{"title":"来自土壤的鸡:在中国西南食品不信任中合格的地方鸡","authors":"Lyle Fearnley","doi":"10.1007/s10460-025-10702-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chinese consumers value the so-called <i>tuji</i> chicken (‘soil + chicken’) as a local, quality type of poultry. Because <i>tu</i> references both local region and the rural countryside, the <i>tu</i> chicken evokes a contrast with modern improved broilers and the globalized poultry industry, and exemplifies a broader ‘quality turn’ in China’s agri-food system. But what precisely makes a chicken <i>tu</i> (‘local’ and ‘earthy’), and how to identify one that is, are more uncertain and contested questions. Building on literature in food studies, anthropology and geography that unpacks the social construction of definitions of local and quality food, this paper argues that struggles over the <i>definition</i> of the tu chicken are closely linked with consumer strategies for authenticating these definitions in practice. Interviews and fieldwork observations with consumers, poultry vendors and farmers in southwestern China show significant variation in how the <i>tu</i> chicken is defined. But in a context where China’s food safety scandals have produced a climate of food distrust, consumers are as interested in techniques of qualifying or evaluating whether or not particular chickens are <i>tu</i>, as they are in contesting or constructing the abstract definition of <i>tu</i> chickens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 3","pages":"1623 - 1635"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chicken from the soil: qualifying local chicken amidst food distrust in southwestern China\",\"authors\":\"Lyle Fearnley\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10460-025-10702-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Chinese consumers value the so-called <i>tuji</i> chicken (‘soil + chicken’) as a local, quality type of poultry. Because <i>tu</i> references both local region and the rural countryside, the <i>tu</i> chicken evokes a contrast with modern improved broilers and the globalized poultry industry, and exemplifies a broader ‘quality turn’ in China’s agri-food system. But what precisely makes a chicken <i>tu</i> (‘local’ and ‘earthy’), and how to identify one that is, are more uncertain and contested questions. Building on literature in food studies, anthropology and geography that unpacks the social construction of definitions of local and quality food, this paper argues that struggles over the <i>definition</i> of the tu chicken are closely linked with consumer strategies for authenticating these definitions in practice. Interviews and fieldwork observations with consumers, poultry vendors and farmers in southwestern China show significant variation in how the <i>tu</i> chicken is defined. But in a context where China’s food safety scandals have produced a climate of food distrust, consumers are as interested in techniques of qualifying or evaluating whether or not particular chickens are <i>tu</i>, as they are in contesting or constructing the abstract definition of <i>tu</i> chickens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"1623 - 1635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10702-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10702-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Chicken from the soil: qualifying local chicken amidst food distrust in southwestern China
Chinese consumers value the so-called tuji chicken (‘soil + chicken’) as a local, quality type of poultry. Because tu references both local region and the rural countryside, the tu chicken evokes a contrast with modern improved broilers and the globalized poultry industry, and exemplifies a broader ‘quality turn’ in China’s agri-food system. But what precisely makes a chicken tu (‘local’ and ‘earthy’), and how to identify one that is, are more uncertain and contested questions. Building on literature in food studies, anthropology and geography that unpacks the social construction of definitions of local and quality food, this paper argues that struggles over the definition of the tu chicken are closely linked with consumer strategies for authenticating these definitions in practice. Interviews and fieldwork observations with consumers, poultry vendors and farmers in southwestern China show significant variation in how the tu chicken is defined. But in a context where China’s food safety scandals have produced a climate of food distrust, consumers are as interested in techniques of qualifying or evaluating whether or not particular chickens are tu, as they are in contesting or constructing the abstract definition of tu chickens.
期刊介绍:
Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems.
To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.