Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
O Edginton, M George, C Bandara, M Johnston, A Rao, M Howse, D Ridgway, P Goldsmith
{"title":"Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients.","authors":"O Edginton, M George, C Bandara, M Johnston, A Rao, M Howse, D Ridgway, P Goldsmith","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, <i>p</i> = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, <i>p</i> = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, <i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, p = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, p = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, p = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, p = 0.013).

Conclusions: The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.

老年人肾移植:回顾性队列研究,探讨 2019 年新肾脏供应计划对老年人移植受者的影响。
导言:2019 年,英国推出了一项新的肾脏供应计划,旨在更好地匹配预计的患者存活率和移植物预期寿命。该计划对接受肾移植(KT)的老年患者的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较 2019 年计划推出前后老年肾移植受者的治疗效果:对接受 KT 的老年人进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究。第一组在 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 2019 年 8 月 31 日(2006 年分配方案)期间移植,第二组在 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 31 日(2019 年提供方案)期间移植。老年人是指接受 KT 时年龄≥60 岁的人。进行了单变量二元逻辑回归分析,以确定几率比(OR)和 95% 的置信区间(CI):结果:共有 107 名老年已故供体 KT 受者,其中 62 人来自第 1 组,45 人来自第 2 组。移植时的中位年龄分别为 68 岁(四分位距[IQR] 62-71 岁)和 67 岁(四分位距[IQR] 64-73 岁)。单变量分析表明,第 2 组受者再次介入(OR 6.486,95% CI 1.306-32.216,p = 0.022)和入住重症监护室(OR 5.619,95% CI 1.448-21.812,p = 0.013)的可能性明显更高。第2组受者中,人类白细胞抗原(HLA)4级错配(OR 4.667,95% CI 1.640-13.275,p = 0.004)和既往接受过KT(OR 4.691,95% CI 1.385-15.893,p = 0.013)的可能性明显更高:结论:2019 年发售计划的推出与老年 KT 患者的再次干预和重症监护入院有关。我们还观察到,HLA匹配较差,但在难以匹配的群体中,KT数量较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信