Journal of forensic psychology practice最新文献_第3页

Examining Risk Factor and Recidivism Rate Differences Between Youth Adjudicated for Sex and Non-Sex Offenses: A Propensity Score Matching Approach 研究因性犯罪和非性犯罪而被判刑的青少年之间的风险因素和累犯率差异：倾向得分匹配法

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2024.2303644

William T. Miller, Christopher J. D’Amato, Amber A. Petkus, Christina A. Campbell, Eurielle Kiki

引用次数: 0

Impulsivity Profile in the Prison Population – a Comparative Case-Control Study 监狱人口的冲动特征——一项病例对照比较研究

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2290001

Kateřina Příhodová, Raffaele Fazio, Ladislav Kážmér, Tereza Příhodová, Steven R. Lawyer, Erin B. Rasmussen, Jan Vevera

引用次数: 0

Dirty Work: Addressing Moral Injury in Sex Offender Treatment Providers 肮脏的工作:解决性犯罪者治疗提供者的道德伤害

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2285975

Melinda DiCiro, Shoba Sreenivasan, Eugenia L. Weiss, Allen Azizian

引用次数: 0

An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of practitioners’ Experiences of Delivering a Mental Health Treatment Requirement, What Works to Engage Service Users and Facilitate Change 从业人员提供心理健康治疗需求的经验的解释性现象学分析，什么能吸引服务用户并促进变革

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2281432

Kate Walker, Chris Griffiths

引用次数: 0

The Effectiveness of Violence Reduction Therapy in Detained Adult Male Populations: Insights from a Systematic Review and Treatment Evaluation Capturing Individual Level Changes 在被拘留的成年男性人群中减少暴力治疗的有效性:来自系统回顾和捕获个体水平变化的治疗评估的见解

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2281425

Jane L. Ireland, Carol A. Ireland, Sophia Elianne Hynes

引用次数: 0

Dual Diagnosis in a Forensic Patient Sample: A Preliminary Tripartite Investigation to Inform Group Treatment Delivery for Substance Use 双重诊断在法医病人样本:一个初步的三方调查，以告知团体治疗交付的物质使用

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2023.2281431

Nishant Krishnan, Jane L. Ireland

引用次数: 0

Differences in Executive Function Between Batterers and Other Criminals 施虐者和其他罪犯执行功能的差异

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1219216

N. Bueso-Izquierdo, N. Hidalgo-Ruzzante, J. Daugherty, Carlos Burneo-Garcés, M. Pérez-García

引用次数: 9

Underdiagnosing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a State Hospital 州立医院创伤后应激障碍诊断不足

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1234142

Apryl A. Alexander, E. Welsh, D. Glassmire

引用次数: 9

Measuring Empathy in a German Youth Prison: A Validation of the German Version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a Sample of Incarcerated Juvenile Offenders 德国青少年监狱共情测量:德国版基本共情量表(BES)在在押青少年罪犯样本中的验证

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217

E. Heynen, G. Helm, G. Stams, A. Korebrits

{"title":"Measuring Empathy in a German Youth Prison: A Validation of the German Version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a Sample of Incarcerated Juvenile Offenders","authors":"E. Heynen, G. Helm, G. Stams, A. Korebrits","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Lack of empathy is related to aggression, delinquency, and criminal offense recidivism. The present study examined construct validity and reliability of the German version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) in a sample of 94 detained German male juvenile offenders (aged 14–26). A confirmatory factor analysis with a two-factor model of affective and cognitive empathy showed a good fit to the data. The factor structure of the original 20-item scale, however, could not be fully replicated in the German juvenile prison sample. Therefore, the scale was reduced to 12 items. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients were good for both affective and cognitive empathy. Concurrent validity of the BES was demonstrated only for cognitive empathy, which was significantly associated with callous-unemotional traits. Although results are promising, a replication study is needed to test concurrent, convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of the German version of the BES as well as test–retest reliability.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"336 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219217","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

Attributes of True and Deceptive Statements Made in Evaluations of Criminal Defendants 刑事被告人评价中真实陈述与虚假陈述的属性

Journal of forensic psychology practice Pub Date : 2016-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2016.1219218

S. A. Johnston, Alexis Candelier, Dana Powers-Green, Gabriel Johnston

{"title":"Attributes of True and Deceptive Statements Made in Evaluations of Criminal Defendants","authors":"S. A. Johnston, Alexis Candelier, Dana Powers-Green, Gabriel Johnston","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1219218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219218","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Court-ordered psychological evaluations of criminal defendants generally include two types: mental status (competence or sanity) versus risk assessment. When defendants are deceptive in mental status evaluations, lies of commission, in which symptoms of psychopathology are feigned (malingering), are most likely. When defendants are deceptive in risk assessments, lies of omission, in which antisocial impulses are concealed or denied, are most likely. Four research conditions, consisting of the true and false statements of two men accused of sex offenses and two men claiming an insanity defense, were rated by participants on a test of truthfulness containing eight items derived from Criterion-Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring. All items, as well as the collective test score, significantly differentiated between true and false statements. Further, the lie of commission was rated as significantly more false than the lie of omission, and a confession was rated as more truthful than a true statement involving only exculpatory information, which is in accordance with the theory of cognitive load. Factor analyses provided support for the construct validity of the test of truthfulness and two subscales. Further, the data suggests that statements judged true are characterized by the presence of attributes of truthfulness, while statements judged false are characterized by the absence of attributes of truthfulness along with the presence of attributes of untruthfulness.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"347 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219218","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59841179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1