3D printing in medicine最新文献

{"title":"Evaluating a novel 3D printed model for simulating Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ)","authors":"Matthias Kiesel, Inga Beyers, A. Kalisz, A. Wöckel, Sanja Löb, Tanja Schlaiß, Christine Wulff, J. Diessner","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00143-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00143-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65781237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dimensional variability characterization of additively manufactured lattice coupons","authors":"Kirstie Snodderly, Magdalene Fogarasi, Yutika Badhe, Ankit R. Parikh, Daniel Porter, Albert Burchi, L. Gilmour, M. D. Di Prima","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00141-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00141-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49251136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A 3D printed model of the female pelvis for practical education of gynecological pelvic examination","authors":"Matthias Kiesel, Inga Beyers, A. Kalisz, R. Joukhadar, A. Wöckel, S. Herbert, C. Curtaz, Christine Wulff","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00139-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00139-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44320062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Digital workflow for fabrication of bespoke facemask in burn rehabilitation with smartphone 3D scanner and desktop 3D printing: clinical case study.","authors":"Bushra Alhazmi,&nbsp;Feras Alshomer,&nbsp;Abdualziz Alazzam,&nbsp;Amany Shehabeldin,&nbsp;Obaid Almeshal,&nbsp;Deepak M Kalaskar","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00140-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s41205-022-00140-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present a digital workflow for the production of custom facial orthosis used for burn scar management using smartphone three-dimensional (3D) scanner and desktop 3D printing. 3D facial scan of a 48-year-old lady with facial burn scars was obtained. 3D modeling with open-source programs were used to create facemask then 3D printed using rigid polylactic acid (PLA) filament and semi-rigid thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Conventional facemask was used as a control. Each mask was worn for 7 days. Primary outcomes were level of comfort, and adherence to treatment. The conventional facemask was the most convenient followed by the TPU-facemask (mean comfort score of 9/10 and 8.7/10, respectively). Patient's compliance was high for both TPU and conventional masks, each was worn for at least 21 hours/day for 7 days. On the contrary, PLA-facemask was not well tolerated. The proposed digital workflow is simple, patient-friendly and can be adopted for resource-intensive healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069819/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41501397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical 3D modeling to guide pediatric cardiothoracic surgery and intervention using 3D printed anatomic models, computer aided design and virtual reality","authors":"Reena M. Ghosh, M. Jolley, C. Mascio, Jonathan M. Chen, Stephanie Fuller, J. Rome, E. Silvestro, K. Whitehead","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00137-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00137-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43113463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A robust, autonomous, volumetric quality assurance method for 3D printed porous scaffolds","authors":"Nicholas Y. Zhang, Srujan Singh, Stephen Z. Liu, W. Zbijewski, W. Grayson","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00135-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00135-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42816550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Optical scan and 3D printing guided radiation therapy – an application and provincial experience in cutaneous nasal carcinoma","authors":"Jui Chih Cheng, A. Dubey, J. Beck, D. Sasaki, A. Leylek, S. Rathod","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00136-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00136-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46562270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Interpretation of regulatory factors for 3D printing at hospitals and medical centers, or at the point of care.","authors":"Brian G Beitler,&nbsp;Paul F Abraham,&nbsp;Alyssa R Glennon,&nbsp;Steven M Tommasini,&nbsp;Lisa L Lattanza,&nbsp;Jonathan M Morris,&nbsp;Daniel H Wiznia","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00134-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00134-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3D printing is revolutionizing the medical device landscape through its ability to rapidly create patient-specific anatomic models, surgical instruments, and implants. Recent advances in 3D printing technology have allowed for the creation of point-of-care (PoC) 3D printing centers. These PoC centers blur the line between healthcare provider, medical center, and device manufacturer, creating regulatory ambiguity. The United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) currently regulates 3D printed devices through existing medical device regulations. However, the FDA is increasingly interested in developing guidelines and regulations specifically for PoC 3D printing due to its rapid adoption across the healthcare institutions. In this article, we review the regulatory framework that governs medical devices, discuss how PoC 3D printing falls within this framework, and describe a novel conceptual framework that the FDA has proposed. Finally, through analysis of the aforementioned regulations and discussions with industry medical 3D printing regulatory experts, we provide recommendations for PoC medical 3D printing best practices so that institutions are best positioned to utilize this revolutionary technology safely and effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8809025/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39577479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The impact of regulation, reimbursement, and research on the value of 3D printing and other 3D procedures in medicine.","authors":"Frank J Rybicki","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00132-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00132-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8805272/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39876116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display.","authors":"Julian Louis Muff, Tobias Heye, Florian Markus Thieringer, Philipp Brantner","doi":"10.1186/s41205-022-00133-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s41205-022-00133-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare different methods of three-dimensional representations, namely 3D-Print, Virtual Reality (VR)-Glasses and 3D-Display regarding the understanding of the pathology, accuracy of details, quality of the anatomical representation and technical operability and assessment of possible change in treatment in different disciplines and levels of professional experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with twenty physicians from the disciplines of cardiology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopedic surgery, and radiology between 2018 and 2020 at the University Hospital of Basel. They were all presented with three different three-dimensional clinical cases derived from CT data from their area of expertise, one case for each method. During this, the physicians were asked for their feedback written down on a pencil and paper questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerning the understanding of the pathology and quality of the anatomical representation, VR-Glasses were rated best in three out of four disciplines and two out of three levels of professional experience. Regarding the accuracy of details, 3D-Display was rated best in three out of four disciplines and all levels of professional experience. As to operability, 3D-Display was consistently rated best in all levels of professional experience and all disciplines. Possible change in treatment was reported using 3D-Print in 33%, VR-Glasses in 44%, and 3D-Display in 33% of participants. Physicians with a professional experience of more than ten years reported no change in treatment using any method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-Print, VR-Glasses, and 3D-Displays are very well accepted, and a relevant percentage of participants with less than ten years of professional work experience could imagine a possible change in treatment using any of these three-dimensional methods. Our findings challenge scientists, technicians, and physicians to further develop these methods to improve the three-dimensional understanding of pathologies and to add value to the education of young and inexperienced physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801110/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39747868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}