世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯对高血压慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰和血压控制的影响:一项横断面研究。

Siwaluk Srikrajang, Narucha Komolsuradej, Sirawee Chaovalit, Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon
{"title":"世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯对高血压慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰和血压控制的影响:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Siwaluk Srikrajang, Narucha Komolsuradej, Sirawee Chaovalit, Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon","doi":"10.1017/S1463423624000367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of pain management according to the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder on pain severity, pain interference, and blood pressure (BP) in treated hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management can affect BP control owing to the proposed mechanism by which persistent pain contributes to increased BP. However, there are inadequate studies investigating the benefit of pain management in controlling both pain and BP in hypertensive patients who have chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, demographic data and pain characteristics (resting pain score on the numerical pain rating scale, pain severity, and pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory) were collected via face-to-face interviews. BP was measured thrice on the same day. Data on pain medications taken in the previous 1 month were retrieved from the medical records. Participants were categorized into three groups following pain management patterns according to the WHO analgesic ladder: no, partial, and complete treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) was used to analyse the association between the variables and uncontrolled BP.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 210 participants, the mean (standard deviation) age was 68 (15.5) years, and 60.47% had uncontrolled BP. The resting pain score, pain severity, and pain interference subscale scores of the complete treatment group were significantly lower than that of the partial treatment group (<i>P</i> = 0.036, 0.026, and 0.044, respectively). The MLRA revealed that pain management patterns were associated with uncontrolled BP (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 6.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.71-16.78; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and resting pain scores (AOR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04-1.38; <i>P</i> = 0.048). Our findings suggest that pain management patterns adhering to the WHO analgesic ladder can reduce pain severity and pain interference and also control BP in hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the WHO analgesic ladder on pain severity, pain interference, and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Siwaluk Srikrajang, Narucha Komolsuradej, Sirawee Chaovalit, Chaiwat Chuaychoosakoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1463423624000367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of pain management according to the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder on pain severity, pain interference, and blood pressure (BP) in treated hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management can affect BP control owing to the proposed mechanism by which persistent pain contributes to increased BP. However, there are inadequate studies investigating the benefit of pain management in controlling both pain and BP in hypertensive patients who have chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, demographic data and pain characteristics (resting pain score on the numerical pain rating scale, pain severity, and pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory) were collected via face-to-face interviews. BP was measured thrice on the same day. Data on pain medications taken in the previous 1 month were retrieved from the medical records. Participants were categorized into three groups following pain management patterns according to the WHO analgesic ladder: no, partial, and complete treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) was used to analyse the association between the variables and uncontrolled BP.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 210 participants, the mean (standard deviation) age was 68 (15.5) years, and 60.47% had uncontrolled BP. The resting pain score, pain severity, and pain interference subscale scores of the complete treatment group were significantly lower than that of the partial treatment group (<i>P</i> = 0.036, 0.026, and 0.044, respectively). The MLRA revealed that pain management patterns were associated with uncontrolled BP (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 6.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.71-16.78; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and resting pain scores (AOR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04-1.38; <i>P</i> = 0.048). Our findings suggest that pain management patterns adhering to the WHO analgesic ladder can reduce pain severity and pain interference and also control BP in hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"e43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary health care research & development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查按照世界卫生组织(WHO)镇痛阶梯对患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的高血压患者进行疼痛治疗对疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰和血压(BP)的影响:背景:由于持续疼痛导致血压升高的机制已被提出,因此疼痛治疗会影响血压控制。背景:疼痛治疗会影响血压控制,这是因为存在持续疼痛导致血压升高的机制。然而,目前还没有足够的研究调查疼痛治疗对慢性疼痛的高血压患者控制疼痛和血压的益处:在这项横断面研究中,通过面对面访谈收集了人口统计学数据和疼痛特征(数字疼痛评分量表中的静息痛评分、疼痛严重程度和简明疼痛量表中的疼痛干扰分量表)。血压在同一天测量三次。从医疗记录中获取了前 1 个月服用止痛药物的数据。根据世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯将参与者按照疼痛治疗模式分为三组:无治疗、部分治疗和完全治疗。多变量逻辑回归分析(MLRA)用于分析变量与血压失控之间的关系:在 210 名参与者中,平均(标准差)年龄为 68(15.5)岁,60.47% 的人血压未得到控制。完全治疗组的静息痛评分、疼痛严重程度和疼痛干扰分量表评分明显低于部分治疗组(P = 0.036、0.026 和 0.044)。MLRA 显示,疼痛管理模式与血压失控相关(调整赔率比 [AOR]:6.75;95% 置信区间 [CI]:2.71-16.78;P < 0.001),与静息痛评分相关(AOR:1.17;95% CI:1.04-1.38;P = 0.048)。我们的研究结果表明,遵循世界卫生组织镇痛阶梯的疼痛管理模式可以减轻疼痛的严重程度和疼痛干扰,还能控制慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的高血压患者的血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the WHO analgesic ladder on pain severity, pain interference, and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional study.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of pain management according to the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder on pain severity, pain interference, and blood pressure (BP) in treated hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Background: Pain management can affect BP control owing to the proposed mechanism by which persistent pain contributes to increased BP. However, there are inadequate studies investigating the benefit of pain management in controlling both pain and BP in hypertensive patients who have chronic pain.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, demographic data and pain characteristics (resting pain score on the numerical pain rating scale, pain severity, and pain interference subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory) were collected via face-to-face interviews. BP was measured thrice on the same day. Data on pain medications taken in the previous 1 month were retrieved from the medical records. Participants were categorized into three groups following pain management patterns according to the WHO analgesic ladder: no, partial, and complete treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) was used to analyse the association between the variables and uncontrolled BP.

Findings: Among 210 participants, the mean (standard deviation) age was 68 (15.5) years, and 60.47% had uncontrolled BP. The resting pain score, pain severity, and pain interference subscale scores of the complete treatment group were significantly lower than that of the partial treatment group (P = 0.036, 0.026, and 0.044, respectively). The MLRA revealed that pain management patterns were associated with uncontrolled BP (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 6.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.71-16.78; P < 0.001) and resting pain scores (AOR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04-1.38; P = 0.048). Our findings suggest that pain management patterns adhering to the WHO analgesic ladder can reduce pain severity and pain interference and also control BP in hypertensive patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信