Journal of forensic psychology practice最新文献_第4页

EOV Editorial Board EOV编委会

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1130486

引用次数: 0

Can Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to Coercive Interrogation Tactics? 专家证词能使陪审员对强制审讯策略敏感吗?

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029

Angela M. Jones, Steven D Penrod

{"title":"Can Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to Coercive Interrogation Tactics?","authors":"Angela M. Jones, Steven D Penrod","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Lay knowledge concerning false confession risk factors appears to be insufficient to safeguard against wrongful convictions, and research on false confession expert testimony has not led to a clear understanding of its impact on juror decision making. Thus, the current study sought to clarify whether expert testimony can induce sensitivity to a wide variety of false confession risk factors. Furthermore, jurors bring a variety of predispositions into the courtroom that may shape the way they view evidence. Yet, little research has evaluated the impact of individual differences in cases involving confession evidence. The current study assessed 330 participants’ self-reported likelihood of falsely confessing. These participants subsequently read an abbreviated criminal trial transcript where the defendant confessed to committing murder, but later recanted. We varied police use of four psychologically coercive interrogation techniques as well as the presence of expert testimony during the trial. Generally, participants were not sensitive to variations in the psychological coerciveness of the interrogation with or without an expert. However, self-reported likelihood of falsely confessing influenced perceptions of the detective and confession voluntariness, which in turn predicted verdict decisions. Increasing belief that one could falsely confess decreased the likelihood of conviction by decreasing perceptions of detective credibility and confession voluntariness. The results suggest the need to take into account individual differences of jurors who evaluate confession evidence. Current remedies may also need modification to assist jurors in deciphering confession evidence quality.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"393 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1232029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

The Impact of Careless and Random Responding on Juvenile Forensic Assessment: Susceptibility of Commonly Used Measures and Implications for Research and Practice 粗心和随机反应对青少年法医鉴定的影响:常用措施的敏感性及其对研究和实践的启示

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1234146

N. Cook, D. Faust, Joseph Meyer, K. Faust

{"title":"The Impact of Careless and Random Responding on Juvenile Forensic Assessment: Susceptibility of Commonly Used Measures and Implications for Research and Practice","authors":"N. Cook, D. Faust, Joseph Meyer, K. Faust","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1234146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1234146","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Forensic assessment experts and practice guidelines strongly endorse appraisal of response styles that can distort psychological assessment results and lead to serious interpretive errors, including careless and random responding (C/RR). Little attention has been directed to the implications of C/RR for juvenile forensic mental health assessment. To address this gap in the literature, we reviewed frequently used measures in juvenile forensic assessment. We found that many such measures do not include built-in checks for detecting C/RR. We then conducted simulation studies examining two frequently used measures, one without a built-in check for C/RR and one with such a scale: the Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory (MACI), respectively. Results indicated that random responding substantially influenced scores on the YSR, raising most scales well above normative levels, yet often producing protocols that seemed genuine. On the MACI, random responding was undetected 25% of the time and another 50% of the time appears to yield computer-based reports that do not explicitly reject the test results as invalid. Taken together, these simulations suggest that randomly generated assessment protocols may often be mistaken for genuine results. Implications for both practitioners and applied researchers involved in juvenile forensic assessment are discussed.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"425 - 447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1234146","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The Experience of Deniers on a Community Sex Offender Group Program 否认者在社区性犯罪者团体项目中的经历

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219

S. Watson, L. Harkins, M. Palmer

{"title":"The Experience of Deniers on a Community Sex Offender Group Program","authors":"S. Watson, L. Harkins, M. Palmer","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Approaches to treating sex offenders who deny their offense include treating deniers on mainstream treatment programs. In exploring the success of this approach, five deniers on the mainstream Community Sex Offender Group (CSOG) treatment program and five program facilitators were interviewed about their experience of such a group. Interviews considered whether denial impacts participants’ integration in the treatment group, their motivation and ability to participate, and their progress on treatment targets. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to analyze the data revealing themes associated with identity, feeling safe in the group, working on a hypothetical basis, and generalized benefits. Facilitators felt deniers were largely able to integrate into a mainstream treatment group, participate in treatment, and derive some benefit from the treatment. Similarly, deniers’ accounts suggest the experience of three of the five deniers reflected this, whereas two of the deniers experienced difficulties in all areas. The differences between these two groups are discussed.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"374 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Emotional Intelligence in Police Interviews—Approach, Training and the Usefulness of the Concept 警察采访中的情绪智力——方法、训练和概念的有用性

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1234143

Patrick Risan, P. Binder, R. Milne

引用次数: 17

A Critique of the Historical Clinical Risk–20, Version 3, Risk Assessment Instrument 历史临床风险- 20的批判，版本3，风险评估工具

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1196102

Rachel C. Judges, Vincent Egan, Grant Broad

引用次数: 12

Cognitive Insight, Clinical Insight, and Reasoning in Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study in a Forensic Setting 精神分裂症的认知洞察力、临床洞察力和推理:一项法医环境的初步研究

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1192337

Riitta Kuokkanen, R. Lappalainen, E. Repo‐Tiihonen, J. Tiihonen, K. Aho-Mustonen

引用次数: 9

Mental Health, Coping Styles, and Risk-Taking Behaviors in Young Adults 年轻人的心理健康、应对方式和冒险行为

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1196101

S. Khodarahimi, Rayhan Fathi

引用次数: 13

Legal Policies in Conflict: The Gay Panic Defense and Hate Crime Legislation 冲突中的法律政策:同性恋恐慌防御与仇恨犯罪立法

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1192331

J. Tomei, R. Cramer

引用次数: 5

Self-Reported Disorders Among Serial Homicide Offenders: Data From the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III 连环杀人案罪犯自我报告的精神障碍:来自百万临床多轴量表iii的数据

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-07-18 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1196099

Scott E. Culhane, Meagen M. Hildebrand, Austin F. Mullings, Janelle Klemm

{"title":"Self-Reported Disorders Among Serial Homicide Offenders: Data From the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III","authors":"Scott E. Culhane, Meagen M. Hildebrand, Austin F. Mullings, Janelle Klemm","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1196099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1196099","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This project reports the results of 60 male serial homicide offenders’ profiles on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III (MCMI-III). The geographical distance between potential participants increases the difficulty in effectively measuring psychological features. Therefore, self-report is a viable option for this type of research. Using a computer-generated correctional report, the Severe Personality Pathologies and Clinical Personality Patterns were analyzed for possible traits relating to Axis I and Axis II suggested diagnoses.1 Results show that the majority of murderers sampled had at least one Axis I classification and nearly half had more than one. All participants had either features or traits of an Axis II disorder, with slightly more than half having met the cutoff for a diagnosed disorder. The measurement of a highly violent specialized group requires many considerations and extensive resources, but a preliminary understanding is possible with a carefully gauged approach.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"268 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1196099","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14