Anesthetic Management Recommendations Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgeries

Q2 Medicine
A. A. Abin, Ahmad Molla, Azar Ejmalian, Shahabedin Nabavi, Behnaz Memari, Kamal Fani, Ali Dabbagh
{"title":"Anesthetic Management Recommendations Using a Machine Learning Algorithm to Reduce the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgeries","authors":"A. A. Abin, Ahmad Molla, Azar Ejmalian, Shahabedin Nabavi, Behnaz Memari, Kamal Fani, Ali Dabbagh","doi":"10.5812/aapm-143853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Open heart surgeries are a common surgical approach among patients with heart disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following cardiac surgeries, with an average incidence of 6 - 10%. Additionally, AKI has a mortality rate of 5 - 10%. One of the challenges of cardiac surgeries is selecting the appropriate anesthetic approaches to reduce the risk of AKI. Objectives: This study presents a machine learning-based method that consists of two regression models. These models can inform the anesthesiologist about the risk of AKI resulting from the improper selection of anesthetic parameters. Methods: In this cohort study, the medical records of 998 patients who underwent cardiac surgery were collected. The proposed method includes two regression models. The first regression model recommends optimal anesthesia parameters to minimize the risk of AKI. The second model provides the anesthesiologist with the safest margin for deciding on anesthetic parameters during surgery, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, anesthesia time, crystalloid dose, diuretic dose, and transfusion of packed red cells (PC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Using this method, the specialist can evaluate the anesthetic parameters and assess the potential AKI risk. Additionally, the proposed method can also provide the treatment team with anesthetic parameters that carry the lowest risk of AKI. Results: This method was evaluated using data from 526 patients who suffered from postoperative AKI (AKI+) and 472 who did not suffer any injury (AKI-). The accuracy of the proposed method is 80.6%. Additionally, the evaluation of the proposed method by three experienced cardiac anesthesiologists shows a high correlation between the results of the proposed method and the opinions of the anesthesiologists. Conclusions: The results indicated that the outputs of the proposed models and the designed software could help reduce the risk of postoperative AKI.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-143853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open heart surgeries are a common surgical approach among patients with heart disease. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common postoperative complications following cardiac surgeries, with an average incidence of 6 - 10%. Additionally, AKI has a mortality rate of 5 - 10%. One of the challenges of cardiac surgeries is selecting the appropriate anesthetic approaches to reduce the risk of AKI. Objectives: This study presents a machine learning-based method that consists of two regression models. These models can inform the anesthesiologist about the risk of AKI resulting from the improper selection of anesthetic parameters. Methods: In this cohort study, the medical records of 998 patients who underwent cardiac surgery were collected. The proposed method includes two regression models. The first regression model recommends optimal anesthesia parameters to minimize the risk of AKI. The second model provides the anesthesiologist with the safest margin for deciding on anesthetic parameters during surgery, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, anesthesia time, crystalloid dose, diuretic dose, and transfusion of packed red cells (PC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Using this method, the specialist can evaluate the anesthetic parameters and assess the potential AKI risk. Additionally, the proposed method can also provide the treatment team with anesthetic parameters that carry the lowest risk of AKI. Results: This method was evaluated using data from 526 patients who suffered from postoperative AKI (AKI+) and 472 who did not suffer any injury (AKI-). The accuracy of the proposed method is 80.6%. Additionally, the evaluation of the proposed method by three experienced cardiac anesthesiologists shows a high correlation between the results of the proposed method and the opinions of the anesthesiologists. Conclusions: The results indicated that the outputs of the proposed models and the designed software could help reduce the risk of postoperative AKI.
利用机器学习算法提出麻醉管理建议,降低心脏手术后急性肾损伤的风险
背景:在心脏病患者中,开胸手术是一种常见的手术方式。急性肾损伤(AKI)是心脏手术后最常见的术后并发症之一,平均发生率为 6 - 10%。此外,急性肾损伤的死亡率为 5 - 10%。心脏手术的挑战之一是选择适当的麻醉方法以降低 AKI 风险。研究目的本研究提出了一种基于机器学习的方法,该方法由两个回归模型组成。这些模型可让麻醉师了解因麻醉参数选择不当而导致的 AKI 风险。方法:在这项队列研究中,收集了 998 名心脏手术患者的医疗记录。提出的方法包括两个回归模型。第一个回归模型推荐最佳麻醉参数,以最大限度地降低 AKI 风险。第二个模型为麻醉师提供了决定手术期间麻醉参数的最安全范围,包括心肺旁路(CPB)时间、麻醉时间、晶体液剂量、利尿剂剂量以及包装红细胞(PC)和新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)的输注。使用这种方法,专家可以评估麻醉参数,并评估潜在的 AKI 风险。此外,建议的方法还能为治疗团队提供发生 AKI 风险最低的麻醉参数。结果:使用 526 名术后发生 AKI 的患者(AKI+)和 472 名未发生任何损伤的患者(AKI-)的数据对该方法进行了评估。建议方法的准确率为 80.6%。此外,三位经验丰富的心脏麻醉专家对所提方法进行的评估显示,所提方法的结果与麻醉专家的意见高度相关。结论:结果表明,所提模型和设计软件的输出结果有助于降低术后 AKI 的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信