否认者在社区性犯罪者团体项目中的经历

S. Watson, L. Harkins, M. Palmer
{"title":"否认者在社区性犯罪者团体项目中的经历","authors":"S. Watson, L. Harkins, M. Palmer","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Approaches to treating sex offenders who deny their offense include treating deniers on mainstream treatment programs. In exploring the success of this approach, five deniers on the mainstream Community Sex Offender Group (CSOG) treatment program and five program facilitators were interviewed about their experience of such a group. Interviews considered whether denial impacts participants’ integration in the treatment group, their motivation and ability to participate, and their progress on treatment targets. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to analyze the data revealing themes associated with identity, feeling safe in the group, working on a hypothetical basis, and generalized benefits. Facilitators felt deniers were largely able to integrate into a mainstream treatment group, participate in treatment, and derive some benefit from the treatment. Similarly, deniers’ accounts suggest the experience of three of the five deniers reflected this, whereas two of the deniers experienced difficulties in all areas. The differences between these two groups are discussed.","PeriodicalId":89973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"374 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Experience of Deniers on a Community Sex Offender Group Program\",\"authors\":\"S. Watson, L. Harkins, M. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Approaches to treating sex offenders who deny their offense include treating deniers on mainstream treatment programs. In exploring the success of this approach, five deniers on the mainstream Community Sex Offender Group (CSOG) treatment program and five program facilitators were interviewed about their experience of such a group. Interviews considered whether denial impacts participants’ integration in the treatment group, their motivation and ability to participate, and their progress on treatment targets. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to analyze the data revealing themes associated with identity, feeling safe in the group, working on a hypothetical basis, and generalized benefits. Facilitators felt deniers were largely able to integrate into a mainstream treatment group, participate in treatment, and derive some benefit from the treatment. Similarly, deniers’ accounts suggest the experience of three of the five deniers reflected this, whereas two of the deniers experienced difficulties in all areas. The differences between these two groups are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"374 - 392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic psychology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic psychology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1219219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

治疗否认犯罪的性犯罪者的方法包括在主流治疗项目中治疗否认者。为了探索这种方法的成功,我们采访了5位主流社区性犯罪者团体(CSOG)治疗项目的否认者和5位项目促进者,了解他们在这样一个团体中的经历。访谈考虑了否认是否影响参与者融入治疗组,他们参与的动机和能力,以及他们在治疗目标上的进展。解释现象学分析(IPA)用于分析揭示与身份相关的主题的数据,在群体中感到安全,在假设的基础上工作,以及普遍的利益。辅导员认为,否认者在很大程度上能够融入主流治疗群体,参与治疗,并从治疗中获得一些好处。同样,否认者的说法表明,五个否认者中有三个的经历反映了这一点,而否认者中的两个在所有领域都遇到了困难。讨论了这两组之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Experience of Deniers on a Community Sex Offender Group Program
ABSTRACT Approaches to treating sex offenders who deny their offense include treating deniers on mainstream treatment programs. In exploring the success of this approach, five deniers on the mainstream Community Sex Offender Group (CSOG) treatment program and five program facilitators were interviewed about their experience of such a group. Interviews considered whether denial impacts participants’ integration in the treatment group, their motivation and ability to participate, and their progress on treatment targets. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to analyze the data revealing themes associated with identity, feeling safe in the group, working on a hypothetical basis, and generalized benefits. Facilitators felt deniers were largely able to integrate into a mainstream treatment group, participate in treatment, and derive some benefit from the treatment. Similarly, deniers’ accounts suggest the experience of three of the five deniers reflected this, whereas two of the deniers experienced difficulties in all areas. The differences between these two groups are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信