Food ethics最新文献_第4页

Calculating the Impacts of Food Gentrification in Portland, Oregon 俄勒冈州波特兰市食品绅士化影响的计算

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-04-24 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-023-00120-y

Karishma Shah

引用次数: 0

Healthy Eating Policy, Public Reason, and the Common Good 健康饮食政策、公共理性和共同利益

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-023-00119-5

Donald B. Thompson

引用次数: 0

We have Some Calves left! Socially Accepted Alternatives to the Current Handling of Male Calves from Dairy Production 我们还剩下几头小牛!社会接受的替代方案，以目前处理从乳制品生产的雄性小牛

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-023-00122-w

M. Schulze, Sarah Kühl, G. Busch

引用次数: 0

Cultured Human Meat Acceptability: From Inviolability of Human Body to Prevention of Induced Human Meat Craving 培养人肉的可接受性：从人体的不可侵犯性到预防诱发的人肉渴求

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-023-00121-x

Marco Locarno

引用次数: 0

Identity and Food Choice: You Are What You Eat? 身份与食物选择:你吃什么就是什么?

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-022-00118-y

Z. Tobias, J. Dieterle

引用次数: 0

Justice in Finnish Food Policies 芬兰食品政策中的正义

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-022-00117-z

Antti Puupponen, S. Huttunen, T. Kortetmäki, A. Lähteenmäki-Uutela, M. Kaljonen

引用次数: 0

Questioning Customs and Traditions in Culinary Ethics: the Case of Cruel and Environmentally Damaging Food Practices 质疑烹饪伦理中的习俗和传统：以残忍和破坏环境的食品做法为例

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-022-00116-0

Lyne Letourneau, Louis-Etienne Pigeon

引用次数: 0

Values of Australian Meat Consumers Related to Sheep and Beef Cattle Welfare: What Makes a Good Life and a Good Death? 与羊和肉牛福利相关的澳大利亚肉类消费者的价值观:怎样才能生得好，死得好?

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-022-00114-2

Emily A Buddle, Heather J Bray, Rachel A Ankeny

{"title":"Values of Australian Meat Consumers Related to Sheep and Beef Cattle Welfare: What Makes a Good Life and a Good Death?","authors":"Emily A Buddle, Heather J Bray, Rachel A Ankeny","doi":"10.1007/s41055-022-00114-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00114-2","url":null,"abstract":"There has been growing global interest in livestock animal welfare. Previous research into attitudes towards animal welfare has focused on Europe and the United States, with comparatively little focus on Australia, which is an important location due to the prominent position of agriculture economically and culturally. In this article, we present results from qualitative research on how Australian meat consumers conceptualise sheep and beef cattle welfare. The study was conducted in two capital cities (Melbourne, Victoria and Adelaide, South Australia) and a much smaller rural centre (Toowoomba, Queensland) using focus groups (involving 40.9% of participants) and mall-intercept interviews (59.1% of participants), totalling 66 participants. Qualitative analysis highlights that participants had clear ideas of what it means for an animal to live a 'good life' and experience a 'good death,' with their beliefs strongly tied to their expectations and cultural understandings of what Australian agriculture 'should be.' In response to open-ended questions, participants expressed attitudes that relied on romanticised visions of the 'rural idyll' as seen in frequent discussions about what is 'normal' for sheep meat and beef production, and relatedly, what count as 'natural behaviours.' Many participants rejected anything associated with the 'other,' classifying it as not 'normal': we argue that which is not considered normal, including intensive production, foreign ownership, and halal slaughter practices, appear to place participants' conceptualizations of an animal's 'good death,' and in turn the potential for a 'good life,' at risk.","PeriodicalId":73041,"journal":{"name":"Food ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753876/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9380774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Multidimensional Food Poverty: Evidence from Low-Income Single Mothers in Contemporary Japan. 多维粮食贫困：来自当代日本低收入单身母亲的证据。

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-023-00123-9

Haruka Ueda

{"title":"Multidimensional Food Poverty: Evidence from Low-Income Single Mothers in Contemporary Japan.","authors":"Haruka Ueda","doi":"10.1007/s41055-023-00123-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s41055-023-00123-9","url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to gain an in-depth understanding of the eating lives of low-income single mothers in Japan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine low-income single mothers living in the three largest urban areas (Tokyo, Hanshin [Osaka and Kobe] and Nagoya) in Japan. Framed by the capability approach and sociology of food, their dietary norms and practices, as well as underlying factors that impact the norm-practice gap were analysed across nine dimensions: meal frequency, place of eating, meal timing, duration, persons to eat with, procurement method, food quality, meal content and pleasure of eating. These mothers were deprived of various types of capabilities, extending not only from the quantity and nutritional aspects of food, but also to spatial, temporal, qualitative and affective aspects. Aside from financial constraints, eight other factors (time, maternal health, parenting difficulties, children's tastes, gendered norms, cooking abilities, food aid and local food environment) were identified as influencing their capabilities to eat well. The findings challenge the view that food poverty is the deprivation of economic resources required to ensure a sufficient amount of food. Social interventions that go beyond monetary aid and food provision need to be proposed.","PeriodicalId":73041,"journal":{"name":"Food ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9611784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

The Curious Case of Baby Formula in the United States in 2022: Cries for Urgent Action Months after Silence in the Midst of Alarm Bells. 2022 年美国婴儿配方奶粉的奇异案例：警钟长鸣数月后的沉默，呼吁采取紧急行动。

Food ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s41055-022-00115-1

Jinho Jung, Nicole Olynk Widmar, Brenna Ellison

引用次数: 0