{"title":"Predictors and Management Strategies of Pseudomeningoceles in Neurosurgical\u0000Procedures: Breaking the Ice","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/an.03.01.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33140/an.03.01.05","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pseudomeningoceles are extradural collections of CSF that result following a breach in the dural–\u0000arachnoid layer. Pseudomeningoceles are recognized complications after cranial and spinal surgery with some centers\u0000reporting an incidence exceeding 40%.\u0000Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the predictors of post-operative pseudomeningoceles in neurosurgical practice.\u0000To formulate a standardised management protocol for treatment of pseudomeningocele.\u0000Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study where all cases of cranial and spinal pseudomeningoceles\u0000were taken into consideration from October 2016 to October 2018 (2 years ).There were 45 consecutive cases of\u0000pseudomeningocele were included in the study.\u0000Results: Among the total cranial and spinal cases operated in one year period at our institute incidence of\u0000pseudomeningocele was noted to be 1.1% (45/3892). 38 (84.4%) were cranial cases, among them 21 (46.7%) were\u0000supratentorial and 17 (37.8%) were infratentorial, 5 (15.6%) cases had primary water tight dural closure, 33 ( 73.3%)\u0000duraplasty done using pericranial fascia, Dura was not kept opened in any cases and artificial sealants were not\u0000used in any case.7 (15.6%) were spinal cases and 4 cases dura was not opened and didn’t recognize any leak,3 cases\u0000dura was opened and primary dural closure done in 2 cases and 1 case closure was done using a muscle graft, no\u0000artificial sealants were used. Pseudomeningocele was managed with multiple treatment modalities and best treatment\u0000options noted were bed rest with tight bandage application (44.4%), Continuous lumbar drain for 5 days (17.8%),\u0000Intermittent lumbar drainage for 5 days (13.3%), these three constituted 75.5% of successful treatment modality\u0000used. Post pseudomeningocele development hydrocephalus was noted in 7 (15.6%) among them 3 (6.7%) cases\u0000required ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. Only 2(4.4%) patients developed complications like csf leak and meningitis\u0000and 3 (6.7%) cases had mortality.\u0000Conclusion: We conclude that in our study pseudomeningocele was found to be more common in the supratentorial\u0000compartment in contrast to other studies in literature, majority of the cases subsided with conservative management,\u0000type of closure of the dura did not impact the outcome, meningitis was not a significant etiology and standardized\u0000management protocol has been proposed for effective management of pseudomeningocele.","PeriodicalId":93246,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45116786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}