American journal of robotic surgery最新文献_第2页

The History of Robotics in Surgical Specialties. 机器人技术在外科专业的历史。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1166/AJRS.2014.1006

J. Shah, A. Vyas, D. Vyas

{"title":"The History of Robotics in Surgical Specialties.","authors":"J. Shah, A. Vyas, D. Vyas","doi":"10.1166/AJRS.2014.1006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1166/AJRS.2014.1006","url":null,"abstract":"A major positive step in the field of surgery was made when a robot was first used in the theater of surgery about 25 years ago. The robot was a PUMA 200 (Westinghouse Electric, Pittsburgh, PA) which was used for needle placement in a CT-guided brain biopsy1. Since then it has been exciting to see that the field of robotic surgery grow in leaps and bounds. Part of the reason for this is the plethora of benefits afforded by robotics that are simply absent in traditional surgical methods. For example, robots offer stability, accuracy, integration with modern imaging technology, greater range of motion, telesurgery, in addition to multiple other benefits inherent to individual surgical specialties2. Since the introduction of robotic surgery, many advances have been made in the field. In order to fully utilize the potential of the surgical robot it is important to understand the past in order to build towards the future. In order to understand the past, it is important to look at both the advances and achievements of robotic surgery in the various fields of surgery such as otolaryngological, neurosurgery, gynecological, cardiothoracic, gastric, urologic, orthopedic, endoscopy, and miniature after which the future developments that are on the horizon can be evaluated. This article will enumerate major milestones and will continue with limitations in subsequent articles.","PeriodicalId":91050,"journal":{"name":"American journal of robotic surgery","volume":"119 1","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1166/AJRS.2014.1006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65009941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 82

Robotic Surgery: Applications. 机器人手术:应用。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1166/AJRS.2014.1004

Tiffany Leung, D. Vyas

引用次数: 16

Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact. 单点机器人胆囊切除术的现状、可行性、经济性和整体影响。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1166/AJRS.2014.1007

D. Vyas, Cara Weiner, A. Vyas

{"title":"Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact.","authors":"D. Vyas, Cara Weiner, A. Vyas","doi":"10.1166/AJRS.2014.1007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1166/AJRS.2014.1007","url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews recent, though limited, articles on the topic of robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC), a relatively new approach that is rapidly advancing in both research and clinical application. Laparoscopy has typically been the standard method of performing a cholecystectomy, but recent medical advances have led to usage of the da Vinci® Surgical System robot technology to assist in performing the procedure. Several studies have compared outcomes of the RSSC to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies and to the traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Single port advocates think it as a tool with better cosmetic results and questionable less post-operative pain; however, single port also limits the maneuverability of the instrument arms, making some tasks more difficult, bigger single incision, more chances of post operative hernia. Overall, the RSSC is considered as safe with no worse outcomes regarding pain, hospital stay length, operative time, and patient satisfaction when compared to other cholecystectomy methods. Future direction includes expanding use of the miniature instruments and further advanced tools to overcome manipulation and visualization limitations. Thus far, though, there may be enough evidence with these smaller studies to support lack of harm with more use of resources.","PeriodicalId":91050,"journal":{"name":"American journal of robotic surgery","volume":"162 1","pages":"1-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65010636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Robotics in Colonoscopy. 结肠镜检查中的机器人技术。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1166/ajrs.2014.1008

Dan Cater, Arpita Vyas, Dinesh Vyas

引用次数: 4

Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact. 单点机器人胆囊切除术的现状、可行性、经济性和整体影响。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01

Dinesh Vyas, Cara Weiner, Arpita K Vyas

{"title":"Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact.","authors":"Dinesh Vyas, Cara Weiner, Arpita K Vyas","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews recent, though limited, articles on the topic of robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC), a relatively new approach that is rapidly advancing in both research and clinical application. Laparoscopy has typically been the standard method of performing a cholecystectomy, but recent medical advances have led to usage of the da Vinci® Surgical System robot technology to assist in performing the procedure. Several studies have compared outcomes of the RSSC to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies and to the traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Single port advocates think it as a tool with better cosmetic results and questionable less post-operative pain; however, single port also limits the maneuverability of the instrument arms, making some tasks more difficult, bigger single incision, more chances of post operative hernia. Overall, the RSSC is considered as safe with no worse outcomes regarding pain, hospital stay length, operative time, and patient satisfaction when compared to other cholecystectomy methods. Future direction includes expanding use of the miniature instruments and further advanced tools to overcome manipulation and visualization limitations. Thus far, though, there may be enough evidence with these smaller studies to support lack of harm with more use of resources.","PeriodicalId":91050,"journal":{"name":"American journal of robotic surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584411/pdf/nihms-723429.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34120393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Nanorobotic Applications in Medicine: Current Proposals and Designs. 纳米机器人在医学中的应用：当前的提案和设计。

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI: 10.1166/ajrs.2014.1010

Yamaan Saadeh, Dinesh Vyas

引用次数: 0