Understanding factors influencing sustainability and sustainment of evidence-based bronchiolitis management of infants in Australian and New Zealand hospital settings: a qualitative process evaluation.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victoria Ramsden, Franz E Babl, Libby Haskell, Catherine Wilson, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Middleton, Lisa Kuhn, Alexandra Wallace, Elyssia Bourke, Faye Jordan, Julian Wong, Kai Steinmann, Lauren Shumack, Lisa Kane, Natalie Phillips, Paige Marsh, Shefali Jani, Trevor Kuang, Yvonne Janiszewski, Ed Oakley, Anna Lithgow, Peter Wilson, Rachel Schembri, Stuart Dalziel, Emma Tavender
{"title":"Understanding factors influencing sustainability and sustainment of evidence-based bronchiolitis management of infants in Australian and New Zealand hospital settings: a qualitative process evaluation.","authors":"Victoria Ramsden, Franz E Babl, Libby Haskell, Catherine Wilson, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Middleton, Lisa Kuhn, Alexandra Wallace, Elyssia Bourke, Faye Jordan, Julian Wong, Kai Steinmann, Lauren Shumack, Lisa Kane, Natalie Phillips, Paige Marsh, Shefali Jani, Trevor Kuang, Yvonne Janiszewski, Ed Oakley, Anna Lithgow, Peter Wilson, Rachel Schembri, Stuart Dalziel, Emma Tavender","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2017 Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) Bronchiolitis Knowledge Translation (KT) Study, a cluster randomised trial in 26 Australasian hospitals, found targeted interventions provided over one bronchiolitis season effectively de-implemented five low-value practices (salbutamol, glucocorticoids, chest radiography, antibiotics and epinephrine) by 14.1% (adjusted risk difference, 95% CI 6.5% to 21.7%; p<0.001). A 2-year follow-up study found de-implementation was sustained. This process evaluation aimed to identify factors that influenced sustainability of de-implementation of these five low-value practices in PREDICT Bronchiolitis KT Study intervention hospitals and examine fidelity and/or adaptation of the targeted interventions over 4 years post intervention delivery (sustainment).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted, over 2021 and 2022, with a purposive sample of emergency department (ED) and paediatric inpatient clinicians. Data were analysed thematically into facilitators and barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in Healthcare (CFSCH). The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies was used to explore fidelity and adaptation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 clinicians (nurses: n=26; doctors: n=24) from 12 intervention hospitals were interviewed. Eight themes were identified and mapped to three CFSCH domains: (1) organisational setting; (2) initiative design and delivery and (3) people involved. Facilitators were a culture of evidence-based practice, ongoing multimodal education, strong clinical leadership as unofficial champions and the previous effectiveness of the PREDICT Bronchiolitis KT Study interventions. Barriers were lack of paediatric trained ED staff, assumptions by senior clinicians that junior doctors can provide evidence-based bronchiolitis management, bronchiolitis not a current improvement priority and lack of bronchiolitis education sessions. Use of the targeted interventions reduced over time and, when used, was adapted locally.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insights into factors influencing the sustainability of de-implementation of low-value care in acute care settings. Fostering an evidence-based practice culture, supported by senior leadership and ongoing multimodal education, supports sustainability of improvements in this setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No: ACTRN12621001287820.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2017 Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) Bronchiolitis Knowledge Translation (KT) Study, a cluster randomised trial in 26 Australasian hospitals, found targeted interventions provided over one bronchiolitis season effectively de-implemented five low-value practices (salbutamol, glucocorticoids, chest radiography, antibiotics and epinephrine) by 14.1% (adjusted risk difference, 95% CI 6.5% to 21.7%; p<0.001). A 2-year follow-up study found de-implementation was sustained. This process evaluation aimed to identify factors that influenced sustainability of de-implementation of these five low-value practices in PREDICT Bronchiolitis KT Study intervention hospitals and examine fidelity and/or adaptation of the targeted interventions over 4 years post intervention delivery (sustainment).

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted, over 2021 and 2022, with a purposive sample of emergency department (ED) and paediatric inpatient clinicians. Data were analysed thematically into facilitators and barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in Healthcare (CFSCH). The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies was used to explore fidelity and adaptation.

Results: 50 clinicians (nurses: n=26; doctors: n=24) from 12 intervention hospitals were interviewed. Eight themes were identified and mapped to three CFSCH domains: (1) organisational setting; (2) initiative design and delivery and (3) people involved. Facilitators were a culture of evidence-based practice, ongoing multimodal education, strong clinical leadership as unofficial champions and the previous effectiveness of the PREDICT Bronchiolitis KT Study interventions. Barriers were lack of paediatric trained ED staff, assumptions by senior clinicians that junior doctors can provide evidence-based bronchiolitis management, bronchiolitis not a current improvement priority and lack of bronchiolitis education sessions. Use of the targeted interventions reduced over time and, when used, was adapted locally.

Conclusion: This study provides insights into factors influencing the sustainability of de-implementation of low-value care in acute care settings. Fostering an evidence-based practice culture, supported by senior leadership and ongoing multimodal education, supports sustainability of improvements in this setting.

Trial registration number: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No: ACTRN12621001287820.

了解影响澳大利亚和新西兰医院对婴儿毛细支气管炎循证管理的可持续性和维持性的因素:定性过程评价。
背景:2017年急急诊儿科研究国际合作(PREDICT)细支气管炎知识转化(KT)研究是一项在26家澳大利亚医院进行的聚类随机试验,发现在一个细支气管炎季节提供的有针对性的干预措施有效地减少了14.1%的低价值实践(沙丁胺醇、糖皮质激素、胸部x线摄影、抗生素和肾上腺素)(调整后的风险差异,95% CI 6.5%至21.7%;方法:在2021年和2022年期间,以急诊科(ED)和儿科住院临床医生为目的样本,进行半结构化定性访谈。使用医疗保健可持续性结构综合框架(CFSCH),将数据按主题分析为促进因素和障碍。报告基于证据的实施战略的适应和修改框架用于探索保真度和适应性。结果:对12家干预医院的50名临床医生(护士26名,医生24名)进行了访谈。八个主题被确定并映射到三个CFSCH领域:(1)组织设置;(2)主动设计和交付;(3)参与的人员。促进因素包括循证实践文化、持续的多模式教育、作为非官方倡导者的强大临床领导以及PREDICT毛细支气管炎KT研究干预措施的既往有效性。障碍是缺乏受过儿科培训的急诊科工作人员,高级临床医生认为初级医生可以提供基于证据的细支气管炎管理,细支气管炎不是当前的改善重点,以及缺乏细支气管炎教育课程。有针对性的干预措施的使用随着时间的推移而减少,并且在使用时进行了当地调整。结论:本研究提供了对急性护理环境中低价值护理去实施可持续性的影响因素的见解。在高层领导和持续的多模式教育的支持下,培养以证据为基础的实践文化,支持这种情况下的可持续改进。试验注册号:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册号:ACTRN12621001287820。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信