3D打印骨科外固定装置:系统综述。

IF 3.2 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hunter A O'Connor, Luke W Adams, Lisa N MacFadden, Nathan Wm Skelley
{"title":"3D打印骨科外固定装置:系统综述。","authors":"Hunter A O'Connor,&nbsp;Luke W Adams,&nbsp;Lisa N MacFadden,&nbsp;Nathan Wm Skelley","doi":"10.1186/s41205-023-00180-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External fixators are complex, expensive orthopaedic devices used to stabilize high-energy and complex fractures of the extremities. Although the technology has advanced dramatically over the last several decades, the mechanical goals for fracture stabilization of these devices have remained unchanged. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has the potential to advance the practice and access to external fixation devices in orthopaedics. This publication aims to systematically review and synthesize the current literature on 3D printed external fixation devices for managing orthopaedic trauma fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols were followed for this manuscript with minor exceptions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers screened the search results based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to 3D printing and external fixation of fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one mechanical testing study, two computational simulation studies, three feasibility studies, and three clinical case studies. Fixator designs and materials varied significantly between authors. Mechanical testing revealed similar strength to traditional metal external fixators. Across all clinical studies, five patients underwent definitive treatment with 3D printed external fixators. They all had satisfactory reduction and healing with no reported complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with highly variable external fixator designs and testing techniques. A small and limited number of studies in the scientific literature have analyzed the use of 3D printing in this area of orthopaedic surgery. 3D printed external fixation design advancements have yielded promising results in several small clinical case studies. However, additional studies on a larger scale with standardized testing and reporting techniques are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter A O'Connor,&nbsp;Luke W Adams,&nbsp;Lisa N MacFadden,&nbsp;Nathan Wm Skelley\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41205-023-00180-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External fixators are complex, expensive orthopaedic devices used to stabilize high-energy and complex fractures of the extremities. Although the technology has advanced dramatically over the last several decades, the mechanical goals for fracture stabilization of these devices have remained unchanged. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has the potential to advance the practice and access to external fixation devices in orthopaedics. This publication aims to systematically review and synthesize the current literature on 3D printed external fixation devices for managing orthopaedic trauma fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols were followed for this manuscript with minor exceptions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers screened the search results based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to 3D printing and external fixation of fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one mechanical testing study, two computational simulation studies, three feasibility studies, and three clinical case studies. Fixator designs and materials varied significantly between authors. Mechanical testing revealed similar strength to traditional metal external fixators. Across all clinical studies, five patients underwent definitive treatment with 3D printed external fixators. They all had satisfactory reduction and healing with no reported complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with highly variable external fixator designs and testing techniques. A small and limited number of studies in the scientific literature have analyzed the use of 3D printing in this area of orthopaedic surgery. 3D printed external fixation design advancements have yielded promising results in several small clinical case studies. However, additional studies on a larger scale with standardized testing and reporting techniques are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3D printing in medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10246364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3D printing in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00180-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-023-00180-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外固定架是一种复杂、昂贵的骨科设备,用于稳定四肢高能量和复杂骨折。尽管在过去的几十年里,这项技术取得了巨大的进步,但这些设备的断裂稳定的机械目标仍然没有改变。三维(3D)打印技术有潜力推进骨科外固定装置的实践和使用。本出版物旨在系统地回顾和综合目前关于3D打印外固定装置治疗骨科创伤骨折的文献。方法:本文遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)方案的首选报告项目,只有少数例外。系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Review、Google Scholar和Scopus在线数据库。两名独立审稿人根据与3D打印和骨折外固定相关的预定纳入和排除标准筛选搜索结果。结果:9项研究符合纳入标准。其中包括一项机械测试研究,两项计算模拟研究,三项可行性研究和三项临床病例研究。固定器的设计和材料因作者而异。机械测试结果显示与传统金属外固定架的强度相似。在所有临床研究中,5名患者接受了3D打印外固定架的最终治疗。所有患者复位和愈合均满意,无并发症报道。结论:目前关于该主题的文献是异质的,具有高度可变的外固定架设计和测试技术。在科学文献中,有一小部分有限的研究分析了3D打印在骨科手术领域的应用。3D打印外固定设计的进步已经在几个小型临床案例研究中产生了有希望的结果。但是,还需要进行更大规模的标准化测试和报告技术的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review.

3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review.

3D Printed Orthopaedic External Fixation Devices: A Systematic Review.

Background: External fixators are complex, expensive orthopaedic devices used to stabilize high-energy and complex fractures of the extremities. Although the technology has advanced dramatically over the last several decades, the mechanical goals for fracture stabilization of these devices have remained unchanged. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has the potential to advance the practice and access to external fixation devices in orthopaedics. This publication aims to systematically review and synthesize the current literature on 3D printed external fixation devices for managing orthopaedic trauma fractures.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols were followed for this manuscript with minor exceptions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Review, Google Scholar, and Scopus online databases were systematically searched. Two independent reviewers screened the search results based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to 3D printing and external fixation of fractures.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. These included one mechanical testing study, two computational simulation studies, three feasibility studies, and three clinical case studies. Fixator designs and materials varied significantly between authors. Mechanical testing revealed similar strength to traditional metal external fixators. Across all clinical studies, five patients underwent definitive treatment with 3D printed external fixators. They all had satisfactory reduction and healing with no reported complications.

Conclusions: The current literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with highly variable external fixator designs and testing techniques. A small and limited number of studies in the scientific literature have analyzed the use of 3D printing in this area of orthopaedic surgery. 3D printed external fixation design advancements have yielded promising results in several small clinical case studies. However, additional studies on a larger scale with standardized testing and reporting techniques are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信