减少过度使用甲状腺功能检查的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Annabel Jane Chapman, Aneesa Khan, Jordyn Thompson, Vernon Curran, Jessica Otte, Sana Ghaznavi, Greg Carney, Kate Campbell, Vivian Lam, Caldon Saunders, Ken Bassett, Colin Dormuth, I Fan Kuo, Anshula Ambasta
{"title":"减少过度使用甲状腺功能检查的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Annabel Jane Chapman, Aneesa Khan, Jordyn Thompson, Vernon Curran, Jessica Otte, Sana Ghaznavi, Greg Carney, Kate Campbell, Vivian Lam, Caldon Saunders, Ken Bassett, Colin Dormuth, I Fan Kuo, Anshula Ambasta","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid function laboratory testing is often overused. Tailored de-implementation interventions require an understanding of underlying barriers and facilitators contributing to overuse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a mixed-methods study exploring barriers and facilitators of appropriate thyroid function testing using surveys and focus groups conducted between June and October 2023 in British Columbia, Canada. Quantitative survey data were summarised using simple statistics, and open-ended survey questions were summarised using summative content analysis. Focus group transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Key themes were mapped onto the combined Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>230 practitioners completed the survey (1.4% response rate), and 53 practitioners attended a total of six focus groups. Three themes emerged around barriers from synthesising the results: patient expectations, practitioner knowledge gaps and health system factors. Patient expectations were linked to non-specific symptoms, recommendations from alternate care providers, increased interest in hormone testing and internet searches, leading to patient requests for more testing and/or referrals to specialists. Knowledge gaps included use of specialised tests, interpretation of free hormone results, frequency of thyroid testing and screening in asymptomatic, pregnant and postpartum patients. Health system barriers included lack of practitioner time, lack of family doctors leading more patients to seek care from alternative providers, existing order sets and ordering processes, and existing culture of ordering practices. Identified facilitators of behaviour change towards appropriate thyroid testing included educational resources for practitioners and patients, leveraging of health information systems for seamless viewing of prior test results, reflexive testing and provision of personalised practitioner feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions to reduce overutilisation of thyroid testing should include easily accessible physician educational and feedback resources, patient educational materials and changes to laboratory ordering processes and information systems. Future studies should develop and evaluate the use of these intervention elements in British Columbia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to reducing overuse of thyroid function testing: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Annabel Jane Chapman, Aneesa Khan, Jordyn Thompson, Vernon Curran, Jessica Otte, Sana Ghaznavi, Greg Carney, Kate Campbell, Vivian Lam, Caldon Saunders, Ken Bassett, Colin Dormuth, I Fan Kuo, Anshula Ambasta\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid function laboratory testing is often overused. Tailored de-implementation interventions require an understanding of underlying barriers and facilitators contributing to overuse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a mixed-methods study exploring barriers and facilitators of appropriate thyroid function testing using surveys and focus groups conducted between June and October 2023 in British Columbia, Canada. Quantitative survey data were summarised using simple statistics, and open-ended survey questions were summarised using summative content analysis. Focus group transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Key themes were mapped onto the combined Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>230 practitioners completed the survey (1.4% response rate), and 53 practitioners attended a total of six focus groups. Three themes emerged around barriers from synthesising the results: patient expectations, practitioner knowledge gaps and health system factors. Patient expectations were linked to non-specific symptoms, recommendations from alternate care providers, increased interest in hormone testing and internet searches, leading to patient requests for more testing and/or referrals to specialists. Knowledge gaps included use of specialised tests, interpretation of free hormone results, frequency of thyroid testing and screening in asymptomatic, pregnant and postpartum patients. Health system barriers included lack of practitioner time, lack of family doctors leading more patients to seek care from alternative providers, existing order sets and ordering processes, and existing culture of ordering practices. Identified facilitators of behaviour change towards appropriate thyroid testing included educational resources for practitioners and patients, leveraging of health information systems for seamless viewing of prior test results, reflexive testing and provision of personalised practitioner feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions to reduce overutilisation of thyroid testing should include easily accessible physician educational and feedback resources, patient educational materials and changes to laboratory ordering processes and information systems. Future studies should develop and evaluate the use of these intervention elements in British Columbia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019042\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019042","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甲状腺功能实验室检测经常被过度使用。量身定制的去实施干预措施需要了解导致过度使用的潜在障碍和促进因素。方法:我们在2023年6月至10月期间在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省进行了一项混合方法研究,通过调查和焦点小组来探索适当甲状腺功能检测的障碍和促进因素。定量调查数据采用简单统计汇总,开放式调查问题采用总结性内容分析汇总。使用专题分析分析焦点小组记录。关键主题被映射到结合理论领域框架和能力,机会,动机-行为模型。结果:230名从业员完成调查(回应率1.4%),53名从业员参加了6个焦点小组。围绕综合结果的障碍出现了三个主题:患者期望、从业者知识差距和卫生系统因素。患者的期望与非特异性症状、替代护理提供者的建议、对激素测试和互联网搜索的兴趣增加有关,导致患者要求进行更多测试和/或转介给专家。知识差距包括使用专门测试、解释免费激素结果、对无症状患者、孕妇和产后患者进行甲状腺测试和筛查的频率。卫生系统障碍包括缺乏执业时间、缺乏家庭医生引导更多患者向其他提供者寻求治疗、现有的医嘱集和医嘱流程以及现有的医嘱实践文化。已确定的促进行为改变的因素包括为医生和患者提供教育资源,利用健康信息系统无缝查看先前的测试结果,反射性测试和提供个性化的医生反馈。结论:减少甲状腺检测过度使用的干预措施应包括易于获取的医师教育和反馈资源、患者教育材料以及改变实验室订购流程和信息系统。未来的研究应该开发和评估这些干预元素在不列颠哥伦比亚省的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to reducing overuse of thyroid function testing: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Thyroid function laboratory testing is often overused. Tailored de-implementation interventions require an understanding of underlying barriers and facilitators contributing to overuse.

Methods: We performed a mixed-methods study exploring barriers and facilitators of appropriate thyroid function testing using surveys and focus groups conducted between June and October 2023 in British Columbia, Canada. Quantitative survey data were summarised using simple statistics, and open-ended survey questions were summarised using summative content analysis. Focus group transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Key themes were mapped onto the combined Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model.

Results: 230 practitioners completed the survey (1.4% response rate), and 53 practitioners attended a total of six focus groups. Three themes emerged around barriers from synthesising the results: patient expectations, practitioner knowledge gaps and health system factors. Patient expectations were linked to non-specific symptoms, recommendations from alternate care providers, increased interest in hormone testing and internet searches, leading to patient requests for more testing and/or referrals to specialists. Knowledge gaps included use of specialised tests, interpretation of free hormone results, frequency of thyroid testing and screening in asymptomatic, pregnant and postpartum patients. Health system barriers included lack of practitioner time, lack of family doctors leading more patients to seek care from alternative providers, existing order sets and ordering processes, and existing culture of ordering practices. Identified facilitators of behaviour change towards appropriate thyroid testing included educational resources for practitioners and patients, leveraging of health information systems for seamless viewing of prior test results, reflexive testing and provision of personalised practitioner feedback.

Conclusions: Interventions to reduce overutilisation of thyroid testing should include easily accessible physician educational and feedback resources, patient educational materials and changes to laboratory ordering processes and information systems. Future studies should develop and evaluate the use of these intervention elements in British Columbia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信