Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine最新文献

{"title":"Inter-Semispinalis Plane Block Versus General Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"A. Mahmoud, Mohammed Awad Alsaied, S. Ragab, Youmna Ahmed Abdelfattah, Omer Sayed Farghaly, Mohamed Ahmed Shawky","doi":"10.5812/aapm-143369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-143369","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative pain management is crucial for improving patient outcomes following posterior cervical spine surgery. Opioids are effective but carry a risk of respiratory depression. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used but may not provide adequate pain relief and have potential complications. The inter-semispinalis plane (ISPB) block is a novel technique for postoperative analgesia in cervical spine surgery. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of the ISPB with general anesthesia in terms of analgesia, postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, patient-surgeon satisfaction levels, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial was blinded to both the patient and the assessor. Fifty adult patients (18 - 60 years old) undergoing elective posterior cervical spine surgery were enrolled. The participants were divided into 2 groups: The ISPB group (receiving bilateral ultrasound-guided ISPB at the C5 level) and the control group (receiving general anesthesia only), with each group comprising 25 patients. The study assessed intraoperative fentanyl use, postoperative VAS pain levels, the need for rescue analgesia, and complications. Results: The ISPB group showed significantly lower intraoperative fentanyl consumption (median 100 vs. 100 - 150 μg, P = 0.022) and lower postoperative pain scores at 1, 8, 12, and 48 hours (P = 0.016, 0.009, 0.005, 0.016). Additionally, the ISPB group required less postoperative pethidine (20% vs. 64%, P = 0.002) and had a longer delay before requesting pethidine (hazard ratio 0.215, P = 0.001). Surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the ISPB group (P = 0.003). These results suggest that the ISPB can effectively reduce pain and analgesic requirements. Conclusions: The ISPB is an effective analgesic technique for posterior cervical spine surgery, reducing opioid consumption, providing better pain control, and enhancing surgeon satisfaction without increasing complications. This approach has the potential to improve postoperative care and patient outcomes in this surgical population.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"277 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140454733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block: Effect on the Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery After Off-PUMP Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery","authors":"R. Mahrose, Hany Magdy Fahim, Amr A. Kasem, Mohammed Samy Helmy Sakr, M. A. Menshawi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-144344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-144344","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anteromedial chest wall fascial plane blocks may serve as a valuable addition to postoperative multimodal pain management following median sternotomy for cardiothoracic surgeries. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) in patients scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery. Methods: This randomized controlled study involved 40 adult patients aged 30 to 70 years undergoing OPCAB surgery. They were randomly assigned to two equal groups: Group PI received bilateral ultrasound (US)-guided PIFB with 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 2.5 µg/mL, while group C (control group) received bilateral sham blocks with 20 mL of saline 0.9%. Pain scores in the postoperative period (primary outcome), perioperative analgesic consumption, time until extubation, and discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) were assessed for both groups. Results: Postoperative pain scores, both at rest and during coughing, were significantly lower in group PI compared to group C. Group PI required significantly less fentanyl perioperatively and less tramadol for postoperative rescue compared to group C. The duration of postoperative ventilation and time to ICU discharge were significantly shorter in group PI than in group C. Conclusions: In patients undergoing OPCAB surgery, pre-incisional ultrasound-guided PIFB can be a beneficial and safe component of multimodal pain management. It provides improved postoperative pain control, reduces the need for perioperative opioids, and leads to faster extubation and ICU discharge.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139963305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Expression of Concern for \"Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial\" [Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592].","authors":"Mahmood-Reza Alebouyeh","doi":"10.5812/aapm-144495","DOIUrl":"10.5812/aapm-144495","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"e144495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078233/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141199210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efficacy Comparison Between Interscalene Block with and Without Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Anesthesia in Clavicle Surgery","authors":"F. Mosaffa, M. Ghasemi, Afsaneh Habibi, R. Minaei, Narges Bazgir, Elham Memary, Alireza Shakeri","doi":"10.5812/aapm-142051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142051","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clavicle fractures account for over one-third of shoulder injuries and up to 3.3% of all fractures in adults. While the majority of these fractures can be managed non-surgically, there are instances where surgical intervention is performed. Regional anesthesia (RA) can be a preferred alternative to general anesthesia (GA) to avoid complications and high costs in this surgery. Moreover, the identification of the most optimal approach for RA remains challenging. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of interscalene block (ISB) with and without superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as an anesthetic technique for clavicular fracture operation. Methods: This double-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted on 120 patients randomly divided into 2 groups: one receiving ISB and the other receiving ISB with SCPB. The primary outcome was defined as the conversion to GA. Various factors were recorded, including surgery duration, nerve block initiation, analgesics required in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and sedation during surgery. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in PACU. SPSS version 26 was used for statistical analysis, performing descriptive analysis, Student’s T-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests to compare non-parametric variables between the 2 groups. Statistically significant results had a P value of less than 0.05. Results: A total of 120 patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups, each consisting of 50 males and 10 females. The mean age of intervention and case groups were 37.23 ± 13.30 and 38.43 ± 11.95 years, respectively. After performing statistical tests (Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test), there was no significant difference in the initiation time of nerve block, surgery initiation time, surgery duration, the amount of required sedation, VAS scores, and meperidine consumption (P > 0.05). None of the patients in both groups required conversion to GA. Conclusions: The primary goal was achieved in all included cases, and no patients required conversion to GA. The efficacy of ISB is the same whether or not it is combined with a SCPB. Interscalene block is an alternative RA approach for clavicle fractures. Thus, ISB alone is as efficient as when used in combination with SCPB.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140502253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Continuous Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Decreases Hospital Length of Stay Compared to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia After Open Radical Cystectomy Surgery: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Sanaz Beig Zali, Rachel Steinhorn, Vivian Hu, Linda Hung, Francis McGovern, Farbod Alinezhad, Tammer Yamany, Thomas Anthony Anderson, A. Sabouri","doi":"10.5812/aapm-143354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-143354","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Poorly managed postoperative pain can prolong hospital stays and increase the risk of complications in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC). Despite strong support from the clinical guidelines for using surgical site-specific peripheral regional anesthetic techniques and neuraxial analgesia, their effects on postoperative outcomes are unclear. Objectives: This study aims to fill the above knowledge gap by comparing thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and continuous transversus abdominis plane (CTAP) blocks in ORC patients. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we conducted chart reviews at a quaternary care academic hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, between March 2015 and September 2017. Patients undergoing ORC and receiving either CTAP or TEA were included. The primary outcome was the hospital length of stay (HLOS), and secondary outcomes included time until ambulation, postoperative narcotic usage, and renal function as measured by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results: We studied 146 patients, 124 of whom met our inclusion criteria. Patients receiving CTAP had a 17.4% reduction in HLOS (95% CI: 3.2, 29.4; P = 0.02) and a 13.9% reduction in time until ambulation (95% CI: 3.4, 23.3; P = 0.01) compared to those receiving TEA. This was equivalent to a relative decrease in HLOS of approximately 2.1 days in the CTAP group as compared to the TEA group. No significant differences were observed in narcotic usage or GFR between the two groups. Our sensitivity analyses using instrumental variables analysis yielded similar results. Conclusions: Continuous transversus abdominis plane was associated with a shorter HLOS and quicker time to ambulate compared to TEA, without affecting narcotic usage or renal function. These findings suggest that CTAP may be a viable alternative to TEA for perioperative analgesia in ORC patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140505298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analgesic Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III and Type II Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial","authors":"Hesham Elsayed Elashry, Mohamed Abdelbadie, Abeer Ali Elshabacy, Omnia Ali Elmiseery","doi":"10.5812/aapm-140464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-140464","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Appropriate pain management promotes immediate mobilization and allows the parturient to adequately care for her neonate after cesarean section (CS). Objectives: This trial objective was to compare the type III and type II quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) regarding postoperative analgesic effect in CS. Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial involved 60 women presenting for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were assigned randomly to either the QLB type III, QLB type II, or lateral TAPB group. All blocks were performed using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally at the end of the operation with ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The level of patient satisfaction was graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Numerical rating scale measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours and total consumed meperidine in the 1st 24 hours after the operation were reduced significantly in QLB III than in QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05) with an insignificant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). The onset of the first request for analgesia was delayed significantly in QLB III, compared to QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05), without a significant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction and adverse events (e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension) exhibited insignificant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The QLB type III ensured better analgesia as evidenced by significantly lower pain measurements and amount of meperidine in the first 24 hours after the operation with delayed time of the first rescue analgesia in comparison to QLB II and TAPB; however, QLB II and TAPB were similar.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"105 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140505018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Relationship Between Airway Examination with LEMON Criteria and Difficulty of Tracheal Intubation with IDS Criteria","authors":"Pooya Derakhshan, N. Nikoubakht, M. Alimian, Sadaf Mohammadi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-142921","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142921","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tracheal intubation is a common technique used to secure a patient’s airway, which is crucial in anesthesia. Successful tracheal intubation depends on various factors, including the assessment of the patient’s airway before the procedure. In recent years, scoring systems, such as LEMON (an acronym for the assessment of the airway’s appearance, identification of any dental issues, evaluation of Mallampati classification, assessment of airway obstruction, and examination of neck mobility) and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) have gained attention. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the LEMON criteria and IDS in tracheal intubation. The goal was to provide valuable insights that can assist medical professionals in optimizing their approach to airway management by analyzing clinical data, assessing patient outcomes, and evaluating the consistency between these scoring systems. Methods: This study was based on a descriptive-analytical study involving a group of patients requiring intubation. This study examined 105 patients scheduled for elective surgeries, aged between 19 and 60 years, without specific underlying diseases, such as laryngeal cancer, temporomandibular joint stiffness, or significant tongue enlargement, and with a body mass index (BMI) below 40 kg/m². Initially, expert anesthesiologists assessed the patients using the LEMON criteria, and then the degree of intubation difficulty was measured using the IDS scoring system. Finally, these two criteria were compared. Results: In this study, there was a significant correlation between the LEMON score and the IDS score (P < 0.001). The difficult intubation group (IDS score higher than 0) had higher LEMON scores (with the highest score equal to 4) than the non-difficult intubation group (IDS score of 0) (P = 0.017). The average LEMON and IDS scores were 3.11 and 1.35, respectively. Among the participants, 96.2% had an intubation difficulty score of ≤ 5; nevertheless, 3.8% had a score of > 5. Additionally, limited neck mobility emerged as the sole independent predictor of intubation difficulty (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 6.152). Conclusions: The LEMON score is associated with difficult intubation in adult patients requiring intubation.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140505841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Combined Segmental Thoracic Spinal Epidural Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgeries and Laparoscopic Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study","authors":"Alaa Ali M. Elzohry, A. S. Hegab, Osama Yehia A. Khalifa, Khadeja M. Elhossieny, F. A. Z. H. Abdel Hameed","doi":"10.5812/aapm-138825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138825","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia (SA) may be a good alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures, especially in high-risk patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of thoracic segmental SA vs GA during abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures. Methods: This study was conducted at our university hospital and involved a total of 46 patients who underwent abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures. The study period spanned from January 15, 2022, to October 15, 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (n = 23) received standard GA, and group 2 (n = 23) received thoracic segmental SA. A combination of 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 25 μg of fentanyl was injected through the spinal needle. The epidural catheter was then threaded through the Tuohy needle after withdrawal of the spinal needle to keep only 4 cm up in the epidural space. Demographic data, both intra and postoperative hemodynamic parameters, were monitored. Postoperatively, pain in both groups was treated with intravenous (IV) morphine by patient controlled analgesia (PCA), PCA settings were 1 mg morphine/mL, no background infusion, bolus dose 2 mL and lockout interval 15 min. Postoperative, both resting VAS and VAS during cough were measured for all patients at fixed intervals, and all patients were followed up for postoperative complications. Results: No significant variation was found in demographic data. Intra and postoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measurements were higher in group 1 than in group 2 but without a statistically significant difference (P < 0.029). Early postoperative VAS values and discharge time from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were significantly reduced in group 2 than in group 1 (P < 0.001). The number of patients asked for analgesia and total opioid consumption were substantially reduced in group 2 than in group 1. Also, the time of the first analgesia request and patient satisfaction were substantially greater in group 2 than in group 1. Conclusions: Combined thoracic spinal/epidural block results in stable hemodynamics, longer postoperative analgesia with fewer side effects, and greater surgeon and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing abdominal operations and laparoscopic procedures.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"45 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140508981","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intrathecal Injection of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus a Mixture of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Lower Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Adel Ali Hassan, Amira Seleem Saleh, Maged Salah Mohamed, M. S. Khalil","doi":"10.5812/aapm-142719","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142719","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bupivacaine hydrochloride is widely used as the primary drug for spinal anesthesia. Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the intrathecal administration of both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) in lower abdominal surgery. Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial was conducted on 50 patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to II, scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. The patients were allocated randomly into two groups of similar size. Group A (control group) received 20 mg HB 0.5% intrathecally. Group B (case group) received 10 mg HB 0.5% and 10 mg isobaric bupivacaine (IB) 0.5%. Results: There was a significant decline in heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group A compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Group A had a significantly greater sensory level at 10 and 20 minutes than Group B (P = 0.008 and 0.006, respectively). Group A had an earlier duration in reaching Bromage 3 and the first need for analgesia, compared to group B (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Conclusions: In lower abdominal surgery, the intrathecal administration of HB with IB increased hemodynamic stability and duration of both sensory and motor blockade but with slower recovery from anesthesia compared to HB alone.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"52 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139451919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effect of Intravenous Injection of Magnesium Sulphate on Intraoperative End-Tidal CO2 Level and Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy","authors":"Mahboobeh Akhondi, Ali Sarkoohi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-135189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-135189","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pain control and stabilizing hemodynamic indices are serious medical challenges, especially in anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery is increasing in the world, and cholecystectomy surgery is no exception. Objectives: This study investigated the effect of intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate injection on intraoperative end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) levels and postoperative pain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: This is a clinical trial. The sample size was calculated to be 64 people who were selected among the patients who were candidates for laparoscopic surgery by convenience sampling. They were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received magnesium sulfate (50 mg/kg) and normal saline (100 mL) within 1 h. The control group only received normal saline (100 mL). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, ETCO2 level, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, pain level, and narcotic analgesics in recovery were measured 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. The data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures analysis. Results: The mean of systolic blood pressure and ETCO2 during recovery in the intervention group were less than the control group (P = 0.029 and P = 0.015). In the intervention group, analgesic consumption in recovery and 6 h after surgery was less than the control group (P < 0.001). The mean pain score in the intervention group in recovery and 2, 6 (P < 0.001), and 12 h (P = 0.038) after surgery was significantly lower than the control group. Conclusions: Magnesium sulfate can be a suitable and safe supplement to reduce pain after surgery and reduce the use of narcotics. The current conclusion should be investigated on a larger scale of patients, with extended monitoring for postoperative pain over a longer period of time.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"75 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139132102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}