Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies最新文献_第6页

Co-producing better land management? An ethnographic study of partnership working in the context of agricultural diffuse pollution. 共同生产更好的土地管理?农业扩散污染背景下合作伙伴关系的民族志研究。

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-16 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-022-00170-6

Thomas Vetter

{"title":"Co-producing better land management? An ethnographic study of partnership working in the context of agricultural diffuse pollution.","authors":"Thomas Vetter","doi":"10.1007/s41130-022-00170-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-022-00170-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Partnership working has become a normative principle within agri-environmental governance. With more and more benefits becoming attributed to closer multi-stakeholder collaboration, more public monies are being directed towards this cause. These benefits have been studied widely and are usually presented in terms of their contributions to environmental, economic and/or social objectives. However, in contrast to these reported outcomes of partnership working, the practical ways towards them have received little attention. What does it mean to work together on a day-to-day basis? More specifically, how do stakeholders become trusted partners, bridge interests and coordinate their actions? What collaborative working culture becomes established within partnerships and how does this in turn affect wider governance outcomes, expectations and aspirations? Answers to these questions are not only important to better understand the factors that contribute to successful ways of partnership working, but also to account for its limitations. This paper responds to this research need by drawing on the example of Farm Herefordshire. This cross-organizational partnership promotes profitable farming, healthy soils and clean water to address the problem of diffuse pollution from agricultural practices within the Wye catchment in the UK. The insights from this case study contribute to the literature in two major ways: firstly, the paper follows prompts to study such modes of collective action holistically and bottom-up to capture all their contributions and implications. It does so by employing an ethnographic research approach to investigate the social interactions and struggles that characterize joint working. This commands attention to the backstories, the actual work meetings, the discussions, the processes of consensus building, and the joint actions undertaken; secondly, the paper connects with wider social science concerns around the underlying processes and practices of governmentality that are essential for establishing social and ecological orders. Thus, the paper explores how everyday practices of partnership working contribute to the co-production of institutions, discourses, identities, and representations-which in this case become strategically deployed to nudge-rather than revolutionise-better land management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74691,"journal":{"name":"Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies","volume":"103 2","pages":"117-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469210/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40367427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

From "noble" to "ugly" but "well-worked" fish-food morals in the Breton fish landings. 从“高贵”到“丑陋”但“运作良好”的鱼食道德在布列塔尼鱼登陆。

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-022-00185-z

Fabien Clouette

引用次数: 1

From farmers’ rights to the rights of peasants: seeds and the biocultural turn 从农民权利到农民权利:种子与生物文化转向

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00163-x

F. Girard, C. Frison

引用次数: 1

In defense of farmer saved seeds 为了保护农民保存的种子

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00162-y

R. Gray

引用次数: 2

On the role of farmers in seed innovations: a brief introduction 论农民在种子创新中的作用:简要介绍

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00161-z

S. Lemarié

引用次数: 0

Farms, food regimes, and the power of small stories 农场，食物制度，小故事的力量

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00160-0

H. Campbell

引用次数: 0

Sustainable food labelling: considerations for policy-makers 可持续食品标签:对决策者的考虑

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00156-w

Alexander J. Stein, Marcelo de Lima

引用次数: 5

Cultivating power, enacting consent. A critical review of ‘Seeds of power. Environmental injustice and genetically modified soybeans in Argentina’, (A. Leguizamón) 2020, Duke University Press, 221 p 培养权力，达成共识。对《权力的种子》的批判性评论。阿根廷的环境不公与转基因大豆，(A. Leguizamón) 2020，杜克大学出版社，221页

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00158-8

P. Delvenne

引用次数: 0

Book review symposium: Hugh Campbell: farming inside invisible worlds—modernist agriculture and its consequences 书评研讨会:休·坎贝尔:无形世界中的农业——现代农业及其后果

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00157-9

Ronan Le Velly, A. Mol, P. McMichael

引用次数: 0

Correction to: Can fair trade resolve the “hungry farmer paradox”? 更正:公平贸易能解决“饥饿农民悖论”吗?

Review of agricultural, food and environmental studies Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI: 10.1007/s41130-021-00155-x

N. Sirdey, S. Lemeilleur

引用次数: 0