Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact.

American journal of robotic surgery Pub Date : 2014-06-01
Dinesh Vyas, Cara Weiner, Arpita K Vyas
{"title":"Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact.","authors":"Dinesh Vyas,&nbsp;Cara Weiner,&nbsp;Arpita K Vyas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reviews recent, though limited, articles on the topic of robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC), a relatively new approach that is rapidly advancing in both research and clinical application. Laparoscopy has typically been the standard method of performing a cholecystectomy, but recent medical advances have led to usage of the da Vinci<sup>®</sup> Surgical System robot technology to assist in performing the procedure. Several studies have compared outcomes of the RSSC to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies and to the traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Single port advocates think it as a tool with better cosmetic results and questionable less post-operative pain; however, single port also limits the maneuverability of the instrument arms, making some tasks more difficult, bigger single incision, more chances of post operative hernia. Overall, the RSSC is considered as safe with no worse outcomes regarding pain, hospital stay length, operative time, and patient satisfaction when compared to other cholecystectomy methods. Future direction includes expanding use of the miniature instruments and further advanced tools to overcome manipulation and visualization limitations. Thus far, though, there may be enough evidence with these smaller studies to support lack of harm with more use of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":91050,"journal":{"name":"American journal of robotic surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584411/pdf/nihms-723429.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of robotic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews recent, though limited, articles on the topic of robotic single-site cholecystectomy (RSSC), a relatively new approach that is rapidly advancing in both research and clinical application. Laparoscopy has typically been the standard method of performing a cholecystectomy, but recent medical advances have led to usage of the da Vinci® Surgical System robot technology to assist in performing the procedure. Several studies have compared outcomes of the RSSC to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies and to the traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Single port advocates think it as a tool with better cosmetic results and questionable less post-operative pain; however, single port also limits the maneuverability of the instrument arms, making some tasks more difficult, bigger single incision, more chances of post operative hernia. Overall, the RSSC is considered as safe with no worse outcomes regarding pain, hospital stay length, operative time, and patient satisfaction when compared to other cholecystectomy methods. Future direction includes expanding use of the miniature instruments and further advanced tools to overcome manipulation and visualization limitations. Thus far, though, there may be enough evidence with these smaller studies to support lack of harm with more use of resources.

单点机器人胆囊切除术的现状、可行性、经济性和整体影响。
本文综述了机器人单部位胆囊切除术(RSSC)这一在研究和临床应用中都迅速发展的相对较新的方法。腹腔镜检查通常是执行胆囊切除术的标准方法,但最近的医学进步已经导致使用达芬奇®手术系统机器人技术来协助执行程序。一些研究比较了RSSC与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术和传统的多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。单一端口的支持者认为它是一种更好的美容效果和更少的术后疼痛的工具;然而,单端口也限制了器械臂的可操作性,使一些任务更加困难,单切口更大,术后疝气的可能性更大。总的来说,与其他胆囊切除术方法相比,RSSC被认为是安全的,在疼痛、住院时间、手术时间和患者满意度方面没有更差的结果。未来的方向包括扩大微型仪器和更先进的工具的使用,以克服操作和可视化的限制。然而,到目前为止,这些较小的研究可能有足够的证据支持更多地使用资源不会造成伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信