Vaccine hesitancy in online spaces: A scoping review of the research literature, 2000-2020

Timothy Neff, Jonas Kaiser, Irene V. Pasquetto, D. Jemielniak, D. Dimitrakopoulou, Siobhán Grayson, Nat Gyenes, Paola Ricaurte, Javier Ruiz-Soler, Amy Zhang
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy in online spaces: A scoping review of the research literature, 2000-2020","authors":"Timothy Neff, Jonas Kaiser, Irene V. Pasquetto, D. Jemielniak, D. Dimitrakopoulou, Siobhán Grayson, Nat Gyenes, Paola Ricaurte, Javier Ruiz-Soler, Amy Zhang","doi":"10.37016/mr-2020-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review 100 articles published from 2000 to early 2020 that research aspects of vaccine hesitancy in online communication spaces and identify several gaps in the literature prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. These gaps relate to five areas: disciplinary focus; specific vaccine, condition, or disease focus; stakeholders and implications; research methodology; and geographical coverage. Our findings show that we entered the global pandemic vaccination effort without a thorough understanding of how levels of confidence and hesitancy might differ across conditions and vaccines, geographical areas, and platforms, or how they might change over time. In addition, little was known about the role of platforms, platforms’ politics, and specific sociotechnical affordances in the spread of vaccine hesitancy and the associated issue of misinformation online.","PeriodicalId":93289,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Kennedy School misinformation review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

We review 100 articles published from 2000 to early 2020 that research aspects of vaccine hesitancy in online communication spaces and identify several gaps in the literature prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. These gaps relate to five areas: disciplinary focus; specific vaccine, condition, or disease focus; stakeholders and implications; research methodology; and geographical coverage. Our findings show that we entered the global pandemic vaccination effort without a thorough understanding of how levels of confidence and hesitancy might differ across conditions and vaccines, geographical areas, and platforms, or how they might change over time. In addition, little was known about the role of platforms, platforms’ politics, and specific sociotechnical affordances in the spread of vaccine hesitancy and the associated issue of misinformation online.
在线空间中的疫苗犹豫:2000-2020年研究文献的范围审查
我们回顾了2000年至2020年初发表的100篇文章,这些文章研究了在线交流空间中疫苗犹豫的各个方面,并确定了新冠肺炎大流行前文献中的几个空白。这些差距涉及五个领域:学科重点;特定的疫苗、状况或疾病焦点;利益相关者及其影响;研究方法论;以及地理覆盖范围。我们的研究结果表明,我们在参与全球大流行疫苗接种工作时,没有彻底了解不同条件和疫苗、地理区域和平台的信心和犹豫程度可能会有什么不同,或者它们可能会随着时间的推移而发生什么变化。此外,人们对平台的作用、平台的政治和特定的社会技术可供性在疫苗犹豫的传播中以及相关的网上错误信息问题知之甚少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信