to early 2020 that research aspects of vaccine hesitancy in online communication spaces and identify several gaps in the literature prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. These gaps relate to five areas: disciplinary focus; specific vaccine, condition, or disease focus; stakeholders and implications; research methodology; and geographical coverage. Our findings show that we entered the global pandemic vaccination effort without a thorough understanding of how levels of confidence and hesitancy might differ across conditions and vaccines, geographical areas, and platforms, or how they might change over time. In addition, little was known about the role of platforms, platforms’ politics, and specific sociotechnical affordances in the spread of vaccine hesitancy and the associated issue of misinformation online.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44334400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Research note: Understanding offline Covid-19 conspiracy theories: A content analysis of The Light “truthpaper” 研究说明：理解线下新冠肺炎阴谋论：The Light“truthpaper”的内容分析
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-80
R. Dacombe, Nicole Souter, Lumi Westerlund
{"title":"Research note: Understanding offline Covid-19 conspiracy theories: A content analysis of The Light “truthpaper”","authors":"R. Dacombe, Nicole Souter, Lumi Westerlund","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-80","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the ways in which offline conspiracist material concerned with Covid-19 is presented and structured through a content analysis of The Light, a newspaper produced and distributed by activists in the U.K. Our analysis shows that conspiracy theories related to Covid-19 are included alongside a range of other, non-conspiracist content and that readers encounter these ideas in a format which closely resembles a conventional newspaper. We also find evidence that The Light includes content that is aimed at prompting participation and activism amongst adherents of conspiracy theories, rather than simply presenting information. These findings have implications for policymakers aiming to mitigate the effects of Covid-19 misinformation and provide a corrective to the focus of recent research on online dissemination of conspiracist material.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45671857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of social science research on the impact of countermeasures against influence operations 社会科学研究对影响操作对策的影响评述
Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-79
Laura Courchesne, Julia Ilhardt, Jacob N. Shapiro
{"title":"Review of social science research on the impact of countermeasures against influence operations","authors":"Laura Courchesne, Julia Ilhardt, Jacob N. Shapiro","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-79","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-79","url":null,"abstract":"Despite ongoing discussion of the need for increased regulation and oversight of social media, as well as debate over the extent to which the platforms themselves should be responsible for containing misinformation, there is little consensus on which interventions work to address the problem of influence operations and disinformation campaigns. To provide policymakers and scholars a baseline on academic evidence about the efficacy of countermeasures, the Empirical Studies of Conflict Project conducted a systematic review of research articles that aimed to estimate the impact of interventions that could reduce the impact of misinformation.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42438552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信