International survey of people living with chronic conditions: development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in 18 countries.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jose M Valderas, Ian Porter, Jonathan P Evans, Monique Heijmans, Mieke Rijken, Oliver Groene, Janika Bloemeke-Cammin, Rosa Sunol, Rachel Williams, Marta Ballester, Katherine de Bienassis, Candan Kendir, Frederico Guanais, Dolf de Boer, Michael van den Berg
{"title":"International survey of people living with chronic conditions: development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in 18 countries.","authors":"Jose M Valderas, Ian Porter, Jonathan P Evans, Monique Heijmans, Mieke Rijken, Oliver Groene, Janika Bloemeke-Cammin, Rosa Sunol, Rachel Williams, Marta Ballester, Katherine de Bienassis, Candan Kendir, Frederico Guanais, Dolf de Boer, Michael van den Berg","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) initiative of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development aimed to develop a valid and reliable instrument for self-reported assessment of health outcomes and experiences in primary and ambulatory care for people living with chronic conditions. This paper reports on the development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in an 18-country field trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following systematic reviews of instruments measuring core domains in the PaRIS conceptual framework (outcomes, experiences, health and healthcare capabilities and health behaviours), four instruments for each domain were shortlisted, and their psychometric performance was assessed using the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes tool. In a modified Delphi procedure, one instrument was selected for each domain, along with additional relevant items. The preliminary English questionnaire was translated and cognitively tested. Psychometric evaluation was conducted on field trial data at item (missingness, distribution, ceiling/floor effects) and scale level (reliability, structure, construct validity).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>217 instruments were identified measuring one or more of the domains of the conceptual framework. Following mapping and prioritisation, the first draft of the PaRIS-PQ included 118 items. In the field trial (18 countries, 10 894 patients) median completion time ranged 24-33 minutes. PaRIS-PQ performed well at item and scale level. Reliability was ≥0.70 for most relevant measures at patient level, but not at practice and country level. Validity was adequate overall. Removal of additional items (3) resulted in the final PaRIS-PQ (115 items).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>PaRIS-PQ demonstrates adequate psychometric performance for measuring experiences and outcomes of primary care for people living with chronic conditions. The instrument facilitates the collection of essential information for health policy and systems decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Patient Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) initiative of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development aimed to develop a valid and reliable instrument for self-reported assessment of health outcomes and experiences in primary and ambulatory care for people living with chronic conditions. This paper reports on the development and evaluation of the PaRIS Patient Questionnaire (PaRIS-PQ) in an 18-country field trial.

Methods: Following systematic reviews of instruments measuring core domains in the PaRIS conceptual framework (outcomes, experiences, health and healthcare capabilities and health behaviours), four instruments for each domain were shortlisted, and their psychometric performance was assessed using the Evaluating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes tool. In a modified Delphi procedure, one instrument was selected for each domain, along with additional relevant items. The preliminary English questionnaire was translated and cognitively tested. Psychometric evaluation was conducted on field trial data at item (missingness, distribution, ceiling/floor effects) and scale level (reliability, structure, construct validity).

Findings: 217 instruments were identified measuring one or more of the domains of the conceptual framework. Following mapping and prioritisation, the first draft of the PaRIS-PQ included 118 items. In the field trial (18 countries, 10 894 patients) median completion time ranged 24-33 minutes. PaRIS-PQ performed well at item and scale level. Reliability was ≥0.70 for most relevant measures at patient level, but not at practice and country level. Validity was adequate overall. Removal of additional items (3) resulted in the final PaRIS-PQ (115 items).

Interpretation: PaRIS-PQ demonstrates adequate psychometric performance for measuring experiences and outcomes of primary care for people living with chronic conditions. The instrument facilitates the collection of essential information for health policy and systems decision-making.

慢性疾病患者国际调查:巴黎患者问卷(PaRIS- pq)在18个国家的开发和评估
背景:经济合作与发展组织的患者报告指标调查(PaRIS)倡议旨在开发一种有效和可靠的工具,用于自我报告慢性病患者在初级和门诊护理方面的健康结果和经验。本文报道了在18个国家的现场试验中PaRIS患者问卷(PaRIS- pq)的开发和评估。方法:在对PaRIS概念框架中测量核心领域(结果、经验、健康和医疗保健能力和健康行为)的工具进行系统回顾后,为每个领域列出了四种工具,并使用评估患者报告结果的测量工具对其心理测量性能进行评估。在改进的德尔菲程序中,为每个领域选择一个仪器,以及附加的相关项目。对初步的英文问卷进行翻译和认知测试。对现场试验数据在项目(缺失、分布、天花板/地板效应)和量表水平(信度、结构、构念效度)上进行心理测量评价。发现:217种工具被确定测量概念框架的一个或多个领域。在绘制和确定优先级之后,PaRIS-PQ的初稿包括118个项目。在现场试验(18个国家,10894名患者)中位完成时间为24-33分钟。PaRIS-PQ在项目和量表水平上表现良好。在患者水平上,大多数相关测量的信度≥0.70,但在实践和国家水平上则不然。效度总体上是足够的。移除额外的项目(3)产生了最终的PaRIS-PQ(115项)。解释:PaRIS-PQ显示了足够的心理测量性能来测量慢性疾病患者的初级保健经历和结果。该工具有助于收集卫生政策和系统决策所需的基本信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信