“A farm is viable if it can keep its head above water”: defining and measuring farm viability for small and mid-sized farms

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Analena Bruce, Elise Neidecker, Luyue Zheng, Isaac Sohn Leslie, Alexa Wilhelm
{"title":"“A farm is viable if it can keep its head above water”: defining and measuring farm viability for small and mid-sized farms","authors":"Analena Bruce,&nbsp;Elise Neidecker,&nbsp;Luyue Zheng,&nbsp;Isaac Sohn Leslie,&nbsp;Alexa Wilhelm","doi":"10.1007/s10460-024-10687-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The way farm viability is defined and conceptualized has become increasingly incongruent with the way that small-scale farmers make a living, as their livelihood strategies have evolved and changed in response to broad structural changes over the past several decades. Farm viability is typically defined as meeting the income needs of the farm family as well as supporting the farm’s operating costs. However, our study shows that New England farmers define farm viability as their ability to stay in business and to keep the land in agriculture. In this paper, we bring together the agricultural economics and rural sociological research literature on farm viability and persistence as well as food justice scholarship to advance the development of a more relevant and integrated approach to evaluating the viability of small and mid-sized farms. We present farmers’ own conceptions of farm viability, drawn from 37 interviews with the operators of small farms in New England. While most of the farmers we interviewed conceptualize farm viability as their ability to stay in business, many of them shared broader views of farm viability that integrated the social and environmental sustainability of their enterprises in the face of financial pressures and increased weather extremes from climate change. These were described as their ability to continue farming year after year and keep their land in agriculture, and their ability to maintain their own health and wellbeing as integral to a viable farm enterprise. Farmers emphasized their (in)ability to continue farming from a social sustainability standpoint as directly impacting the viability of their farms. We argue for a shift away from narrow measures of farm viability that are solely based on farm owners’ household income to a broader, multidimensional approach to defining and measuring farm viability that could enable analyses that are relevant to critical sustainability concerns for US agriculture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 2","pages":"625 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-024-10687-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-024-10687-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way farm viability is defined and conceptualized has become increasingly incongruent with the way that small-scale farmers make a living, as their livelihood strategies have evolved and changed in response to broad structural changes over the past several decades. Farm viability is typically defined as meeting the income needs of the farm family as well as supporting the farm’s operating costs. However, our study shows that New England farmers define farm viability as their ability to stay in business and to keep the land in agriculture. In this paper, we bring together the agricultural economics and rural sociological research literature on farm viability and persistence as well as food justice scholarship to advance the development of a more relevant and integrated approach to evaluating the viability of small and mid-sized farms. We present farmers’ own conceptions of farm viability, drawn from 37 interviews with the operators of small farms in New England. While most of the farmers we interviewed conceptualize farm viability as their ability to stay in business, many of them shared broader views of farm viability that integrated the social and environmental sustainability of their enterprises in the face of financial pressures and increased weather extremes from climate change. These were described as their ability to continue farming year after year and keep their land in agriculture, and their ability to maintain their own health and wellbeing as integral to a viable farm enterprise. Farmers emphasized their (in)ability to continue farming from a social sustainability standpoint as directly impacting the viability of their farms. We argue for a shift away from narrow measures of farm viability that are solely based on farm owners’ household income to a broader, multidimensional approach to defining and measuring farm viability that could enable analyses that are relevant to critical sustainability concerns for US agriculture.

“如果一个农场能让它的头浮出水面,它就是可行的”:定义和衡量中小型农场的农场可行性
农场生存能力的定义和概念化方式与小农谋生的方式越来越不一致,因为他们的生计战略在过去几十年里随着广泛的结构变化而演变和改变。农场的生存能力通常被定义为满足农场家庭的收入需求以及支持农场的运营成本。然而,我们的研究表明,新英格兰农民将农场生存能力定义为他们保持经营和保持土地用于农业的能力。在本文中,我们汇集了农业经济学和农村社会学关于农场生存能力和持久性的研究文献,以及食品正义奖学金,以促进发展一种更相关和综合的方法来评估中小型农场的生存能力。我们从对新英格兰小农场经营者的37次访谈中得出了农民自己对农场生存能力的看法。虽然我们采访的大多数农民将农场可行性概念化为他们保持经营的能力,但他们中的许多人对农场可行性有着更广泛的看法,即在面临财务压力和气候变化导致的极端天气增加的情况下,将企业的社会和环境可持续性结合起来。这些能力被描述为他们年复一年继续耕种并保持其土地用于农业的能力,以及他们维持自身健康和福祉的能力,作为一个可行的农场企业的组成部分。农民们强调,从社会可持续性的角度来看,他们继续耕种的能力直接影响着农场的生存能力。我们主张从仅仅基于农场主家庭收入的狭隘的农场生存能力衡量转变为更广泛的、多维的方法来定义和衡量农场生存能力,这可以使分析与美国农业的关键可持续性问题相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信