Nordisk psykologi最新文献

{"title":"Hyperansvar: når personligt ansvar gøres til genstand for styring","authors":"Hanne Knudsen, N. Andersen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I4.4721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I4.4721","url":null,"abstract":"I lobet af de sidste 10-15 ar er skolen begyndt at forvente af foraeldrene, at de tager et udefineret og graenselost personligt ansvar for deres born som skoleborn. Det personlige ansvar bliver dermed genstand for offentlig styring pa nye mader. I denne artikel undersoger vi, hvordan begrebet ansvar pavirkes af denne styring. Vi peger pa en forskydning i den made, foraeldrene tildeles ansvar, idet ansvar ikke laengere handler om at leve op til regler eller folge rad, men om at reflektere over om man har vaeret ansvarlig. Vi argumenterer for, at det, der skabes, er en form for hyperansvar, hvor ansvar handler om at deltage i offentlige refleksioner over sit potentielle ansvar. Vi argumenterer videre, at dette hyperansvar risikerer at true det, som reguleringen i udgangspunktet havde til ambition at fremme, nemlig personligt ansvar. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Hanne Knudsen and Niels Akerstrom Andersen: Hyper-Responsibility: When Personal Responsibility is Made the Object of Regulation \u0000 \u0000Over the past ten to fifteen years, state funded schools have begun to insist that parents take on an undefined and infinite personal responsibility for their children as school children. In this article we investigate how this development affects the concept of responsibility. We point to a dislocation in the way parents are assigned responsibility, because the definition of responsibility is not only a question of formulating rules or providing advice. We argue that what emerges is a kind of playful hyper responsibility that identifies responsibility as the participation in a process of public exploration by parents of the definition of their specific responsibilities. We also argue that this hyper-responsibility threatens that which the regulation intended to further, namely personal responsibility. \u0000 \u0000Key words: Responsibilization, home-school relations, parenting, deconstruction, governmentality, play.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"65-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68597062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Liberal eller liberalistisk frihetssosiologi? Replikk til Mikael Carleheden og Michael Hviid Jacobsen","authors":"Gunnar C. Aakvaag","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I4.4724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I4.4724","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"133-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68597230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Det affektive arbejde og adgangen til omsorg","authors":"K. Hjort","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4698","url":null,"abstract":"De sidste 20 ars diskussion af den kognitive okonomi er i dag aflost af diskussionen om udviklingen af en affektiv okonomi. Er det nye globale forretningsgrundlag blevet det immaterielle arbejde med at producere og regulere affekter? Gennem medier, markedsforing og management og i velfaerdsopgaver som uddannelse, sundhed og social sikring. Opgaver, der i Norden i det 20. arhundrede overvejende er blevet varetaget af kvinder i familierne og de offentlige institutioner. \u0000 Artiklens udgangspunkt er Michael Hardts kombination af kritisk teori og poststrukturalistisk konsforskning og beskriver, hvordan det affektive arbejde i dag organiseres globalt pa mader, der grundlaeggende udfordrer den nationalstatslige velfaerdsorganisering. AEndrede politiske og okonomiske vilkar betyder nye muligheder for hojtspecialiseret professionelt arbejde, der kan udvide menneskers livskapacitet naesten uendeligt, men ogsa intensivering, prioritering og selektion af klienter. \u0000 Fremtidens stridspunkt inden for velfaerd bliver sporgsmalet om adgang til omsorg. Det 21. arhundredes store sporgsmal bliver ikke frigorelse – at komme UD – men adgang – at komme IND – pa de arenaer, hvor diverse dele af sind og krop kan udfoldes og udvikles. Hvem besidder de adgangstegn – koder og kort, diagnoser og diplomer – der giver mulighed for at modtage og udove det excellente? Og hvem gor ikke? Liv og dod bliver pa nye mader en politisk beslutning. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Katrin Hjort: Affective Labor and Access to Care \u0000 \u0000The last 20 years’ discussion of the cognitive economy has been sidestepped by a discussion of an affective economy. Are immaterial labor production and regulation affects in fields such as media, marketing and management and in welfare tasks as education, social security and health service the new platform for global business? In the Nordic countries these tasks have largely been carried out by women in families and public institutions as respectively informal and formal labor. This article draws on Michael Hardt´s combination of critical theory and poststructuralist gender research, and describes how affective work is organized globally today in ways that fundamentally challenge the organization of welfare at the national level. Changing conditions mean new opportunities for highly specialized professional work, which can extend the human life capacity almost indefinitely, but can also result in prioritization and selection of clients. The crucial issue for the future is “access to care”. The big question of the 21.century is not freedom – how to get OUT – but access – how to get IN – to the arenas where various parts of mind and body can be unfolded. Who has the access cards – codes and cards, diagnoses and diplomas – which allow them to receive and exercise the excellence? And who does not? Life and death are becoming political decisions in new ways. \u0000 \u0000Key words: Affective work, affective economy, globalization in welfare, access to excellence.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"129 1","pages":"85-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68597300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Guvernementalisering af velfærdsprofessionerne","authors":"Lars Thorup Larsen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4696","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4696","url":null,"abstract":"Traditionelt opfattes professioners autonomi som en direkte folge af den viden, de besidder, samt af de saerlige opgaver denne viden tillader dem at lose, ikke mindst for staten. Denne autonomi er imidlertid sat under pres igennem talrige bolger af reformer i velfaerdsstaten, hvad enten der er tale om reformer med henblik pa bedre opgavevaretagelse eller om simple nedskaeringer. Mens det er velbeskrevet i professionslitteraturen, hvorledes velfaerdsreformer forsoger at regulere de professionelles okonomiske interesser, fx igennem New Public Management-inspirerede tiltag, soger denne artikel at vise en anden type udfordring af professionel autonomi. Pastanden er, at velfaerdsprofessioner som fx laerere eller socialradgivere er blevet gjort til agenter for politiske strategier pa hvert sit policyomrader og det pa en mere direkte og systematisk made end tidligere. Inspireret af Foucault karakteriseres denne udvikling i artiklen som en ”guvernementalisering” af velfaerdsprofessionerne. Det betyder, at professionernes viden og identitet soges orienteret systematisk efter, hvorledes den professionelle bor lede borgerne i overensstemmelse med centrale politiske ambitioner pa omradet. Frem for at vaere agent for professionens egne paedagogiske principper kan en paedagog ifolge denne logik i stedet blive agent i en integrationspolitisk dagsorden, mens skolelaererens professionelle praksis bliver systematisk orienteret efter centrale konkurrencepolitiske mal. Artiklen bestar af en indledende udvikling af begrebet om guvernementalisering efterfulgt af en tekstanalyse, der applicerer begrebet pa centrale dokumenter omkring indholdet af fire velfaerdsprofessioner i en dansk kontekst, nemlig skolelaerere, paedagoger, socialradgivere og sygeplejersker. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Lars Thorup Larsen: The ”Governmentalization” of the Welfare Professions \u0000 \u0000The autonomy of professions is traditionally based on the knowledge required for the profession and the specific work that this knowledge enables professionals to carry out, not least for the (welfare) state. Waves of welfare state reform have put this autonomy under pressure, however, whether the reforms are aimed at efficiency or are simply cutbacks. A growing amount of literature about these professions shows how political reforms try to regulate the economic incentives of professionals, for example through initiatives inspired by New Public Management. This paper aims to show a different type of challenge to professional autonomy. It argues that welfare professionals such as teachers or social workers have become agents of new political strategies in their respective policy areas, and in a more direct and systematic way than previously. With inspiration from Foucault, this can be characterized as a “governmentalization” of the welfare professions. It means that both professional knowledge and identity become systematically restructured according to how the state would like professionals to govern its citizens","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"37-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Profession, holdning og habitus: Forholdet mellem pædagogers og forældres holdninger til pædagogiske spørgsmål i daginstitutioner","authors":"Morten Ejrnæs, Merete Monrad","doi":"10.22439/dansoc.v24i3.4697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/dansoc.v24i3.4697","url":null,"abstract":"Uoverensstemmelser mellem paedagoger og smabornsforaeldre i daginstitutioner kan vaere afgorende for foraeldresamarbejdet, foraeldrenes tilfredshed og paedagogernes arbejdsliv. Sadanne uoverensstemmelser eller deciderede konflikter kan opsta af forskellige arsager. Saerligt kan forskelle i gruppernes viden om born, interessekonflikter og vaerdikonflikter gore sig gaeldende. I denne artikel undersoger vi vaerdikonflikter mellem paedagoger og smabornsforaeldre igennem en holdningsundersogelse. Det har ikke tidligere vaeret undersogt, hvor ens eller hvor forskellige foraeldres og paedagogers holdninger til konkrete paedagogiske sporgsmal er. I to kvantitative vignetundersogelser gennemfort med et repraesentativt udsnit af paedagoger og smabornsforaeldre sammenlignes de to gruppers holdninger. Undersogelserne viser overordnet, at de to gruppers holdninger er meget ens. I forhold til en del sporgsmal har majoriteten inden for bade paedagoggruppen og foraeldregruppen samme holdning, mens begge grupper i andre sporgsmal er splittede internt, men pa nogenlunde samme made. Der er saledes ikke belaeg for, at der forekommer vaerdikonflikter mellem professionsgruppen og brugergruppen. De empiriske resultater diskuteres i forhold til organisations- og professionsteoretiske tilgange samt i forhold til forskellige Bourdieu-inspirerede referencerammer, der har vaeret almindelige i studiet af relationsprofessioner i Danmark. Pa denne baggrund argumenteres for, at eksisterende tilgange til studiet af relationsprofessioner ma modificeres, sa de kan rumme bade holdningsdiversiteten blandt professionelle og ligheder i holdningsmonstre professionsgruppen og brugergruppen imellem. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Morten Ejrnaes and Merete Monrad: Profession, Attitude and Habitus: The Relationship between Parents’ and Teachers’ Attitudes concerning Pedagogical Issues in Day Care Institutions \u0000 \u0000Disagreements between child care professionals and parents in day care institutions can be important for their cooperation, for the satisfaction of parents and for the working life of the professionals. Disagreements or conflicts may arise because of differences in knowledge, conflicting interests and conflicting values. In this article we examine value conflicts between child care professionals and parents by using a study of attitudes. Similarities and differences between parents’ and professionals’ attitudes regarding specific pedagogical questions have not been examined previously. The attitudes of the two groups are compared through two quantitative vignette studies. The results show that the attitudes of the two groups resemble each other. The majority of both groups hold similar attitudes on a wide range of questions, while both groups are internally divided in much the same way regarding other questions. Thus, there is no evidence for the existence of value conflicts between professionals and parents. The empirical results are discussed in terms of theories of organizations and ","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"63-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68597184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hvem læser på velfærdsprofessionsuddannelserne? – ændringer i rekrutteringsmønstre de sidste 25 år","authors":"J. Thomsen, Siri Dencker, Thomas Mørch Pedersen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I3.4695","url":null,"abstract":"Denne artikel beskaeftiger sig med den generelle udvikling i den sociale rekruttering til de videregaende uddannelser i Danmark de sidste 30 ar og saetter saerlig fokus pa, hvilke sociale grupper velfaerdsprofessionerne rekrutterer fra, sammenlignet med ovrige videregaende uddannelser. Velfaerdsprofessionerne er interessante, fordi de indtager en central rolle i forhold til at opretholde vitale funktioner i velfaerdssamfundet. De seneste ar har vaeret praeget af en debat om, hvorvidt disse semiprofessioner har oplevet et relativt statustab set i forhold til de ovrige videregaende uddannelser. Vi undersoger aendringer i adgangen til velfaerdsprofessionsuddannelserne og de ovrige videregaende uddannelser gennem en raekke statistiske modeller pa baggrund af registerdata fra perioden 1989-2011. Vi finder, at den sociale ulighed, eller sociale selektivitet, i adgangen til videregaende uddannelser generelt er mindsket over arene, men primaert i de perioder hvor uddannelserne ekspanderer. Vi finder videre, at den sociale selektivitet i udgangspunktet er ganske forskellig afhaengig af, om vi betragter de selektive lange videregaende uddannelser eller de mindre selektive velfaerdsprofessionsuddannelser (hvor paedagoguddannelsen er den mindst selektive af de fire behandlede velfaerdsprofessionsuddannelser). \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Jens Peter Thomsen, Siri Dencker and Thomas Morch Pedersen: Changes in Access to Higher Education and Welfare Professional Educations in Denmark 1989-2011 \u0000 \u0000In this paper we examine the social backgrounds of the individuals enrolled in welfare professional educations in Denmark. We ask if there have been significant changes in enrollments in these educations relative to other higher educations during the past 30 years? Can we find evidence of a purported status loss of these professional educations relative to other professions? This paper addresses these questions by applying various regression models using Danish register data from 1989 to 2011. It is shown that: 1. Social inequality in access to higher education has been on the decline during 1989-2011, but only in times of educational expansion. 2. Social selectivity in access to welfare professional educations differs, all of these educations being significantly less selective than university education. \u0000 \u0000Key words: Inequality in access to higher education by social origin, educational expansion, higher education programmes, access to welfare professional programmes.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"11-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Teologi og sociologi: Pave Benedikt XVI som social kritiker og moderniseringsteoretiker","authors":"Bjørn Thomassen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4591","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"105-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Samfundsvidenskaber: Politiske holdninger og ytringsfrihed","authors":"H. Andersen","doi":"10.22439/dansoc.v24i2.4592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/dansoc.v24i2.4592","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"127-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Det utilstrækkelige subjekt: En foucauldiansk analyse af selvhjælpslitterær selvstyring","authors":"Erik Mygind du Plessis","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4587","url":null,"abstract":"Denne artikel undersoger, hvordan bestemte personlighedstraek soges problematiseret og kultiveret i moderne selvhjaelpslitteratur. Undersogelsen, som har et saerligt fokus pa autonomi, traekker teoretisk pa Michel Foucaults begreb problematisering samt Foucaults tanker om governmentality og selvstyring. Artiklen kombinerer disse analytiske perspektiver i et forsog pa at vise, hvordan det autonome subjekt forsoges kultiveret pa trods af det paradoks der indtraeder, nar kultiveringen sker gennem subjektets underkasten sig litteraturens anvisninger. Det konkluderes i artiklen, at problemer i selvhjaelpslitteraturen generelt formuleres som forskellige typer mangler, der som losning indebaerer konstant udvikling hen mod et mal om selvrealisering, som aldrig helt kan opnas. Subjektet subjektiveres dermed som et ufaerdigt projekt, der aldrig er helt godt nok, og som altid har brug for forbedring. Dette gaelder ogsa for autonomi som problem, og i artiklens anden halvdel vises det, hvordan den allestedsnaervaerende ufuldendthed ved subjektet manifesterer sig i paradokset, hvor subjektet bor vaere selvstaendigt, autonomt og handle ud fra sin egne overbevisninger, men samtidig udleder denne evne til at handle autonomt fra de samme autoriteter, som det bor vaere autonomt fra. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Erik Mygind du Plessis: The Inadequate Subject: Self-Help Literature and the Government of the Self – a Foucauldian Analysis \u0000 \u0000This article investigates how current self-help literature seeks to problematize and cultivate certain personality traits. The study emphasizes individual autonomy, and is based on an analytical framework employing Michel Foucault’s concept of problematization and his insights into power and governmentality – particularly those concerned with the various ways in which subjects govern themselves. The article combines these two analytical perspectives in an attempt to show how the objective of creating autonomous subjects is carried out in this literature, despite the paradoxical nature of doing so through the readers’ subjection to self-help instructions. The analysis concludes that the problems taken up in the self-help literature are generally formulated in terms of various forms of incompleteness. This entails a constant and never ending development towards, as a final objective, a self-realization, which can never quite be achieved. Thus the subject is construed as an unfinished project that is never quite good enough, always requiring improvement. The second part of the article analyses how this ubiquitous incompleteness of the subject manifests itself through the paradox of creating autonomy through subjection. \u0000 \u0000Key words: Foucault, problematization, self-help, autonomy.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"26 1","pages":"11-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Når hudfarven forsvinder: Hvordan etnisk blandede folkeskoler skaber tillid til indvandrere","authors":"C. Larsen, Morten Ringgaard, Prashanth Kantharooban, Aynkaran Anton Senthilnathan, Tim Sloth Johansen, John Linaa Holbøll","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V24I2.4589","url":null,"abstract":"Artiklen analyserer, hvorvidt blandede skoler skaber tillid mellem etniske danskere og indvandrere. Ved hjaelp af et eksperimentelt design dokumenteres det, at etnisk danske born pa homogene ”hvide” skoler har mindre tillid til personer med anden hudfarve, mens den tilsvarende effekt er fravaerende blandt etnisk danske born pa heterogene skoler. Det stotter den sakaldte kontakthypotese og afkraefter den sakaldte konflikthypotese. Der var ikke en klar effekt fra venskabsrelationer pa tvaers af hudfarve og erfaring med ikke-hvide laerere. Derfor argumenteres for, at effekten skal forklares med, at heterogene skoler ophaever graensedragninger mellem ind- og ud-grupper baseret pa hudfarve. Endelig viser artiklen, at effekten fra hudfarve er signifikant mindre hos elever, der er socialiseret til at vaere tillidsfulde. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000ENGELSK ABSTRACT: \u0000 \u0000Christian Albrekt Larsen, Morten Ringgaard, Prashanth Kantharooban, Aynkaran Anton Senthilnathan, Tim Sloth Johansen and John Linaa Holboll: \u0000When Skin Color Disappears: How Ethnically Mixed Public Schools Create Trust of Immigrants \u0000 \u0000The article examines the extent to which ethnically mixed schools generate trust between ethnic Danes and immigrants. It is based on an experimental research design. Ethnic Danes in homogeneous “white” schools have less trust in “non-white” persons, while this is not the case in ethnically mixed schools. The results support the contact-thesis and contradict the conflict-thesis of trust in immigrants. This effect cannot be explained by stronger inter-ethnic friendships or experience with non-Danish teachers. The article argues that the most plausible explanation of these results is that the pupils in the mixed schools simply do not apply skin color in constructing in- and out-groups. The analysis also shows that the negative effect of skin color is weaker among pupils with a general disposition to trust. \u0000 \u0000Key words: Contact thesis, conflict thesis, mixed schools, trust, experimental design.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"24 1","pages":"59-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68596529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}