Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists最新文献_第3页

“Going Pro”: the deferential effects of high aspirations for a professional sports career on African-American student athletes and White student athletes “走向职业”:对职业体育事业的高期望对非裔美国学生运动员和白人学生运动员的恭敬效应

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-05-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.006

Krystal Beamon, Patricia A Bell

{"title":"“Going Pro”: the deferential effects of high aspirations for a professional sports career on African-American student athletes and White student athletes","authors":"Krystal Beamon, Patricia A Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social scientists have long noted the effects of the images of the African-American male brought forth in popular culture. In fact, popular culture and organized sports have been credited as major contributors to many of the social problems that exist among African-American males. Those social problems are characterized in the oppositional relationship that has formed between athletic and academic achievement, and the high aspirations and expectations that African-American student athletes hold concerning professional sports. This study seeks to examine this phenomenon by identifying socializing agents<span> and influences in the lives of this group that may propel them into holding these beliefs. In addition, the academic and behavioral affects of holding these beliefs will be examined. Several independent and dependent variables were studied. The data was collected from a Division I football team through the use of a survey designed by the researchers. Several interesting findings were yielded concerning the effects of parental emphasis of sports during the socialization process and the high rates of African-American football players who held beliefs in a professional sports careers when compared to their White teammates. Additionally, those beliefs were found to affect academic achievement and behavior.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 179-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55150043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 43

We are all Americans!: the Latin Americanization of racial stratification in the USA 我们都是美国人!美国种族分层的拉丁美洲化

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.008

Eduardo Bonilla-Silva

引用次数: 149

Families on the color-line: patrolling borders and crossing boundaries 种族界线上的家庭:巡逻边界和跨越边界

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-04-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.001

Erica Chito Childs

{"title":"Families on the color-line: patrolling borders and crossing boundaries","authors":"Erica Chito Childs","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiracial couples and families are becoming increasingly more common, yet opposition to these relationships still exists even if it is often hidden in color-blind language. In this lingering societal opposition to black-white unions, the strongest opposition often comes from the couples’ families. The social institution of the family plays an integral role in reproducing the dominant ideologies of race that exist in society, and more specifically a racialized discourse that actively discourages interracial unions. Families reproduce racial boundaries, by patrolling who their members can and cannot become involved with. In our society where group membership is all-important and identity is based primarily on one’s racial group, families object to individuals from different “racial” groups redefining themselves apart from their racial identities. Drawing from in-depth interviews with black-white couples, the responses of their white and black families will be explored to illustrate how families express opposition to black-white interracial relationships. In both white and black families, certain discourses are used when discussing black-white relationships that reproduce the image of these unions as different, deviant, even dangerous. Interracial relationships and marriage often bring forth certain racialized attitudes and beliefs about family and identity which otherwise are not expressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 139-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 26

Rethinking epistemology, methodology, and racism: or, is White sociology really dead? 重新思考认识论、方法论和种族主义:白人社会学真的死了吗?

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-04-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.002

Margaret Hunter

{"title":"Rethinking epistemology, methodology, and racism: or, is White sociology really dead?","authors":"Margaret Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the influence of racial epistemologies on social science research methods and knowledge production. Neo-liberal understandings of positivism<span> and the institutional power that perpetuates them are criticized in favor of epistemological diversity in the academy. Drawing on the insider/outsider debate in sociology, particularly the dialogue with the “new Black sociology” movement of the 1970s, and feminist methodology and epistemology studies, the article outlines five typical racial epistemologies: (1) the Black/White racial epistemology, (2) the assimilationist epistemology, (3) the colonial domination epistemology, (4) the critical intersectional epistemology, and (5) the neo-liberal positivist epistemology. The author assesses the impact of each of the epistemologies on sociological research<span> and discusses how these racial “ways of knowing” affect the creation of research questions, choice of analytic categories, selection of sociological theories, analysis of data, and ultimately, the knowledge and power relations we re/produce.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 119-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 66

Searching for relief: racial differences in treatment of patients with back pain 寻求缓解:治疗背痛患者的种族差异

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-04-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004

Augustine J Kposowa , Glenn T Tsunokai

{"title":"Searching for relief: racial differences in treatment of patients with back pain","authors":"Augustine J Kposowa , Glenn T Tsunokai","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on analgesic prescriptions for back pain. Using 1995–1998 data from the U.S. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, significant racial disparities were observed in the odds of prescriptions. African American (OR=0.67, CI=0.55, 0.83) and Hispanic patients (OR=0.70, CI=0.52, 0.93) were significantly less likely to be given prescriptions for back pain treatment than their White counterparts. These two groups also received fewer medications on average than Whites. When the sample was stratified by sex, the racial differences were even more startling. African American men (OR=0.49, CI=0.35, 0.68) and Hispanic men (OR=0.51, CI=0.33, 0.79) were considerably less likely than White men to be given prescriptions for back pain. In addition, African American male patients were less likely to receive any medications (prescribed or non-prescribed) for pain. The above findings remained even after controlling for pain severity and payment source. The authors concluded that prejudice and racial stereotyping among physicians are the most plausible explanations for the racial/ethnic differences in pain treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 193-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

Race and social distance: intermarriage with non-Latino Whites 种族和社会距离:与非拉丁裔白人的通婚

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.003

Zhenchao Qian

{"title":"Race and social distance: intermarriage with non-Latino Whites","authors":"Zhenchao Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using 1990 census data, I examine variations in interracial marriage with non-Latino Whites among native- and foreign-born African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans. I further classify Latinos by race and national origin and Asian Americans by national origin. For each minority group, the native-born are much more likely to marry non-Latino Whites than the foreign-born. Interracial marriage with non-Latino Whites differ significantly by minority group: Latino Whites are most likely to marry non-Latino Whites, followed by Asian Americans, Latino non-Whites, and then African Americans. This suggests that race relations are no longer simply White and non-White. Skin tone of non-Whites plays a significant role in variations in intermarriage. Fair skinned minorities are more likely to marry Whites than darker skinned minorities. Skin tone, however, does not explain why persons of one Asian or Latino group have higher levels of intermarriage than those of another Asian or Latino group. To understand Latino and Asian American diversity, we need to take into account cultural differences in countries of origin as well as their divergent experiences in American society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 33-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 29

Where is the love? A rejoinder by Bonilla-Silva on the Latin Americanization thesis 爱在哪里?博尼拉-席尔瓦对拉丁美洲化论点的反驳

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.007

Eduardo Bonilla-Silva

引用次数: 6

An analysis of the Latin Americanization of race in the United States: a reconnaissance of color stratification among Mexicans 美国种族的拉丁美洲化分析:对墨西哥人肤色分层的考察

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.006

Edward Murguia, Rogelio Saenz

{"title":"An analysis of the Latin Americanization of race in the United States: a reconnaissance of color stratification among Mexicans","authors":"Edward Murguia, Rogelio Saenz","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Eduardo Bonilla-Silva has painted with broad strokes a portrait of the future of racial relations in the United States in his paper entitled, “We are all Americans: Toward a New System of Racial Stratification in the U.S.A.” [Race and Society (forthcoming)]. In essence, he sees the United States moving from a two-tier, black-white racial system toward a three-tier racial system where persons will be categorized as “white”, “honorary white”, or “collective black”. Additionally, Bonilla-Silva believes that we are moving from a system in which race is commonly taken into account, toward a system of “color-blind” racism. In this article, we closely examine Bonilla-Silva’s ideas, and although we appreciate the broad scale of his work and its challenge to traditional race relations, we make adjustments to his work, particularly concerning the location of Latinos in the U.S. racial hierarchy, which lead both to a better understanding of the current and future racial situation in the United States, and toward policy recommendations which could ameliorate the bleak situation in which we find ourselves concerning life chances of people of color.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 85-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 40

Neither Black nor White? An empirical test of the Latin Americanization thesis 既不黑也不白?拉丁美洲化理论的实证检验

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-03-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.005

Tyrone A. Forman , Carla Goar , Amanda E. Lewis

{"title":"Neither Black nor White? An empirical test of the Latin Americanization thesis","authors":"Tyrone A. Forman , Carla Goar , Amanda E. Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over the past four decades, demographic trends have provoked divergent perspectives concerning the future of race and ethnic relations in the United States. Despite the important implications of these differing interpretations of the future, social scientists have given them little empirical scrutiny. In this study, we systematically investigate one of these perspectives—Bonilla-Silva et al. [Research in Political Sociology 23 (2003) 111] Latin Americanization thesis. The Latin Americanization thesis posits that the United States is moving from a two-tier, White/non-White, racial stratification system toward a three-tier one that consists of the following categories: (1) White, (2) honorary White, and (3) collective Black. In this article, we empirically test one aspect of this thesis—the idea that members of the “White,” “honorary White” and “collective Black” categories will express social attitudes that reflect their status position in the newly emergent three-tier racial stratification system. We use a large nationally representative sample of non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans to assess this question. Our results lend qualified support to the Latin Americanization thesis. We conclude by considering the implications of these results for future research on contemporary racial dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 65-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 42

Bleaching out the color line? 漂白色线?

Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists Pub Date : 2002-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-03-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.002

Cedric Herring

{"title":"Bleaching out the color line?","authors":"Cedric Herring","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bonilla-Silva [Skin Deep: How Race and Color Matter in the “Color-Blind” Era, IRRPP and University of Illinois Press, Chicago and Urbana-Chapaign, IL, 2004, pp. 224–239] argues that “the U.S. is developing a tri-racial system with “Whites” at the top, an intermediary group of “honorary Whites,” and a non-White group or the “collective Black” at the bottom. His thesis provides a new, provocative explanation of how race will operate in 21st Century America. Using data from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality<span>, this article provides an analysis of propositions derived from three models of race as they relate to stratification outcomes: the “binary” (Black/White) model of race, Bonilla-Silva’s tripartite model of race, and a multi-ethnic model of race and ethnicity. The analysis points out that Whites and Blacks differ significantly on several stratification outcomes (e.g., education, occupational prestige, earnings, and family income), irrespective of the model of race that is used. The binary, Black/White model of race is still important in identifying baseline differences in who gets what. The results of the analysis further suggest that Bonilla-Silva’s tripartite model of race makes some apparent improvements on the binary model. In particular, the bivariate results were fully consistent with Bonilla-Silva’s tripartite model. Nevertheless, there are other stratification outcomes that do not strictly conform to the expectations of the tripartite model. The implications of these findings are examined briefly.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 1","pages":"Pages 17-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2003.12.002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"55149453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21