{"title":"Legibility and Agency","authors":"N. J. Enfield","doi":"10.1111/aman.70041","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper argues that legibility is foundational to human agency. The argument critiques the implication that legibility is exclusively modern or necessarily disempowering. On the contrary, legibility is necessary for the existence of any sociocultural system and for the agency of its members. Using examples from fieldwork in upland Laos and beyond, we define legibility as a relation between agents and environments, both physical and social in kind. First-order legibility, whereby agents tune their interpretation and action to environments, is distinguished from second-order legibility, whereby environments are manipulated to guide other agents’ interpretations and actions. The paper explores diverse relations between legibility and agency, covering social deviance, high modernist state control regimes, semiotic interception, preference capture, and preference installation. These phenomena illustrate the mechanisms whereby individual agency may be both enabled and constrained by legibility regimes. The concluding discussion evaluates the relation between legibility and agency in light of social inequalities and imbalances of power. It is found that legibility presents both risks and opportunities for human agency in all social and cultural contexts and at all scales.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146154971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tasting Red, Hearing Silk: Synesthesia, Sensory Labor, and the Social Aesthetics of Chefs","authors":"Kelly Alexander","doi":"10.1111/aman.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article examines synesthesia as a mode of perception by exploring its implications for culinary labor, specifically how chefs navigate multisensory experience in the high-pressure environment of professional kitchens. Drawing on 30 years of fieldwork and observations of, and interviews with, more than 500 chefs, it brings sensory anthropology, food studies, and the everyday practices of professional cooking into conversation to explore how heightened sensory attunements both shape and are shaped by creativity and environmental culture. While neurological studies often frame synesthesia as a rare or idiosyncratic condition, this article foregrounds its broader social and cultural dimensions, positioning it within the social aesthetics of kitchen labor. Building on the work of Classen, Howes, Sutton, and others, it examines how chefs’ perceptions—whether clinically diagnosed as synesthetic or not—fuse taste, texture, sound, and memory. The article argues that culinary labor reveals the entanglements of sensory experience, cultural value, and embodied knowledge, showing how food functions as both material and metaphor, and how the senses themselves are informed by work. This ethnographic account invites readers to consider the kitchen as a site where the senses operate in concert, linking inner perception to outer worlds.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"52-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146154743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Wheels Turning: Anthropological Solidarity, Engaged Buddhism, and a Return to the 1990s","authors":"Michael Edwards","doi":"10.1111/aman.70045","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In the conventional histories of anthropology that we tend to tell, certain decades loom large: the 1920s, for example, or the 1980s. This article experiments with a comparative reading of a decade closer to our fraught present: the 1990s. With an eye to the discipline's current impasses, and with the benefit of some three decades' distance, I join others in beginning to historicize ’90s sociocultural anthropology, tracking its turns amid the cultural moods and political conditions of that moment. I do so by rereading this history obliquely, alongside the history of an adjacent intellectual and social formation, that of engaged Buddhism. Considering how anthropologists and engaged Buddhists grappled, through the 1990s, with a set of related questions—about interdependence, suffering, and engagement—reveals ethical ambitions and political shortcomings that continue to shape pressing debates in both fields today, not least about the promises and practices of solidarity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146154967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Borderland Anxiety: Negotiating Care Ethics at a Transcultural Clinic","authors":"Stéphanie Larchanché","doi":"10.1111/aman.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article explores the borderland as a site of anxiety. I define borderland as a stretch of space (physical and symbolic) or as a subjective positioning where defined border categories are suspended or renegotiated. Anxiety here is an ethical affect that results from being located in a semantically overdetermined location, where individuals are faced with various scripts to choose from, each of which introduces legitimate, ethical arguments. I engage with the institutional management of asylum seekers’ mental health distress as a site of anxiety in the context of contemporary France. From the analysis of an event that disrupts the routine of various institutional actors in social services and public health, I attempt to trace how social anxieties arise and how they are reframed by a specific community of practice: transcultural clinicians at Centre Minkowska in Paris. Centre Minkowska, while itself positioned at the borderland, offers a space where anxiety as an affect can be expressed and legitimately participate in the logics of professional deliberation. By doing so, it offers professionals a safe space to critically reflect on appropriate clinical responses to potentially stigmatizing referrals.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A (Linguistic) Anthropology of Ambivalence: Exploring Discourses of Serbian Pasts, Presents, and Futures","authors":"Rachel George","doi":"10.1111/aman.70053","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ambivalence is a crucial framework for understanding the lived realities of ethnographic research participants in a wide variety of sociopolitical contexts. Using research at a high school in Belgrade, Serbia, as a case study, this paper proposes a linguistic anthropology of ambivalence. Drawing and expanding upon recent discussions of ambivalence in anthropology, the paper analyzes multiple types of ambivalent discourse, considers common themes across such discourses, and suggests some implications of centering ambivalence for core linguistic anthropological concepts.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"206-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“Everything Is Just Done Away With Now”: Contentious Practices of Scalar Brokerage Motivated by Narratives of Welfare Nostalgia in Postcolonial Rotterdam","authors":"Lieke van der Veer","doi":"10.1111/aman.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to anthropological theories of brokerage, brokers build bridges, close gaps, make connections, and construct shared norms. In this article, I argue that such structural-functionalist approaches to brokerage do not prove adequate in addressing unsettled and unsettling scale-making practices of refugee-led support initiatives in postcolonial Europe. Refugee advocates of long-term Dutch heritage evoke narratives of nostalgia for a long-lost welfare state to motivate their commitment to social justice and for the inclusion of refugee-led initiatives. However, this article demonstrates that the alleged universality of social security in the postwar caring state is a myth and that fantasies of down-scaled local action cohere with uneasy postcolonial formations. These formations surface in everyday interactions between advocates and organizers with a forced-migration background. Organizers need the support of advocates in dealing with experiences of intersectional racism, but their dependent relationship with advocates is not devoid of power asymmetries either. Inequalities in these relationships culminate in negotiations over scale: whereas advocates are committed to downscaling refugee-led initiatives and weaving together local networks of sociality, organizers seek to upscale their initiative beyond the neighborhood and pursue social mobility. These controversies over scale echo social injustices that are bound up with postwar repair and decolonization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"108-119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How to Fish With Respect: A Transformation of Human-Fish Relations in Riverside Amazonia","authors":"Vinicius de Aguiar Furuie","doi":"10.1111/aman.70044","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Riverside inhabitants of the Middle Xingu River Basin, in the Brazilian Amazonia, frequently say that it is important to respect animals and the forest spirits who protect them. In recent decades, however, the development of an iced fish industry in the region has changed what respect means and how it is expressed when it comes to fishing. This article analyzes shifting attitudes toward fish by focusing on the transformation of the notion of <i>panema</i>, a word that denotes an acquired state in which one becomes incapable of hunting and fishing. I argue that the commodification of fresh fish has not altered the animistic principle that fish are imbued with an interior state of mind and other markers of personhood. Commodification, however, has decreased the importance of spirit owners and increased the importance of the mental state of the fishers in their accounts of their activities. I pose that such transformation can only be properly accounted for by breaking down the analytical distinction between political economy and ontology and focusing on how the riverside inhabitants see it as a normative issue, measured in regard to respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"63-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Spirits, Land, and Bones: The Social Ecology of Forensic Intervention","authors":"Jaymelee J. Kim, Tricia Redeker Hepner","doi":"10.1111/aman.70050","DOIUrl":"10.1111/aman.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In northern Uganda, the living and the dead remain bound together through land, spirits, and the slow labor of repair. Yet forensic science, when deployed in postconflict settings, often treats bodies as evidence and landscapes as backdrops, severing these ties in the name of science or justice. This article applies a socioecological lens to an “integrated approach” to forensic intervention that begins instead with Acholi understandings of personhood and place, in which spirits, animals, and soil are participants in social life. Based on years of collaborative ethnographic fieldwork—including interviews, community dialogues, and mapping of sites of hauntings and burials—the study shows how Acholi cosmologies unsettle the epistemic foundations of forensic practice. When the dead disturb the living, the problem is not only spiritual but ecological, demanding rebalancing among humans, nonhumans, and the land itself. We argue that forensic anthropology can become an act of listening rather than extraction—one that attends to the agencies of sites, spirits, and survivors alike. Reframing the work in this way reveals both the limits and the possibilities of forensic intervention, offering a vision of justice rooted not in recovery alone but in renewed relations among the living and the dead.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"128 1","pages":"97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146154968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}