Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences最新文献_第5页

Predictive strategies for the control of complex motor skills: recent insights into individual and joint actions 复杂运动技能控制的预测策略：对个人和联合行动的最新见解

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101519

Marta Russo , Antonella Maselli , Dagmar Sternad , Giovanni Pezzulo

{"title":"Predictive strategies for the control of complex motor skills: recent insights into individual and joint actions","authors":"Marta Russo , Antonella Maselli , Dagmar Sternad , Giovanni Pezzulo","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101519","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans perform exquisite sensorimotor skills, both individually and in teams, from athletes performing rhythmic gymnastics to everyday tasks like carrying a cup of coffee. The ‘predictive brain’ framework suggests that mastering these skills relies on predictive mechanisms, raising the question of how we deploy predictions for real-time control and coordination. This review highlights two research lines, showing that during the control of complex objects, people make the interaction with ‘tools’ predictable, and that, during dyadic coordination, people make their behavior predictable and legible for their partners. These studies demonstrate that to achieve sophisticated motor skills, we play ‘prediction tricks’: we select subspaces of predictable solutions and make sensorimotor interactions more predictable and legible by and for others. This synthesis underscores the critical role of predictability in optimizing control strategies across contexts. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for novel studies on the scope and limits of predictive mechanisms in motor control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101519"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143760926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Evolution of neural circuits in the origin of behavioral novelty 行为新颖性起源中的神经回路进化

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101520

Yun Ding

引用次数: 0

Behavioral illusions as obstacles to a science of purpose and how to get around them 行为错觉是目的科学和如何绕过它们的障碍

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101507

Richard S Marken

引用次数: 0

Measurement approaches in climate action research 气候行动研究中的测量方法

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101510

Florian Lange

{"title":"Measurement approaches in climate action research","authors":"Florian Lange","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101510","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Behavioral scientists across disciplines study the determinants of climate actions. They aim to describe, predict, explain, and change the behavioral properties (e.g. frequency, intensity, duration) of everyday resource consumption, climate-relevant investment decisions, or environmental activism behaviors. Accurate measurement of such properties is a critical prerequisite for a reliable science of climate actions. The present article reviews current measurement approaches while pointing to potential accuracy issues and ways to mitigate them. It illustrates the usefulness of observation-based measurement and argues that when relying on self-reports, researchers should take measures to ensure that participants’ self-observations can be accurate. In addition, behavioral paradigms are discussed as a means to study general principles underlying climate actions under experimentally controlled conditions. The review further distinguishes between the observation-based measurement of behavioral properties and the psychometric measurement of person properties and provides recommendations for the selection of measurement approaches contingent on researchers’ goals and interests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143697889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The social foundations of collective climate action 集体气候行动的社会基础

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101506

Nathaniel Geiger , John Fraser

{"title":"The social foundations of collective climate action","authors":"Nathaniel Geiger , John Fraser","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101506","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101506","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This interdisciplinary review explores intragroup and interpersonal precursors to collective climate action. First, we highlight structural perspectives into collective action, noting that efforts are moving beyond individual-level scientific literacy and instead situating climate literacy at the community level (i.e. community-based climate literacy). We highlight perspectives in community-based scientific literacy that conceptualize literacy as distributed throughout a group rather than solely held within individuals, and, grounded in theory on community-based climate literacy, we examine structural perspectives into how collective action can diffuse through social networks and into new communities. Next, we explore the social psychological literature on motivators of collective climate action, highlighting four interrelated intergroup and intrapersonal factors that recent research increasingly suggests are key to fostering collective action: (a) group identification, (b) empowerment to act, (c) social norms and influence, and (d) conversations. Collectively, this synthesis of recent research insights suggests promise for understanding and promoting collective climate action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101506"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143682052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Optimizing self-motion perception: a control theory perspective on vestibular–visual integration and adaptive mechanisms 优化自我运动知觉：前庭-视觉整合和自适应机制的控制理论视角

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101511

Fu Zeng , Rong Wang , Aihua Chen

引用次数: 0

Experimental approaches to study sensory disconnection in humans during sleep and anesthesia 研究人类在睡眠和麻醉状态下感觉断开的实验方法

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101505

Benedetta Cecconi , Vincent Bonhomme , Steven Laureys , Olivia Gosseries , Melanie Boly , Jitka Annen

{"title":"Experimental approaches to study sensory disconnection in humans during sleep and anesthesia","authors":"Benedetta Cecconi , Vincent Bonhomme , Steven Laureys , Olivia Gosseries , Melanie Boly , Jitka Annen","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We discuss evidence from anesthesia, sleep, and mind-wandering studies, demonstrating the frequent detachment of consciousness from external sensory inputs, resulting in states of sensory disconnection. The challenge of behaviorally distinguishing between conscious states with sensory perception (connected consciousness [CC]) and those without it (disconnected consciousness [DC]) is examined in light of current methods for assessing consciousness. We evaluate the effectiveness of objective measures and behavioral responsiveness versus subjective measures in differentiating between CC and DC states during sleep and anesthesia. We conclude that the most effective approach to study sensory disconnection in these states is to serially awaken participants during the same sleep stage or at similar anesthetic concentrations after sensory stimulation, while neuroimaging data is recorded. Upon awakening, subjective reports on consciousness and sensory perception are collected to identify CC and DC states. This methodology allows for a within-state examination of the neural signatures of sensory disconnection, minimizing biases from between-state comparisons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143681606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Priors and proprioceptive predictions 先验和本体感觉预测

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101509

Thomas Parr , Maxwell JD Ramstead , Karl Friston

{"title":"Priors and proprioceptive predictions","authors":"Thomas Parr , Maxwell JD Ramstead , Karl Friston","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101509","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101509","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review presents an approach to motor control inspired by the Equilibrium Point Hypothesis. The core idea is that, to realise a motor plan, one need only anticipate the proprioceptive consequences of that plan. Movement can then be executed through spinal and brainstem reflex arcs that correct for any deviations from these proprioceptive predictions. Seen in this light, motor commands are proprioceptive predictions. From a control-theoretic perspective, this implies that reflexes can be cast as closed feedback loops, the set points of which are determined by proprioceptive predictions. In what follows, we consider the key elements — in terms of active inference — that generate proprioceptive predictions. These include prior beliefs about motor trajectories, their temporal (autocorrelation) structure, and the confidence with which their sensory consequences can be predicted. For each element, we briefly review the neurobiology of the structures that might support the underlying computations. In short, we will see how corticospinal, cerebellar, and extrapyramidal systems might contribute to the prediction and realisation of a motor plan.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143681607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial overview: Subcortical cognition: redefining the neural substrates of higher cognition 编辑概述：皮层下认知：重新定义高级认知的神经基质

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101486

William Saban , Michael T Ullman , Karolina Janacsek

引用次数: 0

The brain that controls itself 控制自己的大脑

IF 4.9 2区心理学

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101499

Eli J Müller , Brandon R Munn , James M Shine

引用次数: 0