{"title":"Asymptotic modelling of viscoelastic von Kármán membrane shells","authors":"M. Legougui, A. Ghezal","doi":"10.1515/anly-2022-1106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anly-2022-1106","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The objective of this work is to study the asymptotic justification of the two-dimensional model of viscoelastic von Kármán membrane shells. More precisely, we consider a three-dimensional model for a nonlinearly viscoelastic membrane shell with a specific class of boundary conditions of von Kármán type. Using techniques from formal asymptotic analysis with the thickness of the shell as a small parameter, we show that the scaled three-dimensional solution still leads to the two-dimensional model of viscoelastic von Kármán membrane shells.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80512519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pseudo-n-multipliers and pseudo-n-Jordan multipliers","authors":"A. Zivari-kazempour, M. Valaei","doi":"10.1515/anly-2021-1009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anly-2021-1009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we introduce the concepts of pseudo-n-multiplier and pseudo-n-Jordan multiplier on Banach algebras and compare those with the classical notions of n-multiplier and n-Jordan multiplier. We show that under special hypotheses every pseudo- ( n + 1 ) {(n+1)} -Jordan multiplier is a pseudo-n-Jordan multiplier and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"154 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75841759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The exterior differential operator on quasi-Kähler manifolds and some relations of its components for smooth functions","authors":"Masaya Kawamura","doi":"10.1515/anly-2023-0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anly-2023-0014","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigate the exterior differential operator on quasi-Kähler manifolds and show some relations of its components for smooth functions.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74899789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Against epistemic accounts of luck","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad066","url":null,"abstract":"Epistemic accounts of luck define luck’s chanciness condition relative to a subject’s epistemic position. This could be put in terms of a subject’s evidence or knowledge about whether the event will occur. I argue that both versions of the epistemic account fail. In section 1, I give two types of counterexamples to the evidence-based approach. In section 2, I argue—contrary to the knowledge-based view—that an event can be a matter of good or bad luck for a subject even if she knows that it will occur. In section 3, I argue that epistemic accounts cannot explain some instances of constitutive luck. Because of these problems, luck’s chanciness condition cannot be adequately defined epistemically. Luck is typically defined in terms of two necessary and jointly significant conditions: significance and chance. One way of capturing the sense in which a lucky event is chancy is via an epistemic condition. More precisely, epistemic accounts of luck define luck’s chanciness condition relative to a subject’s epistemic position. This could be put in terms of a subject’s evidence (for example, Stoutenburg 2015, 2019, 2020) or knowledge (for example, Steglich-Petersen 2010, 2020) about whether the event will occur.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88281648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Are good leaders truly good?","authors":"Susumu Cato, A. Inoue","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad001","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper offers a new insight on the Condorcet Jury Theorem (CJT) in the theory of epistemic democracy. This theorem states that democratic decision-making leads us to correct outcomes under certain assumptions. One key assumption is the ‘independence condition’, which requires that voters form their beliefs independently when they vote. This paper examines the role of an opinion leader as an informational source, which potentially violates independence. We demonstrate that voters’ beliefs may be correlated in the presence of the leader, and that the CJT can fail if the leader’s opinions are reliable. This leads us to the following paradoxical observation: for epistemic democracy, good leaders may be bad, while bad leaders may be good.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78368805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A novel Process Reliabilist response to the Swamping Problem","authors":"Sanford Goldberg","doi":"10.1093/analys/anac062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anac062","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper aims to provide a novel response on behalf of Process Reliabilism to the Swamping Problem. Unlike previous responses, the present response does not involve conditional probabilities (as Goldman and Olsson do), it does not appeal to permissivism or attitudes towards epistemic risk (as Pettigrew does), it will not depend on the generality of the problem (as Carter and Jarvis do) and it does not embrace either evidentialism or evidence monism (as Bjelde does). Instead it appeals to the modal properties of those beliefs formed through reliable process-types. What is more, the argument is generalizable: while I will frame my conclusion in Process Reliabilist terms, it should be of interest to anyone who is a truth monist regarding epistemic value.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83705956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Neppur si muove! Reply to Correia and Rosenkranz","authors":"Roberto Loss","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Correia and Rosenkranz have recently argued in Analysis (2020, 2022) that tense realism (understood as the view that there is a real difference between past, present and future) entails realism about temporal passage (and thus the idea that there is some change in which time is the present time). I argue that their argument is either unsound or question-begging.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78046028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The procreation asymmetry, improvable-life avoidance and impairable-life acceptance","authors":"E. Thornley","doi":"10.1093/analys/anac103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anac103","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Many philosophers are attracted to a complaints-based theory of the procreation asymmetry, according to which creating a person with a bad life is wrong (all else equal) because that person can complain about your act, whereas declining to create a person who would have a good life is not wrong (all else equal) because that person never exists and so cannot complain about your act. In this paper, I present two problems for such theories: the problem of impairable-life acceptance and an especially acute version of the problem of improvable-life avoidance. I explain how these problems afflict two recent complaints-based theories of the procreation asymmetry, from Joe Horton and Abelard Podgorski.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82676556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does the unity of reason imply that epistemic justification is factive?","authors":"Jaakko Hirvelä","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Some externalists have recently argued that the unity of theoretical and practical reason implies that epistemic justification is factive. It is argued that arguments for the factivity of epistemic justification either (i) equate two actions that are in fact different, or (ii) make the unwarranted assumption that the by-relation transmits justification. The unity of reason does not imply that epistemic justification is factive.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82064682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Results concerning multi-index Wright generalized Bessel function","authors":"N. Khan, M. Iqbal Khan","doi":"10.1515/anly-2023-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anly-2023-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we get certain integral representations of the multi-index Wright generalized Bessel function by making use of the extended beta function. This function is presented as a part of the generalized Bessel–Maitland function obtained by taking the extended fractional derivative of the generalized Bessel–Maitland function developed by Özarsalan and Özergin [M. Ali Özarslan and E. Özergin, Some generating relations for extended hypergeometric functions via generalized fractional derivative operator, Math. Comput. Model. 52 2010, 9–10, 1825–1833]. In addition, we demonstrate the exciting connections of the multi-index Wright generalized Bessel function with Laguerre polynomials and Whittaker function. Further, we use the generalized Wright hypergeometric function to calculate the Mellin transform and the inverse of the Mellin transform.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82278548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}