Searching for relief: racial differences in treatment of patients with back pain

Augustine J Kposowa , Glenn T Tsunokai
{"title":"Searching for relief: racial differences in treatment of patients with back pain","authors":"Augustine J Kposowa ,&nbsp;Glenn T Tsunokai","doi":"10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on analgesic prescriptions for back pain. Using 1995–1998 data from the U.S. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, significant racial disparities were observed in the odds of prescriptions. African American (OR=0.67, CI=0.55, 0.83) and Hispanic patients (OR=0.70, CI=0.52, 0.93) were significantly less likely to be given prescriptions for back pain treatment than their White counterparts. These two groups also received fewer medications on average than Whites. When the sample was stratified by sex, the racial differences were even more startling. African American men (OR=0.49, CI=0.35, 0.68) and Hispanic men (OR=0.51, CI=0.33, 0.79) were considerably less likely than White men to be given prescriptions for back pain. In addition, African American male patients were less likely to receive any medications (prescribed or non-prescribed) for pain. The above findings remained even after controlling for pain severity and payment source. The authors concluded that prejudice and racial stereotyping among physicians are the most plausible explanations for the racial/ethnic differences in pain treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88662,"journal":{"name":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 193-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.01.004","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race & society : Official journal of the Association of Black Sociologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090952404000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of race/ethnicity on analgesic prescriptions for back pain. Using 1995–1998 data from the U.S. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, significant racial disparities were observed in the odds of prescriptions. African American (OR=0.67, CI=0.55, 0.83) and Hispanic patients (OR=0.70, CI=0.52, 0.93) were significantly less likely to be given prescriptions for back pain treatment than their White counterparts. These two groups also received fewer medications on average than Whites. When the sample was stratified by sex, the racial differences were even more startling. African American men (OR=0.49, CI=0.35, 0.68) and Hispanic men (OR=0.51, CI=0.33, 0.79) were considerably less likely than White men to be given prescriptions for back pain. In addition, African American male patients were less likely to receive any medications (prescribed or non-prescribed) for pain. The above findings remained even after controlling for pain severity and payment source. The authors concluded that prejudice and racial stereotyping among physicians are the most plausible explanations for the racial/ethnic differences in pain treatment.

寻求缓解:治疗背痛患者的种族差异
本研究的目的是调查种族/民族对背痛止痛药处方的影响。使用1995-1998年美国国家医院门诊医疗调查的数据,在处方的几率上观察到显著的种族差异。非裔美国人(OR=0.67, CI=0.55, 0.83)和西班牙裔患者(OR=0.70, CI=0.52, 0.93)得到治疗背痛处方的可能性明显低于白人患者。这两组平均接受的药物也比白人少。当样本按性别分层时,种族差异更加惊人。非裔美国男性(OR=0.49, CI=0.35, 0.68)和西班牙裔男性(OR=0.51, CI=0.33, 0.79)比白人男性获得治疗背痛处方的可能性要小得多。此外,非裔美国男性患者接受任何药物(处方或非处方)治疗疼痛的可能性较小。即使在控制疼痛严重程度和支付来源后,上述结果仍然存在。作者得出结论,医生之间的偏见和种族刻板印象是对疼痛治疗中种族/民族差异最合理的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书