Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Combined positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced CT (PET/CeCT) is a feasible single investigation in the staging of oesophagogastric cancers: single-centre pilot study experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. 联合正电子发射断层扫描和增强CT (PET/CeCT)是一种可行的食管胃癌分期的单一研究:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的单中心试点研究经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070
M Jones, S Higgs, S Dwerryhouse, V Markos, K Mason, C Green, A Nawwar, J Searle, I Lyburn
{"title":"Combined positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced CT (PET/CeCT) is a feasible single investigation in the staging of oesophagogastric cancers: single-centre pilot study experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"M Jones, S Higgs, S Dwerryhouse, V Markos, K Mason, C Green, A Nawwar, J Searle, I Lyburn","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Staging of oesophagogastric (OG) cancers usually involves endoscopy (OGD), and separate visits for contrast enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) and positron emission tomography (PET/CT). At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, some of our patients underwent single-visit combined staging with PET/CeCT. We compare this novel pathway with standard separate imaging in time to completion of staging, to start of treatment, and cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all patients discussed at our OG multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting in 2020. Clinical records revealed dates of investigations and treatments. Data were tabulated in Excel, with statistical analysis in SPSS. All patients followed the same MDT process and image reviewing criteria. Costs were compared using prices supplied by finance departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 new patients were discussed at our MDT in 2020. Of these, 48 patients had combined PET/CeCT staging, and 68 had separate scans. Median time (interquartile range) in days from OGD to final imaging was 9 (6-23) for the combined group versus 21 (16-28) for the separate group (<i>p</i>≤0.001). Median time (days) from OGD to treatment start was 37 (29-52) for combined versus 55 (40-71) for separate (<i>p</i>≤0.001). No combined scans were of insufficient diagnostic quality for the MDT. PET/CeCT had a potential cost saving of £113 per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET/CeCT allows accurate radiological staging of OG cancers with a single scan. Patients completed staging and started treatment faster, with a potential saving of £10,509 in one year. PET/CeCT has become standard staging at our trust, and we aim to incorporate radiotherapy planning images too.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"576-584"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138046059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgery for phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Current practice in the United Kingdom. phaeochromocytomas 和 paragangliomas 的手术治疗:英国的当前实践。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054
A Bojoga, S P Balasubramanian, R Mihai
{"title":"Surgery for phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Current practice in the United Kingdom.","authors":"A Bojoga, S P Balasubramanian, R Mihai","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is wide variability in the perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) in different centres. This study aimed to summarise the management of PPGLs as reported in the United Kingdom Registry for Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS) database and to determine current perioperative management of PPGLs by surveying UK clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data recorded on UKRETS from 2005 to 2021 were subjected to descriptive analyses. British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons members were invited to participate in an open survey relating to the perioperative management of patients with PPGLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,007 operations for PPGL from 49 participating centres were included. The median annual workload in each centre was four cases. Operations were performed predominantly laparoscopically (69%). The median length of stay (4 days) was the same in groups of surgeons stratified by volume. The survey had 29 respondents from 22 centres across the UK, and a formal protocol for perioperative management exists in 48% of the centres. Phenoxybenzamine (72%) was preferred for alpha-blockade. The practice of admitting patients for optimisation from 1 to 7 days before the day of surgery was common (62%). Central venous pressure and blood glucose monitoring were mentioned as routine intraoperative adjuncts by 72% of the responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variation in the workload and perioperative management of PPGLs in the UK. This is potentially detrimental to patient outcomes and a consensus document might be beneficial to harmonise practice across the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"620-627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of a pilot of a community virtual triage for breast symptoms outside of usual primary or secondary care pathways. 在常规初级或二级护理路径之外,对社区乳腺症状虚拟分诊试点进行评估。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094
S Laws, K Spiller, C Glew
{"title":"Evaluation of a pilot of a community virtual triage for breast symptoms outside of usual primary or secondary care pathways.","authors":"S Laws, K Spiller, C Glew","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both primary and secondary care services in the NHS have been overwhelmed with an increase in referrals on the suspected cancer pathways. The years 2020/2021 saw 551,770 symptomatic breast referrals made in England alone. The Wessex Rapid investigations service in conjunction with the local district general hospital and primary care networks instigated a virtual triage for new breast symptoms. Over the course of a year, 664 people were assessed by either telephone or video using specially trained nurses. Appointments were given within 1-2 working days. The service was highly valued by patients and general practitioners. We were unable to confirm a reduction in referral to secondary care as the evaluation occurred during a postpandemic peak in referrals. We found that 10% of patients with new breast symptoms can safely self-manage. This percentage varied with the experience of the triage clinician. A specialist community face-to-face service could reduce further the need for full secondary care evaluation. Better integration and use of information technology systems would improve the service. The rapid responsiveness and length of consultations is valued by patients. Representation with the same symptoms was rare. This pathway utilises staff outside of the usual primary and secondary care providers and thus reduces the pressure on stretched systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"596-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139970813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process. 急诊胆囊切除术的范式转变:Chole-QuiC过程的一个部位经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084
M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa
{"title":"Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.","authors":"M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; <i>p</i>=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; <i>p</i>=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; <i>p</i>=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; <i>p</i>=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"601-609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term efficacy of total versus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 胃食管反流病患者完全胃底折叠术与后部胃底折叠手术的长期疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046
D V Peristeri, H Room, D Tsironis, G Vasilikostas, A Wan
{"title":"Long-term efficacy of total versus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"D V Peristeri, H Room, D Tsironis, G Vasilikostas, A Wan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic fundoplication remains the standard treatment for patients with severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the two most commonly performed surgical techniques, total and posterior partial fundoplication (Nissen [NF] and Toupet [TF]), in terms of symptom control and treatment failure in patients without subsequent dysmotility disorders. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of these two techniques with regard to the long-term effect on reflux control and associated dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE<sup>®</sup>, Embase<sup>®</sup>, PubMed<sup>®</sup> and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and all the relevant published RCTs were shortlisted according to the inclusion criteria. The summated outcomes of long-term results relating to the recurrence of GORD and dysphagia were evaluated in a meta-analysis using RevMan software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (all RCTs) on 1,545 patients undergoing NF or TF were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. There were 799 patients in the NF group and 746 in the TF group. In the random effects model analysis, the incidence of long-term recurrence of GORD was not statistically different between the NF and TF cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-1.41, z=1.01, <i>p</i>=0.31). However, the incidence of long-term dysphagia was statistically lower in the TF group (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.49-5.72, z=3.13, <i>p</i>=0.002) with low between-study heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis on symptomatic GORD appear to be in favour of partial posterior fundoplication (TF) as the optimal treatment. It provides equivalent outcomes in reflux symptom control with a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with total fundoplication (NF).</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"569-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41231883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CORESS Feedback: Cases from the Confidential Reporting System for Surgery. CORESS 反馈:来自外科手术保密报告系统的病例。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074
H Corbett
{"title":"CORESS Feedback: Cases from the Confidential Reporting System for Surgery.","authors":"H Corbett","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CORESS is an independent charity, supported by AXA Health, the MDU and the Kirby Laing Foundation. We are grateful to those who have provided the material for these reports. The online reporting form is available via the CORESS app and on the website (coress.org.uk), which also includes previous Feedback reports. Published cases are acknowledged by a Certificate of Contribution, which may be included in the contributor's record of continuing professional development, or which may form part of appraisal or annual review of competence progression portfolio documentation. Contributions from surgeons in training are particularly welcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"106 7","pages":"652-656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Operative and non-operative management for intestinal emergencies: findings from a single-centre retrospective cohort study. 肠急症的手术和非手术治疗:一项单中心回顾性队列研究的结果
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093
A R Darbyshire, I Kostakis, P Meredith, C Kovacs, D Prytherch, J Briggs, Skc Toh
{"title":"Operative and non-operative management for intestinal emergencies: findings from a single-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"A R Darbyshire, I Kostakis, P Meredith, C Kovacs, D Prytherch, J Briggs, Skc Toh","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with an intestinal emergency who do not have surgery are poorly characterised. This study used electronic healthcare records to provide a rapid insight into the number of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency and compare short-term outcomes for non-operative and operative management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary NHS hospital (from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2020). Patients were identified using diagnosis codes for intestinal emergencies, based on the inclusion criteria for the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Relevant data were extracted from electronic healthcare records (<i>n</i>=3,997).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency received nonoperative management (43.7%). Of those who underwent surgery, 63.7% were started laparoscopically. The non-operative group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 5.4 days vs 8.2 days [started laparoscopically] or 16.8 days [started open]) and fewer unintended intensive care admissions than the surgical group (2.4% vs 8.7% [started laparoscopically] 21.1% [started open]). However, 30-day mortality for non-operative treatment was double that for surgery (22.4% vs 10.1%). The 30-day mortality rate was found to be even higher for non-operative management (50.3%) compared with surgery (19.5%) in a sub-analysis of patients with admission National Early Warning Score ≥4 (<i>n</i>=683).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients with intestinal emergencies who do not have surgery is greater than expected, and it appears that many respond well to non-operative treatment. However, 30-day mortality for non-operative management was high, and the low number of admissions to intensive care suggests that major invasive treatment was not appropriate for most in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"585-591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs operative fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 肱骨近端骨折逆行全肩关节置换术与手术固定的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120
S M Heo, H Faulkner, Vvg An, M Symes, H Nandapalan, B Sivakumar
{"title":"Outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs operative fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"S M Heo, H Faulkner, Vvg An, M Symes, H Nandapalan, B Sivakumar","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal humerus fractures are common in the older population. A consensus on the optimal management of complex fractures requiring surgery has yet to be reached. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the literature was undertaken using the Medline<sup>®</sup>, PubMed, Embase™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing clinical and patient reported results as primary outcome measures were included in this review, with secondary outcome measures including complications and revision surgery. A meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 326 patients from 5 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Superior Constant-Murley scores (mean difference [MD]: 13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-20.6; <i>p</i><0.001), Oxford shoulder scores (MD: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.2-7.4; <i>p</i>=0.007), simple shoulder test scores (MD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.01-1.89; <i>p</i>=0.05) and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scores (MD: 5.1 [1 study], 95% CI: 2.1-8.1; <i>p</i>=0.034) were noted in patients receiving RTSA. Range of motion and revision surgery rates were also superior in this group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that RTSA affords more favourable outcomes and lower revision rates than ORIF following proximal humerus fractures. Definitive conclusions are precluded, however, owing to small sample sizes and risk of bias in retrospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"562-568"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A surgeon-modified device for the evacuation of diathermy smoke. 用于排出电疗烟雾的外科医生改良装置。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061
O D Brown, S Aroori
{"title":"A surgeon-modified device for the evacuation of diathermy smoke.","authors":"O D Brown, S Aroori","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 与大容量低复杂性普通外科发病率相关的体重指数临界值:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057
S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh, K Harries, W G Lewis, R J Egan
{"title":"Critical values for body mass index related to morbidity in high-volume low-complexity general surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh, K Harries, W G Lewis, R J Egan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0057","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of body mass index (BMI, kg/m<sup>2</sup>) on outcomes of high-volume low-complexity (HVLC) general surgery procedures and to determine critical values for BMI when selecting patients into HVLC programmes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted of studies looking at patients in different BMI categories undergoing HVLC general surgery procedures (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair and umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair), in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes using random-effects modelling. The QUIPS (Quality In Prognosis Studies) tool and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system were used to assess bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 studies including 486,392 patients were examined. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, BMI ≥40 was associated with higher conversion to open surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, <i>p</i>=0.040) but did not affect complications (OR: 0.69, <i>p</i>=0.400) or length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: -0.01 days, <i>p</i>=0.900). In inguinal hernia repair, BMI ≥35 was associated with longer operative time (MD: 18.00 minutes, <i>p</i><0.00001), and higher risk of wound complications (OR: 3.01, <i>p</i><0.00001) and hospital readmission (OR: 1.46, <i>p</i>=0.0008). In umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair, BMI ≥30 was associated with higher risk of wound complications (OR: 6.45, <i>p</i><0.0001) and hospital readmission (OR: 5.56, <i>p</i><0.00001), and longer operative time (MD: 4.01 minutes, <i>p</i>=0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obesity was associated with longer operative time (up to 23 minutes) and higher risk of postoperative morbidity (up to 4-fold) in HVLC procedures. BMI <40 (moderate GRADE certainty - laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and BMI <35 (moderate GRADE certainty - inguinal hernia) appear to represent optimal critical values for perioperative safety metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141974947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信