BMJ Quality & Safety最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Large-scale observational study of AI-based patient and surgical material verification system in ophthalmology: real-world evaluation in 37 529 cases. 基于人工智能的眼科患者和手术材料验证系统的大规模观察研究:37 529例的真实世界评估。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018018
Hitoshi Tabuchi, Naofumi Ishitobi, Hodaka Deguchi, Yuta Nakaniida, Hayato Tanaka, Masahiro Akada, Mao Tanabe
{"title":"Large-scale observational study of AI-based patient and surgical material verification system in ophthalmology: real-world evaluation in 37 529 cases.","authors":"Hitoshi Tabuchi, Naofumi Ishitobi, Hodaka Deguchi, Yuta Nakaniida, Hayato Tanaka, Masahiro Akada, Mao Tanabe","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018018","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical errors in ophthalmology can have devastating consequences. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based surgical safety system to prevent errors in patient identification, surgical laterality and intraocular lens (IOL) selection. This study aimed to evaluate its effectiveness in real-world ophthalmic surgical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational before-and-after implementation study, we analysed 37 529 ophthalmic surgeries (18 767 pre-implementation, 18 762 post implementation) performed at Tsukazaki Hospital, Japan, between 1 March 2019 and 31 March 2024. The AI system, integrated with the WHO surgical safety checklist, was implemented for patient identification, surgical laterality verification and IOL authentication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post implementation, five medical errors (0.027%) occurred, with four in non-authenticated cases (where the AI system was not fully implemented or properly used), compared with one (0.0053%) pre-implementation (p=0.125). Of the four non-authenticated errors, two were laterality errors during the initial implementation period and two were IOL implantation errors involving unlearned IOLs (7.3% of cases) due to delayed AI updates. The AI system identified 30 near misses (0.16%) post implementation, vs 9 (0.048%) pre-implementation (p=0.00067), surgical laterality errors/near misses occurred at 0.039% (7/18 762) and IOL recognition at 0.29% (28/9713). The system achieved>99% implementation after 3 months. Authentication performance metrics showed high efficiency: facial recognition (1.13 attempts, 11.8 s), surgical laterality (1.05 attempts, 3.10 s) and IOL recognition (1.15 attempts, 8.57 s). Cost-benefit analysis revealed potential benefits ranging from US$181 946.94 to US$2 769 129.12 in conservative and intermediate scenarios, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AI-based surgical safety system significantly increased near miss detection and showed potential economic benefits. However, errors in non-authenticated cases underscore the importance of consistent system use and integration with existing safety protocols. These findings emphasise that while AI can enhance surgical safety, its effectiveness depends on proper implementation and continuous refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"433-442"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142754517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Support for hospital doctors' workplace well-being in England: the Care Under Pressure 3 realist evaluation. 对英国医院医生工作场所幸福感的支持:压力下的护理现实主义评估。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017698
Anna Melvin, Alison Pearson, Daniele Carrieri, Charlotte Bramwell, Jason Hancock, Jessica Scott, Helen Foster Collins, Stuart McPhail, Mark Pearson, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Geoff Wong, Karen Mattick
{"title":"Support for hospital doctors' workplace well-being in England: the Care Under Pressure 3 realist evaluation.","authors":"Anna Melvin, Alison Pearson, Daniele Carrieri, Charlotte Bramwell, Jason Hancock, Jessica Scott, Helen Foster Collins, Stuart McPhail, Mark Pearson, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Geoff Wong, Karen Mattick","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017698","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017698","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The vital role of medical workforce well-being for improving patient experience and population health while assuring safety and reducing costs is recognised internationally. Yet the persistence of poor well-being outcomes suggests that current support initiatives are suboptimal. The aim of this research study was to work with, and learn from, diverse hospital settings to understand how to optimise strategies to improve doctors' well-being and reduce negative impacts on the workforce and patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Realist evaluation consistent with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) II quality standards. Realist interviews (n=124) with doctors, well-being intervention implementers/practitioners and leaders in eight hospital settings (England) were analysed using realist logic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were four key findings, underpinned by 21 context-mechanism-outcome configurations: (1) solutions needed to align with problems, to support doctor well-being and avoid harm to doctors; (2) doctors needed to be involved in creating solutions to their well-being problems; (3) doctors often did not know what support was available to help them with well-being problems and (4) there were physical and psychological barriers to accessing well-being support.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Doctors are mandated to 'first, do no harm' to their patients, and the same consideration should be extended to doctors themselves. Since doctors can be harmed by poorly designed or implemented well-being interventions, new approaches need careful planning and evaluation. Our research identified many ineffective or harmful interventions that could be stopped. The findings are likely transferable to other settings and countries, given the realist approach leading to principles and causal explanations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"443-456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143958323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding the evidence for artificial intelligence in healthcare. 了解医疗保健领域人工智能的证据。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018559
Gretchen Purcell Jackson, Edward H Shortliffe
{"title":"Understanding the evidence for artificial intelligence in healthcare.","authors":"Gretchen Purcell Jackson, Edward H Shortliffe","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018559","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018559","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"421-424"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143960022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Doing 'detective work' to find a cancer: how are non-specific symptom pathways for cancer investigation organised, and what are the implications for safety and quality of care? A multisite qualitative approach. 做“侦探工作”以发现癌症:如何组织癌症调查的非特异性症状途径,以及对安全和护理质量的影响?多站点定性方法。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017749
Georgia B Black, Brian D Nicholson, Julie-Ann Moreland, Naomi J Fulop, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ruth Baxter
{"title":"Doing 'detective work' to find a cancer: how are non-specific symptom pathways for cancer investigation organised, and what are the implications for safety and quality of care? A multisite qualitative approach.","authors":"Georgia B Black, Brian D Nicholson, Julie-Ann Moreland, Naomi J Fulop, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Ruth Baxter","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017749","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past two decades, the UK has actively developed policies to enhance early cancer diagnosis, particularly for individuals with non-specific cancer symptoms. Non-specific symptom (NSS) pathways were piloted and then implemented in 2015 to address delays in referral and diagnosis. The aim of this study was to outline the functions that enable NSS teams to investigate cancer and other diagnoses for patients with NSSs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis was derived from a multisite ethnographic study conducted between 2020 and 2023 across four major National Health Service (NHS) trusts. Data collection encompassed observations, patient shadowing, interviews with clinicians and patients (n=54) and gathered documents. We used principles of the functional resonance analysis method to identify the functions of the NSS pathway and analyse their relevance to patient safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis produced 29 distinct functions within NSS pathways, organised into two clusters: pretesting assessment and information gathering, and post-testing interpretation and management. Safety-critical functions encompassed assessing the reason for referral, deciding on a plan of investigation and estimating the remaining cancer risk. We also identified ways that teams build and maintain safety across all functions, for example, by cultivating generalist-specialist expertise within the team and creating continuity through patient navigation. Variation in practice across sites revealed targets for an NSS pathway blueprint that would foster local development and quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that national and local improvement plans could differentiate specific policies to reduce unwarranted variation and support adaptive variation that facilitates the delivery of safe care within the local context. Enhancing multidisciplinary teams with additional consultants and deploying patient navigators with clinical backgrounds could improve safety within NSS pathways. Future research should investigate different models of generalist-specialist team composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"457-468"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143063701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying the cost savings and health impacts of improving colonoscopy quality: an economic evaluation. 量化提高结肠镜检查质量所节约的成本和对健康的影响:一项经济评估。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016932
Stephen McCarthy, Matthew David Rutter, Peter McMeekin, Jamie Catlow, Linda Sharp, Matthew Brookes, Roland Valori, Rashmi Bhardwaj-Gosling, Tom Lee, Richard McNally, Andrew McCarthy, Joanne Gray
{"title":"Quantifying the cost savings and health impacts of improving colonoscopy quality: an economic evaluation.","authors":"Stephen McCarthy, Matthew David Rutter, Peter McMeekin, Jamie Catlow, Linda Sharp, Matthew Brookes, Roland Valori, Rashmi Bhardwaj-Gosling, Tom Lee, Richard McNally, Andrew McCarthy, Joanne Gray","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016932","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016932","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate and quantify the cost implications and health impacts of improving the performance of English endoscopy services to the optimum quality as defined by postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) rates.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A semi-Markov state-transition model was constructed, following the logical treatment pathway of individuals who could potentially undergo a diagnostic colonoscopy. The model consisted of three identical arms, each representing a high, middle or low-performing trust's endoscopy service, defined by PCCRC rates. A cohort of 40-year-old individuals was simulated in each arm of the model. The model's time horizon was when the cohort reached 90 years of age and the total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated for all trusts. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 40-year-old individual gains 0.0006 QALYs and savings of £6.75 over the model lifetime by attending a high-performing trust compared with attending a middle-performing trust and gains 0.0012 QALYs and savings of £14.64 compared with attending a low-performing trust. For the population of England aged between 40 and 86, if all low and middle-performing trusts were improved to the level of a high-performing trust, QALY gains of 14 044 and cost savings of £249 311 295 are possible. Higher quality trusts dominated lower quality trusts; any improvement in the PCCRC rate was cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving the quality of endoscopy services would lead to QALY gains among the population, in addition to cost savings to the healthcare provider. If all middle and low-performing trusts were improved to the level of a high-performing trust, our results estimate that the English National Health Service would save approximately £5 million per year.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141455228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving weaning and liberation from mechanical ventilation for tracheostomy patients: a quality improvement initiative. 改善气管切开术患者的脱机和脱离机械通气:一项质量改进倡议。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018324
Michael Mikhaeil, Michelle Bernard, Jenna Currie, Caroline Bolduc, Jordana Radke, Savannah Kranjc, Joanne Meyer
{"title":"Improving weaning and liberation from mechanical ventilation for tracheostomy patients: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Michael Mikhaeil, Michelle Bernard, Jenna Currie, Caroline Bolduc, Jordana Radke, Savannah Kranjc, Joanne Meyer","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018324","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018324","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), prolonged mechanical ventilation is associated with poor outcomes. A quality improvement (QI) initiative with the aim of reducing median time on the ventilator for tracheostomy patients was undertaken at a tertiary care ICU in Toronto, Canada. A QI team was formed, and using QI methodology, a deep understanding of our local process was achieved. Based on this information and on the latest evidence on weaning, a standard tracheostomy weaning protocol was designed. The protocol was refined through three developmental and two testing plan-do-study-act cycles. This study was a prospective time series showing the effect of the implementation of our intervention on tracheotomy patients' time on the ventilator. The baseline median number of days on the ventilator after tracheostomy insertion was 17. Within 12 months of the introduction of the intervention, a shift in the data showing a reduction in the median time on the ventilator to 10.6 days had developed. Length of stay in the ICU was reduced by 4.3 days. Adherence and compliance to the protocol also improved over time. A standard tracheostomy weaning protocol was successfully developed, tested and implemented in a tertiary care ICU. Using strategies such as frequent communication with key stakeholders and incorporating a tracheostomy weaning progress sheet to document and track tracheostomy patients and their outcomes, this QI intervention has become engrained in the local culture at our centre. This weaning protocol has successfully reduced the median time on the ventilator for tracheostomy patients by over 6 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"480-488"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143976977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
We will take some team resilience, please: Evidence-based recommendations for supporting diagnostic teamwork. 我们将采取一些团队弹性,请:基于证据的建议,以支持诊断性团队合作。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018685
Gabriela Fernández Castillo, Eduardo Salas, Eric J Thomas
{"title":"We will take some team resilience, please: Evidence-based recommendations for supporting diagnostic teamwork.","authors":"Gabriela Fernández Castillo, Eduardo Salas, Eric J Thomas","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018685","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018685","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"429-432"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143779025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Workforce well-being is workforce readiness: it is time to advance from describing the problem to solving it. 劳动力幸福感是劳动力准备就绪:是时候从描述问题推进到解决问题了。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018198
Bryan Sexton, Jochen Profit
{"title":"Workforce well-being is workforce readiness: it is time to advance from describing the problem to solving it.","authors":"Bryan Sexton, Jochen Profit","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018198","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018198","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"425-428"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144109627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Checklist conundrum: are we checking the right boxes? 检查清单难题:我们是否检查了正确的选项?
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-18 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018798
Gabriel Torrealba-Acosta, César E Escamilla-Ocañas
{"title":"Checklist conundrum: are we checking the right boxes?","authors":"Gabriel Torrealba-Acosta, César E Escamilla-Ocañas","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018798","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144324462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Better without catheter: the nationwide spread of a deimplementation strategy in clinical practice. 无导尿管更好:在临床实践中推广的一种去实施策略。
IF 5.6 1区 医学
BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018681
Eva Willemiek Verkerk, Maike Wm Raasing, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Bart J Laan
{"title":"<i>Better without catheter</i>: the nationwide spread of a deimplementation strategy in clinical practice.","authors":"Eva Willemiek Verkerk, Maike Wm Raasing, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Bart J Laan","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018681","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many successful implementation studies fail to be sustained and spread after the publication. We aimed to spread a successful deimplementation strategy that reduced inappropriate peripheral venous catheter and urinary catheter use and evaluated the spread, adoption and effects of this strategy in clinical practice.We adapted the original successful study into a more accessible project, creating a toolkit called <i>Better without catheter</i> We recruited 39 hospitals (more than half of all Dutch hospitals) across the Netherlands, which participated in regular online meetings. After 21 months, we sent an online survey to the project leaders of the participating hospitals to assess progress, barriers and facilitators to adopting the project.Widespread promotion and targeted emails were key factors in spreading <i>Better without catheter</i> There was considerable variation in the hospitals' progress; five had not yet started, six had completed the project and the others were at various stages in between. Major barriers included lack of time and resources, organisational facilities and the composition of local project teams. Key facilitators were organisational support and the involvement of physicians and nurse leaders. Project leaders valued the toolkit, the flexibility to tailor the project and the online meetings.Overall, the spread and adoption of this deimplementation strategy showed encouraging results, with 39 hospitals joining the network within 2 years. Although reach and engagement were high, the hospitals' progress in the project was frequently hindered by organisational and management factors. Four elements supported the uptake: widespread promotion, the translation of the original study into an accessible improvement project with practical tools, the flexibility to tailor the approach locally and participation in a peer network.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144265240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信