{"title":"What makes people want more impactful climate policy?","authors":"Wilhelm Hofmann , Sonja Grelle","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The dire challenge of climate change and the history of inadequate policy action by governments around the globe raise the critical question of how more impactful, structural climate solutions may be advanced. Here, we examine the role of citizen’s public policy acceptance as a key signal for the policymaking process with a focus on structural solutions. We briefly highlight the role of public policy support and key differences among policies low vs. high in regulatory depth. We then review work on the main predictors of the desire for more governmental intervention in climate policy domains and the acceptance of structural policy measures within an integrative policy acceptance framework. We highlight some open questions for future research, as well as implications for policymaking, such as how they may garner more support for impactful policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101479"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235215462400130X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The dire challenge of climate change and the history of inadequate policy action by governments around the globe raise the critical question of how more impactful, structural climate solutions may be advanced. Here, we examine the role of citizen’s public policy acceptance as a key signal for the policymaking process with a focus on structural solutions. We briefly highlight the role of public policy support and key differences among policies low vs. high in regulatory depth. We then review work on the main predictors of the desire for more governmental intervention in climate policy domains and the acceptance of structural policy measures within an integrative policy acceptance framework. We highlight some open questions for future research, as well as implications for policymaking, such as how they may garner more support for impactful policies.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.