Primary health care research & development最新文献

{"title":"Reduction of anxiety symptoms among women within a collaborative care model and women's health settings.","authors":"Lindsay R Standeven, Kristen N Miller, Alissa Mallow, Roni Berger, Virna Little","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000440","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study is to focus on changes in anxiety symptoms among women treated in women's health practices and under a collaborative care model.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on collaborative care has largely focused on improving depressive and anxiety symptoms among adults in primary care settings. The applicability of collaborative care in other healthcare settings is underreported with limited research investigating if collaborative care has advantages in subpopulations treated in both traditional primary care settings and other healthcare settings, such as women's health practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, completed through secondary data analysis of the electronic record of N = 219 women across three women's healthcare centers, evaluated if instituting a collaborative care model is associated with reduced anxiety symptoms and which factors (eg, primary diagnosis, duration of care, and use of psychotropic medications) are associated with anxiety outcomes. Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) at entry into and at termination from collaborative care services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was a significant reduction in average anxiety scores from baseline to termination of collaborative care (<i>t</i>(218) = 12.41, <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was a main effect for the duration of time receiving collaborative care services on anxiety score reduction (β = -0.28, SE = 0.06, <i>P</i> < 0.001) with a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms at the 90-day mark (<i>t</i>(218) = 10.58, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Therefore, collaborative care can be useful in women's health practices in reducing anxiety symptoms over a 90-day time period.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10790713/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138479763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Speaking the same language - a scoping review to identify the terminology associated with social prescribing.","authors":"Simon Newstead, Megan Elliott, Dawn Cavanagh, Sion Tetlow, Carolyn Wallace","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000567","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000567","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the social prescribing-related terminology within the peer-reviewed literature of the UK and the grey literature from Wales.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Social prescribing has seen a period of development that has been accompanied by a proliferation of related terminology and a lack of standardisation in the manner in which it is employed. This creates barriers to engagement and impairs communication, both between professionals and members of the public. The Wales School for Social Prescribing Research and Public Health Wales committed to the development of a glossary of terms for social prescribing, to facilitate the clarification and standardisation of the associated terminology. Here, we describe the first step in that process.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review of the peer-reviewed UK literature and Welsh grey literature was conducted. The titles and abstracts of 46,242 documents and the full text of 738 documents were screened. Data were charted from 205 documents. Data capture included terminology, the location within the UK of the research or intervention described in the article, and the perspective from which the article was authored. A general inductive approach was used to categorise the terms by theme.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This research serves to highlight the breadth and diversity of the terminology associated with social prescribing. Results demonstrate aspects of shared commonality and clear distinction between the terminology from the two literature sources. The greatest contributions of terms were from articles that examined research and/or interventions in England and that were authored from the perspective of health or health and social care. The research indicates that nation- and sector-specific terms may not be adequately represented in the literature at large. Looking forward, it will be important to ensure that social prescribing terminology within the UK literature is culturally relevant and accurately reflects the terminology used by the workforce who encounter and deliver social prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689092/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138447438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Access to episodic primary care: a cross-sectional comparison of walk-in clinics and urgent primary care centers in British Columbia.","authors":"Mary A McCracken, Ian R Cooper, Michee-Ana Hamilton, Jan Klimas, Cameron Lindsay, Sarah Fletcher, Morgan Price, Lindsay Hedden, Rita K McCracken","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000580","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000580","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify publicly reported access characteristics for episodic primary care in BC and provided a clinic-level comparison between walk-in clinics and UPCCs.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Walk-in clinics are non-hospital-based primary care facilities that are designed to operate without appointments and provide increased healthcare access with extended hours. Urgent and Primary Care Centres (UPCCs) were introduced to British Columbia (BC) in 2018 as an additional primary care resource that provided urgent, but not emergent care during extended hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from all walk-in clinics and UPCCs in BC. A structured data collection form was used to record access characteristics from clinic websites, including business hours, weekend availability, attachment to a longitudinal family practice, and provision of virtual services.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, 268 clinics were included in the analysis (243 walk-in clinics, 25 UPCCs). Of those, 225 walk-in clinics (92.6%) and two UPCCs (8.0%) were attached to a longitudinal family practice. Only 153 (63%) walk-in clinics offered weekend services, compared to 24 (96%) of UPCCs. Walk-in clinics offered the majority (8,968.6/ 78.4%) of their service hours between 08:00 and 17:00, Monday to Friday. UPCCs offered the majority (889.3/ 53.7%) of their service hours after 17:00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most walk-in clinics were associated with a longitudinal family practice and provided the majority of clinic services during typical business hours. More research that includes patient characteristics and care outcomes, analyzed at the clinic level, may be useful to support the optimization of episodic primary healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689093/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138447436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Editorial: Developing research potential in the primary and community-nursing workforce: the impact of a community of practice.","authors":"Eleanor Hoverd, Joanne Cooper, Sue Shortland, Peter Zeh, Ben Bowers, Lee Tomlinson, Sandra Dyer, Paula Boyer, Jen Charlewood, Andrew Finney","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000543","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000543","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689090/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138447437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"How does evidence-based medicine training affect medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine and the conspiracy theories about COVID-19: a nationwide study.","authors":"Özlem Coşkun, Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Işıl İrem Budakoğlu","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000464","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000464","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>It was aimed to explore the relationship between evidence-based medicine (EBM) training and medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students constitute the future workforce of primary health care services. The relationship between EBM training and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19 is critical to explore for providing a better primary health care. The relationship EBM training and medical students' views on TCAM is also important in this regard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study. Turkish medical students were surveyed about EBM training, TCAM, and COVID-19 conspiracies. The electronic survey form consisted of five parts: Demographic characteristics, views and self-perceived knowledge about TCAM and the methods, views on the origin of SARS-COV-2, participation in EBM training, and views on TCAM training. A total of 49 medical schools provided response. Along with descriptive statistics, Chi-square test was utilized.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 2577 participants, 24.0% of them believed SARS-COV-2 was artificially designed. The students who have participated in EBM training via both lecture and small group discussions have a less positive view on TCAM than both the students who have not participated in any EBM training (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the students who participated in only-lectures (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant association between EBM training and whether believing COVID-19 (SARS-COV-2) has been designed purposefully by some people or it has emerged naturally <i>χ</i>² (1) = 17.21 <i>p</i> < 0.001. The odds of thinking COVID-19 emerged naturally was 1.85 times higher (95% CI: 1.38-2.47) if the students have participated in EBM training via both lectures and small group discussions than if they have not participated in any EBM training. EBM training affects medical students in terms of beliefs on COVID-19 conspiracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689091/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138300728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Agreement and consistency in the triaging of musculoskeletal primary care referrals by vetting clinicians using a knowledge-based triage tool.","authors":"F M Shorthouse, N Griffin, C McNicholas, N Spahr, G Jones","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000361","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000361","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care referrals received by secondary care services are vetted or triaged to pathways best suited for patients' needs. If knowledge-based triaging is used by vetting clinicians, accuracy is required to avoid incorrect decisions being made. With limited evidence to support best practice, we aimed to evaluate consistency across vetting clinicians' decisions and their agreement with a criterion decision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine trained vetting clinicians (18 female) representative of pay grades independently triaged five musculoskeletal physiotherapy referral cases into one of 10 decisions using an internally developed triage tool. Agreement across clinicians' decisions between and within cases was assessed using Fleiss's kappa overall and within pay grade. Proportions of triage decisions consistent with criterion decisions were assessed using Cochran's <i>Q</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinician agreement was fair for all cases (<i>κ</i> = 0.385) irrespective of pay grade but varied within clinical cases (<i>κ</i> = -0.014-0.786). Proportions of correct triage decisions were significantly different across cases [<i>Q</i>(4) = 33.80, <i>P</i> < 0.001] ranging from 17% to 83%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agreement and consistency in decisions were variable using the tool. Ensuring referrer information is accurate is vital, as is developing, automating and auditing standards for certain referrals with clear pathways. But we argue that variable vetting outcomes might represent healthy pathway abundance and should not simply be automated in response to perceived inefficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10790367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50164032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The role of primary health care in long-term care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in 30 European countries: a retrospective descriptive study (Eurodata study).","authors":"Marina Guisado-Clavero, Sara Ares-Blanco, Alice Serafini, Lourdes Ramos Del Rio, Ileana Gefaell Larrondo, Louise Fitzgerald, Shlomo Vinker, Gijs van Pottebergh, Kirsi Valtonen, Bert Vaes, Canan Tuz Yilmaz, Péter Torzsa, Paula Tilli, Theresa Sentker, Bohumil Seifert, Natalija Saurek-Aleksandrovska, Martin Sattler, Goranka Petricek, Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Davorina Petek, Ábel Perjés, Naldy Parodi López, Ana Luisa Neves, Liubovė Murauskienė, Heidrun Lingner, Katarzyna Nessler, Bruno Heleno, Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka, Milena Kostić, Büsra Çimen Korkmaz, Snežana Knežević, Aleksandar Kirkovski, Vasilis Trifon Karathanos, Marijana Jandrić-Kočić, Shushman Ivanna, Оксана Ільков, Kathryn Hoffmann, Miroslav Hanževački, Mila Gómez-Johansson, Dragan Gjorgjievski, Philippe-Richard J Domeyer, Maryher Delphin Peña, Asja Ćosić Divjak, Iliana-Carmen Busneag, Elena Brutskaya-Stempkovskaya, Sabine Bayen, Maria Bakola, Limor Adler, Radost Assenova, María Pilar Astier-Peña, Raquel Gómez Bravo","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000312","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Primary health care (PHC) supported long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in attending COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study is to describe the role of PHC in LTCFs in Europe during the early phase of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective descriptive study from 30 European countries using data from September 2020 collected with an ad hoc semi-structured questionnaire. Related variables are SARS-CoV-2 testing, contact tracing, follow-up, additional testing, and patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six out of the 30 European countries had PHC involvement in LTCFs during the COVID-19 pandemic. PHC participated in initial medical care in 22 countries, while, in 15, PHC was responsible for SARS-CoV-2 test along with other institutions. Supervision of individuals in isolation was carried out mostly by LTCF staff, but physical examination or symptom's follow-up was performed mainly by PHC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PHC has participated in COVID-19 pandemic assistance in LTCFs in coordination with LTCF staff, public health officers, and hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49694850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Disparities in health and nutrition between semi-urban and rural mothers and birth outcomes of their newborns in Bukavu, DR Congo: a baseline assessment.","authors":"Damaris Elisabeth Beitze, Céline Kavira Malengera, Theophile Barhwamire Kabesha, Jan Frank, Veronika Scherbaum","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000518","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000518","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aimed to evaluate health and nutritional practices of mothers during pregnancy and birth outcomes of their newborns in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), comparing semi-urban and rural areas.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Health and nutrition during pregnancy are crucial for adequate development of the fetus. Health care plays an important role but is often poor in rural areas of developing countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A baseline survey of a nutritional follow-up study was conducted in two semi-urban and one rural hospital in the vicinity of Bukavu, DRC. In total, 471 mother-child pairs were recruited after delivery. Data collection included socio-demographic parameters, nutrition and health measures during pregnancy, and anthropometric parameters. Semi-urban and rural study locations were compared and predictors of birth weight evaluated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Semi-urban and rural mothers differed significantly in nutrition and health practices during pregnancy, as well as birth outcomes. In the rural area, there was a higher rate of newborns with low birth weight (10.7%) and lower rates of antimalarial medication (80.8%), deworming (24.6%), consumption of nutritional supplements (81.5%), and being informed about nutrition by medical staff (32.8%) during pregnancy as well as practicing family planning (3.1%) than in the semi-urban areas (2.7%, 88.6%, 88.3%; 89.3%, 46.5%, and 17.1%, respectively). Birth weight was positively predicted by increasing maternal MUAC, age, and gestational age and negatively by rural location, being primipara, being a farmer, and female newborn sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of strengthening antenatal care activities especially in rural areas in order to ameliorate both maternal and infantile health and ensure appropriate development.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/37/S1463423623000518a.PMC10594532.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49694848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Relational care and epistemic injustice.","authors":"Rupal Shah, Sanjiv Ahluwalia, John Spicer","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000555","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The philosophical underpinnings of primary care have been examined from several perspectives in recent years. In two previous articles, we have argued that a relational view of autonomy is better matched to the primary care setting than others, and that view is mainly formed from the descriptors of its practice. Here we develop that analysis further, linking it to other relevant theory: the experience of human suffering and epistemic injustice. We argue that relational care is fundamental to ameliorating epistemic injustice and that relationships are integral to ethical practice, rather than being distinct. We propose that personalised care as described in the NHS Long Term Plan is not possible without addressing epistemic injustice and therefore without reconsidering our existing normative ethical frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594641/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49694849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Postpartum family planning attitudes among Turkish women: development of a reliable and valid scale.","authors":"Zeynep Sedef Varol,&nbsp;Meltem Çiçeklioğlu","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000476","DOIUrl":"10.1017/S1463423623000476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a scale based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) to assess the family planning (FP) attitudes of postpartum women with 0- to 12-month-old infants residing in eight neighbourhoods of the Bornova province, Izmir, Turkey.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Family planning is an integral component of maternal and infant health during the postpartum period and is a fundamental aspect of healthcare services in the prenatal and postnatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Postpartum Family Planning Attitude Scale (PFPAS) was developed in four stages: item pool development, content validity evaluation, pilot study, and reliability and validity assessment. The PFPAS was administered to 292 women. The developed scale comprised 27 items and six sub-dimensions. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the scale. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.88, indicating good reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis validated the structural validity of the scale, with a chi-square/degree of freedom ratio of 2.24, an RMSEA value of 0.068, and a CFI value of 0.95. The lowest and highest possible scores for the PFPAS were 27 and 135, respectively, with a mean total score of 105.32 ± 11.91.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594533/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41241942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}