发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A Latent Class IRT Approach to Defining and Measuring Language Proficiency. 定义和测量语言能力的潜在类别IRT方法。
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.59863/ycua8620
Tammy D Tolar, D. Francis, Paulina A. Kulesz, K. Stuebing
{"title":"A Latent Class IRT Approach to Defining and Measuring Language Proficiency.","authors":"Tammy D Tolar, D. Francis, Paulina A. Kulesz, K. Stuebing","doi":"10.59863/ycua8620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/ycua8620","url":null,"abstract":"English language learner (EL) status has high stakes implications for determining when and how ELs should be evaluated for academic achievement. In the US, students designated as English learners are assessed annually for English language proficiency (ELP), a complex construct whose conceptualization has evolved in recent years to reflect more precisely the language demands of content area achievement as reflected in the standards of individual states and state language assessment consortia, such as WIDA and ELPA21. The goal of this paper was to examine the possible role for and utility of using content area assessments to validate language proficiency mastery criteria. Specifically, we applied mixture item response models to identify two classes of EL students: (1) ELs for whom English language arts and math achievement test items have similar difficulty and discrimination parameters as they do for non-ELs and (2) ELs for whom the test items function differently. We used latent class IRT methods to identify the two groups of ELs and to evaluate the effects of different subscales of ELP (reading, writing, listening, and speaking) on group membership. Only reading and writing were significant predictors of class membership. Cut-scores based on summary scores of ELP were imperfect predictors of class membership and indicated the need for finer differentiation within the top proficiency category. This study demonstrates the importance of linking definitions of ELP to the context for which ELP is used and suggests the possible value of psychometric analyses when language proficiency standards are linked to the language requirements for content area achievement.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"29 1","pages":"49-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81219508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application Innovation of Educational Measurement Theory, Method, and Technology in China’s New College Entrance Examination Reform 教育测量理论、方法和技术在新高考改革中的应用创新
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.59863/cbjl1170
Zhengyan Liang, Minqiang Zhang, Feifei Huang, Derong Kang, Lingling Xu
{"title":"Application Innovation of Educational Measurement Theory, Method, and Technology in China’s New College Entrance Examination Reform","authors":"Zhengyan Liang, Minqiang Zhang, Feifei Huang, Derong Kang, Lingling Xu","doi":"10.59863/cbjl1170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/cbjl1170","url":null,"abstract":"China’s new college entrance examination (the new gaokao) reform provides an opportunity for researchers and practitioners of educational measurement to directly participate in the reform. Therefore, conducting in-depth research on the characteristics of the new gaokao and the issues it faces, and finding corresponding solutions theoretically, methodologically, and technically will not only help to deploy the education examination reform smoothly, but also expand and enrich the research and application of educational measurement. This article provides discussions and suggestions on some issues related to the new gaokao reform, including the stability issue of the examination brought by the scoring methods and subject selection, the equating issue of test scores due to biannual tests or cross-year comparisons, and the issue of giving feedback to basic education based on the analysis of the gaokao data.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89724141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
中国新高考改革中的教育测量理论、方法和技术的应用创新 中国新高考改革中的教育测量理论、方法和技术的应用创新
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI: 10.59863/uhwn1941
正妍 梁, 敏强 张, 菲菲 黄, 德荣 康, 玲玲 徐
{"title":"中国新高考改革中的教育测量理论、方法和技术的应用创新","authors":"正妍 梁, 敏强 张, 菲菲 黄, 德荣 康, 玲玲 徐","doi":"10.59863/uhwn1941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/uhwn1941","url":null,"abstract":"中国新高考改革为教育测量学的研究者和应用者提供了一个直接参与中国高考改革的契机。因而，对新高考的特点及其所面临的问题进行深入研究，并从理论、方法或技术上给出有针对性的解决方案，不仅利于中国新高考改革的顺利开展，还将拓展和丰富教育测量学的研究和应用。本文针对中国新高考改革中由计分方式和自主选科所带来的考试的稳定性问题、不同年度和“一年两考”分数等值问题，以及如何基于高考数据分析对基础教育教学进行反馈的问题，给出了研讨性的研究成果并提出了相应的建议。","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89966193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
中国心理和教育测量发展 中国心理和教育测量发展
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/hoyb3108
厚 张, 方 骆
{"title":"中国心理和教育测量发展","authors":"厚 张, 方 骆","doi":"10.59863/hoyb3108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/hoyb3108","url":null,"abstract":"【本文无摘要。】","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74164627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Development of Psychological and Educational Measurement in China 心理教育测量在中国的发展
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/buai8988
Houcan Zhang, Fang Luo
{"title":"The Development of Psychological and Educational Measurement in China","authors":"Houcan Zhang, Fang Luo","doi":"10.59863/buai8988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/buai8988","url":null,"abstract":"[No abstract.]","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"5 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90149016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
CEJEME创刊号前言 CEJEME创刊号前言
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/rjbo6659
Cai Li, Tao Xin
{"title":"CEJEME创刊号前言","authors":"Cai Li, Tao Xin","doi":"10.59863/rjbo6659","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/rjbo6659","url":null,"abstract":"【本文无摘要。】","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80768562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
De-“Constructing” Test Validation 去“构造”测试验证
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/ckhh8837
S. Sireci
{"title":"De-“Constructing” Test Validation","authors":"S. Sireci","doi":"10.59863/ckhh8837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/ckhh8837","url":null,"abstract":"Construct validity theory presents the most comprehensive description of “validity” as it pertains to educational and psychological testing. The term “construct validity” was introduced in 1954 in the Technical Recommendations for Psychological Tests and Diagnostic Techniques (American Psychological Association [APA], 1954), and subsequently elucidated by two members of the 1954 committee — Cronbach and Meehl (1955). Construct validity theory has had enormous impact on the theoretical descriptions of validity, but it was not explicitly supported by the last two versions of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association [AERA] et al., 1999, 2014). In this article I trace some of the history of the debate regarding the importance of construct validity theory for test val- idation, identify the essential elements of construct validity theory that are critical for validating the use of a test for a particular purpose, and propose a framework for test validation that focuses on test use, rather than test construct. This “de-constructed” approach involves four steps: (a) clearly articulating testing purposes, (b) identifying potential negative consequences of test use, (c) crossing test purposes and potential misuses with the five sources of validity evidence listed in the AERA et al. (2014) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, and (d) prioritizing the sources of validity evidence needed to build a sound validity argument that focuses on test use and consequences. The goals of deconstructed validation are to embrace the major tenets involved in construct validity theory by using them to develop a coherent and comprehensive validity argument that is comprehensible to psychometricians, court justices, policy makers, and the general public; and is consistent with the AERA et al. (2014) Standards.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83654101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Introduction to the Inaugural Issue of CEJEME CEJEME创刊号简介
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/vhqo9263
L. Cai, Tao Xin
{"title":"Introduction to the Inaugural Issue of CEJEME","authors":"L. Cai, Tao Xin","doi":"10.59863/vhqo9263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/vhqo9263","url":null,"abstract":"[No abstract.]","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77001100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
去“构念”的测验效度验证 去“构念”的测验效度验证
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/eoel9922
S. Sireci
{"title":"去“构念”的测验效度验证","authors":"S. Sireci","doi":"10.59863/eoel9922","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/eoel9922","url":null,"abstract":"\"构念效度理论 (construct validity theory) 为教育和心理测验的“效度”提供了最全面的描述。“构念效度”一词最初由1954年的《心理测试与诊断技术的技术建议》引入 (American Psychological Association [APA], 1954)，随后由两名1954年委员会成员 Cronbach 和 Meehl (1955) 进行了阐释。构念效度理论对效度的理论描述产生了巨大影响，但没有在最近两版的《教育与心理测验标准》 (American Educational Research Association [AERA] et al., 1999, 2014) 中得到明确支持。在本文中，我将回溯有关构念效度理论对测验效度检验的重要性的讨论历史，并且识别构念效度理论的基本要素——这些要素对于有着特定用途的测验的效度验证至关重要。同时，我将提出一个侧重于测验使用，而非测验构念的效度验证框架。这个解构（译：“去构念”）的方法包含四步：（1）明确测验目的，（2）确认测验使用可能造成的消极后果，（3）将测验目的、可能的误用与 AERA et al. (2014) 的《教育与心理测验标准》中的五个效度证 据来源进行交叉比对，（4）优先考虑一些效度证据来源，以建立一个充足的、注重测验使用以及后果的效度论证。该去构念效度验证的目标是接受构念效度理论涉及的主要原则，利用这些原则发展一个心理测量学家、法院法官、决策者和一般公众都能理解的、连贯的、全面的效度论证，且与 AERA et al.(2014) 的《标准》保持一致。\"","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73280861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Intellectual History of Parametric Item Response Theory Models in the Twentieth Century 20世纪参数项目反应理论模型的思想史
Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.59863/gpml7603
D. Thissen, L. Steinberg
{"title":"An Intellectual History of Parametric Item Response Theory Models in the Twentieth Century","authors":"D. Thissen, L. Steinberg","doi":"10.59863/gpml7603","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.59863/gpml7603","url":null,"abstract":"The intellectual history of parametric item response theory (IRT) models is traced from ideas that originated with E.L. Thorndike, L.L. Thurstone, and Percival Symonds in the early twentieth century. Gradual formulation as a set of latent vari- able models occurred, culminating in publications by Paul Lazarsfeld and Federic Lord around 1950. IRT remained the province of theoreticians without practical ap- plication until the 1970s, when advances in computational technology made possible data analysis using the models. About the same time, the original normal ogive and simple logistic models were augmented with more complex models for multiple- choice and polytomous items. During the final decades of the twentieth century, and continuing into the twenty-first, IRT has become the dominant basis for large-scale educational assessment.","PeriodicalId":72586,"journal":{"name":"Chinese/English journal of educational measurement and evaluation","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83641942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信