Juliana Jäggle, Tim Schmid, Magdalena Tanner, Gernot Bodner, Katharina Keiblinger, Bernhard Scharf, Sophie van Geijtenbeek, Olivier Ejderyan
{"title":"Humusaufbau within German-speaking regenerative farming communities in Switzerland and Austria","authors":"Juliana Jäggle, Tim Schmid, Magdalena Tanner, Gernot Bodner, Katharina Keiblinger, Bernhard Scharf, Sophie van Geijtenbeek, Olivier Ejderyan","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10947-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10947-w","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper contextualises regenerative agriculture (RA) in Switzerland and Austria through qualitative interviews with farmers in order to explore how <i>Humusaufbau</i> (soil organic matter increase) acts as a boundary object, unifying diverse discourses and practices. We show that in this context, RA by centring on <i>Humusaufbau</i> actively addresses the challenges posed by the climate crisis to agriculture while simultaneously providing farmers with accessible solutions that enhance their sense of self-efficacy. The farmers interviewed articulate strong expectations of <i>Humusaufbau</i> regarding climate adaptation and mitigation potentials at the farm level. Regenerative farmers individually combine practices out of a larger set of regenerative farming practices (RFPs), with the goal of facilitating <i>Humusaufbau</i>. Many of these RFPs stem from other sustainable farming approaches. RA thereby challenges prior existing distinctions between established sustainable farming approaches through the selective recombination of their practices. Our analysis identifies three distinct discourses farmers use to justify RFPs: organic, technical, and alternative RA. These discourses converge around <i>Humusaufbau</i> from different approaches, bridging organic and conventional farmers. We find that the direct transformative potential of RA in Switzerland and Austria is constrained across all three discourses by a focus on farm-level solutions, with limited engagement with broader social or systemic change. However, the unifying dimension of <i>Humusaufbau</i> and the role it plays in integrating organic and non-organic farmers in a community offering an alternative discourse to mainstream conventional farming, might lay the ground for future transformation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10947-w.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148751655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Translating care in defensive times: We are not here to take over; we are here to take care","authors":"Kirsten Valentine Cadieux","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10860-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10860-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In times of tumultuous contest over the value of agriculture and food systems, care and repair in bureaucratic evaluation processes are particularly important. Infrastructure to support repair and care can be built and maintained to respond substantively to what has been injurious for people in their interactions with agriculture and food systems. Sharing stories for the purpose of evaluating agri-food maintenance and improvement projects can nourish agriculture and food systems, and can demonstrate the role of care and repair in nourishing agri-food systems. Two brief case stories about how people evaluate and negotiate values show how explicit attention to power dynamics, especially around the terms by which success is determined – for example, beyond a reductive focus on crop yields, and with attention to dynamics of dispossession and disenfranchisement in agriculture. They also show how relationally negotiated evaluation practices can help us understand agri-food issues with rigor and across potentially conflicting perspectives. This use of participatory evaluation frameworks in practical narration can help keep what’s meaningful included in the conversation, and in the actions and infrastructure we support to maintain and improve food systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148751935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Farming, race, and repair in the United States","authors":"Stephen Carpenter","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10939-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10939-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148751654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Celebrations of the nourishing and reconciling methods of Brother Melvin Giles, Elder Peace, as shared by the community organizations he loved and mentored","authors":"Kirsten Valentine Cadieux","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10929-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10929-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148751656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anuradha Alahakoon, Bertram Jenkins, Rhiannon Smith, Nick Reid
{"title":"The permaculture movement and the global south: towards a democratised agroecological knowledge project","authors":"Anuradha Alahakoon, Bertram Jenkins, Rhiannon Smith, Nick Reid","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10945-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10945-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Permaculture, originating in 1970s Australia, is an agroecological design system and movement founded on specific ethics and principles. It has since expanded globally, promoting agricultural systems that emulate natural processes and the communities that tend them. As we approach its 50th anniversary, we contend that permaculture provides a robust framework for global agroecological initiatives. However, permaculture is not without its critics. It has been argued that permaculture is largely influenced by Global North perspectives and inadvertently perpetuates obstacles to inclusivity, gender diversity, minority representation, and acknowledgment of traditional knowledge. Strategies to address these challenges are identified by re-examining permaculture’s foundational ethics and principles. Drawing on Global South perspectives, decolonising approaches, and holistic ecological frameworks, the paper illustrates the utility of southern theory for agroecological research to advance the essential North–South knowledge dialogue in agroecology scholarship.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10945-y.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Generational differences in farming: impacts on workplace relationships and mental health","authors":"Amanda Hay, Nicky Stanley-Clarke, Jorie Knook, Katie Bardsley","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10941-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10941-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores younger farmers’ perspectives on how generational differences in values, beliefs and attitudes impact wellbeing and working relationships in agricultural settings. Generational theory contends that these differences are shaped by the sociocultural and historical contexts in which each generation has been raised. This research is situated within the New Zealand farming context and draws on 19 semi-structured interviews with young farmers and agricultural industry representatives. Informed by generational theory, we found that young farmers experience a generational divide between older and younger farmers’ values, beliefs and attitudes towards mental health and wellbeing, work ethic, relationships and roles on farm. While these generational differences are reflected in what the young farmers valued and prioritised, we discovered continuity in farming culture through prevailing ideas and attitudes passed through generations via intergenerational cultural transmission. This cultural transmission of predominantly stoic farmer attitudes contrasted with the generational beliefs of younger farmers. It resulted in perpetuating actions, behaviours and practices that did not align with their beliefs which affected their coping strategies and willingness to seek help in challenging times. The findings provide learnings and opportunities for better addressing mental health stigma in farming and improving intergenerational communication in agricultural workplace settings. Furthermore, the findings expand the literature on generational differences in farming through a focus on day to day working relationships on farm from the perspectives of young farmers, including those working on non-family members’ farms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10941-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The social life of sustainability incentives: recognition infrastructures and the politics of change in a soil health program","authors":"Michael Carolan, Adam Snitker, James Hale","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10946-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10946-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainability policies in U.S. agriculture increasingly employ various incentives—such as financial payments, market signals, technical assistance, and recognition systems—to motivate farmers to adopt environmentally friendly practices, though their effectiveness varies widely. This paper argues that incentives, broadly defined, cannot be fully understood without considering the social and institutional structures that give them meaning. Through qualitative interviews, survey data, program documents (including meeting notes with administrators), and participant observation from the Colorado Soil Health Program, the study examines how different motivators are perceived and activated within farming communities. The paper introduces the concept of “recognition infrastructures” to describe the social, material, and organizational elements that give meaning to incentives. The analysis explains why incentives connected to well-established recognition infrastructures—such as financial payments integrated into familiar farm accounting and market practices—are easier for farmers to understand and more likely to influence their decisions. Conversely, symbolic incentives aimed at publicly acknowledging soil stewardship operate within more uncertain social infrastructures, as exemplified by farmers who are unsure whether symbols such as ratings or program signage carry significance among peers or in markets. Sometimes, making these incentives more visible even posed social risks. The results indicate that symbolic incentives circulate within uneven spaces where existing hierarchies of trust, reputation, and institutional ties determine who benefits from recognition. Overall, the paper suggests that lasting change depends not only on creating effective incentives but also on developing recognition infrastructures that help these incentives generate enduring social value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hope Davies Fisher, Bruce G. Ferguson, Juliana Merçon, Antonio Saldívar Moreno
{"title":"Towards critical food systems education: perspectives of public-school students in rural Chiapas, Mexico","authors":"Hope Davies Fisher, Bruce G. Ferguson, Juliana Merçon, Antonio Saldívar Moreno","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10919-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10919-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nutrition education often assumes a reductionist stance that overlooks structural inequity and marginalizes traditional food practices and knowledge. In response, critical food systems education (CFSE) seeks to form subjects who transform food systems. This article contributes to critical food systems education through an empirical study using participatory, arts-based research with rural secondary school students in Chiapas, Mexico. Employing photovoice as the central method, we explore youth narratives of food systems change, recognizing youth as active members of their communities who shape food systems materially and epistemologically. Youth expressed concern over the rise in diet-related disease and the decline in food traditions, situating these issues in broader transformations of rural life. Their narratives reveal how young people emotionally experience these changes while negotiating tensions between public health messaging, family food traditions, and the realities of everyday life. Across their reflections, care was a call to action that linked people, community, and environment in a relational understanding of health. These narratives point to the resilience of traditional foodways through affective connections to family and place. By centering care for family, land, and community, CFSE may contribute to community food sovereignty. The recent <i>Nueva Escuela Mexicana</i> curricular reforms create opportunities for creative, participatory approaches like photovoice to strengthen relationships between schools and communities and foster critical reflection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Timotijevic, C. Jenkinson, C. Fife-Schaw, L. Mohebati, M. M. Raats, C. Hodgkins, H. Rodrigues, G. M. Breakwell
{"title":"Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of the food citizenship concept","authors":"L. Timotijevic, C. Jenkinson, C. Fife-Schaw, L. Mohebati, M. M. Raats, C. Hodgkins, H. Rodrigues, G. M. Breakwell","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10915-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10915-4","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food citizenship (FC) offers a critical lens for reimagining food systems and advancing more sustainable, democratic forms of governance. Despite its normative appeal, FC remains conceptually underdeveloped and empirically untested. This study develops and validates a conceptual framework for understanding the psychological dimensions of food citizenship and operationalises it using standard psychometric procedures. We hypothesised that a sense of responsibility, personal values, food system-related knowledge, and food citizenship behaviours constitute four interrelated facets of FC multidimensional construct. Through an expert review study, lay cognitive interviews, and an online survey (<i>N</i> = 400), we identified four empirically distinct yet connected dimensions: <i>citizen responsibilities, behaviours directed toward food system change, behaviours to reduce food waste,</i> and <i>a person valuing the sustainable food system</i>. Each dimension captures a specific aspect of how individuals engage with food citizenship across contexts. By operationalising food citizenship as a measurable construct, this study advances understanding of its psychological foundations and highlights its policy relevance as both an individual characteristic and a mechanism for promoting food system change. It offers a means to assess public engagement with food systems, allowing policymakers to track shifts over time and across demographic contexts, and to inform the development of policy interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10915-4.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Barth, Safura Abdool Karim, Anne Barnhill, Katelyn Esmonde
{"title":"“The win-win is we need to talk about it”: how U.S. and Canadian food system actors navigate trade-offs in food system transformation","authors":"Jessica Barth, Safura Abdool Karim, Anne Barnhill, Katelyn Esmonde","doi":"10.1007/s10460-026-10927-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10460-026-10927-0","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global food system faces intersecting challenges that have prompted calls for transformation. Central to this transformation is the management of trade-offs when balancing competing goals such as health, environmental sustainability, and equity. This qualitative study explores how food system actors navigate these trade-offs while working to shift local food systems in a positive direction. From January to April 2024, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 food system actors in U.S. and Canadian cities who had knowledge of food system transitions. Interviews were transcribed, iteratively coded, and thematically analyzed. While participants reported alignment between the various goals of food system transformation, conflicts frequently emerged. In cases where these conflicts could not be resolved, participants had to engage in trade-offs. Cost, acceptability, and food security emerged as dominant considerations in trade-offs, often constraining efforts to promote a more healthful, environmentally sustainable, and equitable food system. While grappling with these trade-offs, participants remained optimistic that food system reform was possible, suggesting that transformations are mostly hindered by narrowly framed objectives and structural features of the food system that make it difficult to enact or maintain transformative policies that challenge the status quo. We propose that transformation in the food system can be more readily achieved by reframing ineliminable trade-offs as an opportunity to balance the objectives of transformations more meaningfully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"43 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-026-10927-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148750830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}