Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Innovation and the publishing gambit. 创新和出版赌局。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102
B Rogers
{"title":"Innovation and the publishing gambit.","authors":"B Rogers","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool. 使用修改后的 "确保患者信息质量 "工具对上消化道内窥镜检查的在线患者信息进行质量评估。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078
S Chien, Ghl Miller, I Huang, D A Cunningham, D Carson, L S Gall, K S Khan
{"title":"Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool.","authors":"S Chien, Ghl Miller, I Huang, D A Cunningham, D Carson, L S Gall, K S Khan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Websites and online resources are increasingly becoming patients' main source of healthcare information. It is paramount that high quality information is available online to enhance patient education and improve clinical outcomes. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is the gold standard investigation for UGI symptoms and yet little is known regarding the quality of patient orientated websites. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online patient information on UGI endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten search terms were employed to conduct a systematic review. for each term, the top 100 websites identified via a Google search were assessed using the modified EQIP tool. High scoring websites underwent further analysis. Websites intended for professional use by clinicians as well as those containing video or marketing content were excluded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 378 websites were eligible for analysis. The median modified EQIP score for UGI endoscopy was 18/36 (interquartile range: 14-21). The median EQIP scores for the content, identification and structure domains were 8/18, 1/6 and 9/12 respectively. Higher modified EQIP scores were obtained for websites produced by government departments and National Health Service hospitals (<i>p</i>=0.007). Complication rates were documented in only a fifth (20.4%) of websites. High scoring websites were significantly more likely to provide balanced information on risks and benefits (94.6% vs 34.4%, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an immediate need to improve the quality of online patient information regarding UGI endoscopy. The currently available resources provide minimal information on the risks associated with the procedure, potentially hindering patients' ability to make informed healthcare decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528370/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139904866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proximie in the operating theatre: evaluation of a virtual operating platform for medical student education. 手术室中的 Proximie:医学生教育虚拟手术平台评估。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028
D C Schramm, A Abdul-Hamid, J Ramsden, R Mathew
{"title":"Proximie in the operating theatre: evaluation of a virtual operating platform for medical student education.","authors":"D C Schramm, A Abdul-Hamid, J Ramsden, R Mathew","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students often hesitate to enter the operating theatre because of poor visibility of the surgical field and anxiety about the theatre environment. In addition, ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery is underrepresented in many medical curricula. Virtual systems like Proximie offer flexible viewing of surgeries with surgeon commentary, potentially addressing these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive survey study aimed to evaluate the use of Proximie as a surgical education tool for delivering ENT teaching to medical students. Live ENT procedures were recorded at the ENT Department of the John Radcliffe Hospital and shared with interested clinical medical students through Proximie accounts. Students were added to a private group chat to ask questions and provided feedback through structured forms, assessing procedural effectiveness and the platform's technology. Live-streaming and recording of procedures were facilitated by ENT surgeons providing commentary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conducted over four virtual theatre days, the study gathered 52 responses: 96% of students rated Proximie's educational value as 4 of 5 or higher; 57% preferred the virtual experience over physical attendance because of its convenience and the improved view of the surgical field. Students valued the live commentary and showed interest in using Proximie for a broader range of surgeries. Suggested improvements included fixing technical issues, better communication of theatre lists, and expanding surgical specialty coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proximie has been highly rated by medical students for its effective and engaging approach in the instruction of surgical skills, underscoring its value as an educational tool. Future research is needed to formally assess knowledge acquisition and retention across multiple surgical subspecialties. This work is the first step towards evaluating the utility of virtual operating theatre platforms for medical student education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Debate on: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a surgical care practitioner: a review of outcomes by Odogwu et al. 辩论:Odogwu等人撰写的《由外科护理人员实施的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:疗效综述》。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103
{"title":"Debate on: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a surgical care practitioner: a review of outcomes by Odogwu <i>et al</i>.","authors":"","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing and classic open approach for inguinal hernia repair in children. 腹腔镜经皮内环缝合术与传统开腹法儿童腹股沟疝修补术的长期疗效比较。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0058
S Kılıç
{"title":"Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing and classic open approach for inguinal hernia repair in children.","authors":"S Kılıç","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0058","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries in children. Recently, the use of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair has increased in children. Laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) is a technique described for paediatric inguinal hernia repair. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and reliability of PIRS in paediatric patients through a comparative analysis with an open method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2017 and June 2023, records of patients who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia were retrospectively reviewed. In total 126 patients were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: 33 patients underwent PIRS (group 1) and 93 patients underwent open repair (group 2). Operation time, cost and complications were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the 126 patients was 3.23 ± 2.4 years. The mean unilateral operative time was 25.13 ± 5.32min in group 1 and 30.28 ± 4.73min in group 2, and there was a statistically significant difference in operative time (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Two patients in group 1 underwent surgery owing to patent processus vaginalis, whereas three patients in group 2 underwent surgery owing to metachronous hernia. There were no major complications such as bleeding requiring surgical intervention or conversion to an open approach during surgery in group 1. No recurrent hernia was observed in any of the 126 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIRS offers a safe, easy-to-learn method with low complication rates. PIRS has a distinct advantage over open surgical repair because of its capacity to evaluate the contralateral inguinal ring.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141756731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy on lower oesophageal sphincter physiology. 内窥镜激光环咽肌切开术对下食道括约肌生理学的影响。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-23 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0119
S Perring, Sar Nouraei
{"title":"Impact of endoscopic laser cricopharyngeal myotomy on lower oesophageal sphincter physiology.","authors":"S Perring, Sar Nouraei","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0119","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dysphagia is a watershed symptom that localises poorly. Dividing causes of dysphagia into oropharyngeal and oesophageal does not always best serve the patient. We report the case of a patient whose diagnosis and treatment required three separate specialist referrals to two specialties, with 18 months passing between initial referral and definitive treatment. The predominant pathology was isolated upper oesophageal sphincter dysfunction that responded well to laser cricopharyngeal myotomy. Following surgery, patient symptoms resolved and lost weight was regained. High-resolution manometry showed that the upper sphincter resting pressure had fallen from 117±45 to 21±11mmHg, but the lower sphincter resting pressure had risen, albeit without symptoms, from 16±8 to 44±17mmHg (<i>p<</i>0.001 in both cases). Surgery on upper oesophageal sphincter in the presence of lower oesophageal sphincter incompetence is known to lead to intractable regurgitation and pneumonia, and this novel physiological observation further emphasises the need to holistically consider the patient and to systematically evaluate the entire swallowing system before undertaking invasive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9113049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure dressing in the management of Fournier's gangrene. 使用真空辅助闭合敷料治疗 Fournier 坏疽的新方法。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0102
L Condell, N Doolan, M McMonagle
{"title":"The novel use of a vacuum-assisted closure dressing in the management of Fournier's gangrene.","authors":"L Condell, N Doolan, M McMonagle","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0102","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0102","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528352/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new setup for single surgeon paediatric supracondylar fracture pinning. 用于单外科医生儿科肱骨髁上骨折固定的新装置。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0018
K Dogramatzis, M Imam, A Cameron-Smith
{"title":"A new setup for single surgeon paediatric supracondylar fracture pinning.","authors":"K Dogramatzis, M Imam, A Cameron-Smith","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0018","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528365/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139970811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. 机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病:随机对照试验的系统综述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0038
A Thrikandiyur, G Kourounis, S Tingle, P Thambi
{"title":"Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"A Thrikandiyur, G Kourounis, S Tingle, P Thambi","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0038","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic surgery (RS) is gaining prominence in colorectal procedures owing to advantages like three-dimensional vision and enhanced dexterity, particularly in rectal surgery. Although recent reviews report similar outcomes between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and RS, this study investigates the evolving trends in outcomes over time, paralleling the increasing experience in RS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted of randomised controlled trials exploring postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing RS or LS for colorectal pathology. The primary outcome measure was postoperative complications. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's assessment tool. Randomised controlled trials were identified from the PubMed<sup>®</sup>, Embase<sup>®</sup> and CINAHL<sup>®</sup> (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases via the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 491 articles screened, 13 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of postoperative complications revealed no significant difference between RS and LS (relative risk [RR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79 to 1.18, <i>p</i>=0.72). Meta-regression analysis of postoperative complications demonstrated a significant trend favouring RS over time (yearly change in Ln(RR): -0.0620, 95% CI: -0.1057 to -0.0183, <i>p</i>=0.005). Secondary outcome measures included operative time, length of stay, blood loss, conversion to open surgery, positive circumferential resection margins and lymph nodes retrieved. The only significant findings were shorter operative time favouring LS (mean difference: 41.48 minutes, 95% CI: 22.15 to 60.81 minutes, <i>p</i><0.001) and fewer conversions favouring RS (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.85, <i>p</i>=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As experience in RS grows, evidence suggests an increasing safety profile for patients. Meta-regression revealed a significant temporal trend with complication rates favouring RS over LS. Heterogeneous reporting of complications hindered subgroup analysis of minor and major complications. LS remains quicker. Rising adoption of RS coupled with emerging evidence is expected to further elucidate its clinical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opinion, uptake and current practice of robot-assisted upper gastrointestinal and oesophagogastric surgery in the UK: AUGIS national survey results. 英国对机器人辅助上消化道和食道胃手术的看法、接受程度和当前实践:AUGIS全国调查结果。
IF 1.1 4区 医学
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-06 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0013
P May-Miller, S R Markar, N Blencowe, J A Gossage, A Botros, P H Pucher
{"title":"Opinion, uptake and current practice of robot-assisted upper gastrointestinal and oesophagogastric surgery in the UK: AUGIS national survey results.","authors":"P May-Miller, S R Markar, N Blencowe, J A Gossage, A Botros, P H Pucher","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0013","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The uptake of upper gastrointestinal (GI) robotic surgery in the United Kingdom (UK), and Europe more widely, is expanding rapidly. This study aims to present a current snapshot of the practice and opinions of the upper GI community with reference to robotic surgery, with an emphasis on tertiary cancer (oesophagogastric) resection centres.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was circulated to the UK upper GI surgical community via national mailing lists, social media and at an open-invitation conference on robotic upper GI surgery in January 2023. The survey included questions on surgeons' current practice or planned adoption (if any) of robotics at individual and unit level, and their opinions on robotic upper GI surgery in general. Priority ranking and Likert-scale response options were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 81 respondents from 43 hospitals were included. Thirty-four resectional centres responded, including 30 of 31 (97%) recognised upper GI cancer centres in England. Respondents reported performing robotic surgery in 21 of 34 (61.8%) resectional centres, with a median of 65 procedures per centre performed at the time of the survey (range 0-500, interquartile range 93.75). Every centre without a robotic programme expressed a desire or had active plans to implement one. Respondents ranked surgeon ergonomics as the most important reason for pursuing robotics, followed by improvements in patient outcomes and oncological efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic upper GI practice is nascent but rapidly growing in the UK with plans for uptake in almost all tertiary centres. There is growing opinion that this is likely to become the predominant surgical approach in future with benefits to both patients and surgeons. This snapshot offers a point of reference to all stakeholders in upper GI surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528355/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140038615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信