发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Theoretical and philosophical perspectives on race and racism in education 教育中种族和种族主义的理论和哲学观点
IF 3.5 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580
Liz Jackson
{"title":"Theoretical and philosophical perspectives on race and racism in education","authors":"Liz Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Among topics in educational theory and philosophy, race and racism have been extensively developed in recent years. Despite public contestation about the continued relevance of race, most scholars in educational philosophy and theory regard a deepening understanding of race and racism as critical to enhancing equity in the future. This review considers how race and racism have been conceptualized and theorized within educational research to benefit youth and society. First, it gives a global picture about how race has been and is conceived in educational and other social theory. It links scholarship on race and racism to important global phenomena related to white supremacy, imperialism and colonialism, and multiculturalism. Then it considers contemporary developments in the field for understanding and conceptualizing race. In the course, it is demonstrated how definitions and conceptions change and shift over time and across locations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144749454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validity theory and validation of demographic self-report: a critical quantitative appraisal 人口学自我报告的效度理论与验证：一个关键的定量评估
IF 3.5 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577
Phillip A Boda
{"title":"Validity theory and validation of demographic self-report: a critical quantitative appraisal","authors":"Phillip A Boda","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in different approaches to critical quantitative statistics have been extensively used across various fields, with a wealth of empirical research illustrating applications and results. In education and other disciplines interested in disrupting White supremacy embodied across much of today’s policy and procedures, there is an increasing call to incorporate a diverse range of critical approaches to research methods. This pivoting aims to challenge the marginalization of subaltern ways of knowing, which has resulted in a tradition of reliance on (post-)positivist frameworks that limit the scope of research inference and validity. Critical psychometrics has become central in shaping our understanding of measurement, its accuracy, and the rationale behind approaches to code self-reported demographic categories as stable, fixed, and accurate estimates of oppression. This paper provides two mixed-methods survey study examples where these assumptions unsettle the notion that self-report demographics measure comparative indices of identity. Implications of this critical quantitative psychometric appraisal challenges the taken-for-granted nature of self-reported demographics; that is, these essentialized identity categories should be used to accurately and precisely compare differences between disability, race, class, gender, socioeconomic status, and educational background. With the validity theory behind this assumption challenged, this work provides a starting point, a stake in the ground, to pursue diverse methods to validate self-reports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101577"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144739319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Whose experiences are we capturing? A critical reflection on classroom observation measures 我们在捕捉谁的经历？课堂观察措施的批判性反思
IF 3.5 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101579
Kathleen Melhuish , Naneh Apkarian , Estrella Johnson
{"title":"Whose experiences are we capturing? A critical reflection on classroom observation measures","authors":"Kathleen Melhuish ,&nbsp;Naneh Apkarian ,&nbsp;Estrella Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101579","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101579","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mathematics classroom observation protocols are a prevalent way that researchers analyze classrooms for purposes such as identifying quality instruction and evaluating the impact of instructional interventions. These protocols serve to operationalize what counts as quality instruction. However, we have found both in our own scholarship and in the mathematics education field at large, the scholar point of view is emphasized with minimal critical reflection. We suggest that this preserves dominant ideologies that can serve to uphold whiteness in the classroom and allows for racial, gender, and cultural bias in tool use. We make a call for attention to QuantCrit tenants in the design and use of classroom observation protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144721618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addressing loneliness through AI: philosophical perspectives 通过人工智能解决孤独：哲学视角
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101576
Vahid Taebnia
{"title":"Addressing loneliness through AI: philosophical perspectives","authors":"Vahid Taebnia","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101576","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101576","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review critically examines some of the recent philosophical perspectives on the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) companionship in alleviating loneliness. By engaging with six recent studies on the subject, it identifies two primary frameworks for conceptualizing AI companionship: an anthropocentric perspective, which evaluates AI’s ability to provide meaningful companionship mainly from a human point of view, and a constructivist approach, which gives primacy to the dynamic evolution of human–AI interactions and the potential for AI to create new forms of meaningful relationships. Through an analysis of some of the critical elements to meaningful companionship — such as intersubjectivity, sentimentality, shared human experience, and selfless love — this review concludes by offering reflections on existing scholarship on AI companionship and potential future directions for this field of inquiry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101576"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144696904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptual control theory and the free energy principle: a comparison 知觉控制理论与自由能原理之比较
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101575
Richard Kennaway
{"title":"Perceptual control theory and the free energy principle: a comparison","authors":"Richard Kennaway","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101575","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101575","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do organisms pursue goals? This article compares two very different frameworks that address this question, perceptual control theory (PCT) and the free energy principle (FEP).</div><div>According to PCT, organisms have goals (reference values for certain variables) and sensors (of their actual values) and act to bring the sensed values towards the references. That is, they are organised as assemblages of control systems. FEP views the behaviour of organisms as resulting from minimising a quantity called free energy.</div><div>PCT makes specific proposals for the organisation of multiple control systems and for other aspects of goal-seeking behaviour, such as adaptation, learning, and memory. FEP claims that these phenomena and others emerge from the single principle of free energy minimisation.</div><div>PCT sharply distinguishes action from prediction: they are different sorts of things. FEP treats action as a particular case of prediction: organisms act not by commanding but by predicting their future states.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101575"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144696902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Events in the stream of behavior 行为流中的事件
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101581
Maverick E Smith , Jeffrey M Zacks , Zachariah M Reagh
{"title":"Events in the stream of behavior","authors":"Maverick E Smith ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Zacks ,&nbsp;Zachariah M Reagh","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101581","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101581","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The human mind constructs and updates models of events during comprehension. Event models are multidimensional, multitimescale, and structured. They enable prediction, shape memory formation, and facilitate action control. Event models may be updated incrementally by replacing feature information as it changes or globally by constructing an entirely new model; there is evidence for both mechanisms. Default mode network components, particularly medial prefrontal cortex, are thought to implement key event model functions, utilizing a temporally graded architecture in which regions with longer timescales perform more integration and abstraction. Two signatures of event model representations are phasic changes in overall activity at event boundaries and shifts in neural patterns at those boundaries. Current theories propose multiple control structures for event model updating, including monitoring the quality of event model–driven predictions. Event model updating during comprehension has important consequences not only for processing information in the moment but also for forming long-term memories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101581"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144696903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When between-person differences are not enough: The need for within-person perspectives on loneliness 当人与人之间的差异还不够时：对孤独的个人视角的需求
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101574
Marcus Mund , Linda Maurer , Bertus F. Jeronimus , Susanne Buecker
{"title":"When between-person differences are not enough: The need for within-person perspectives on loneliness","authors":"Marcus Mund ,&nbsp;Linda Maurer ,&nbsp;Bertus F. Jeronimus ,&nbsp;Susanne Buecker","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101574","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101574","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness arises when individuals perceive their social relationships as inadequate. Extensive research has linked loneliness to physical and mental health risks, as well as increased mortality. However, despite these well-documented consequences, several key aspects of loneliness remain surprisingly underexplored — largely due to the predominant reliance on between-person research designs. While these designs are invaluable for identifying interindividual differences in loneliness, they do not provide insight into its subjective nature or the specific circumstances under which loneliness arises and persists over time. To fully grasp the complexity of loneliness, we argue that research must move beyond traditional between-person approaches and more routinely integrate within-person perspectives. This shift will provide deeper insight into how loneliness unfolds within individuals, ultimately advancing our understanding of its dynamic nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144687149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A continuum of predictive control between motor and mental actions: language production as a test case 运动和心理活动之间的连续预测控制：语言产生作为一个测试案例
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101573
Elin Runnqvist , Christian A Kell
{"title":"A continuum of predictive control between motor and mental actions: language production as a test case","authors":"Elin Runnqvist ,&nbsp;Christian A Kell","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101573","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101573","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research traditions have studied aspects of control from their respective perspectives, separating motor and cognitive actions. This becomes particularly evident in the field of language and speech motor control in which linguistic language production models leave sensorimotor aspects underspecified and speech production models largely ignore the linguistic processing that provides a speech motor goal in the first place. It would be surprising if the brain organized control of speaking in such a dichotomous way. Here, we review and discuss conceptual proposals and empirical evidence supporting a hierarchical control architecture that allows for an embedded control of both abstract language as well as concrete speech. We propose a control scheme that could explain inner speech, speech planning, speech production, and speech perception in a single model. We propose concrete study designs that may disprove our proposal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101573"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144633430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future of work loneliness research 工作孤独感研究的未来
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101571
Sarah Wright
{"title":"The future of work loneliness research","authors":"Sarah Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101571","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101571","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review focuses on recent developments in work loneliness research, specifically examining studies published between 2023 and early 2025. In this essay, I focus on the conceptualisation of work loneliness, distinguishing it as a unique experience embedded within the context of work relationships and environments. I also highlight ongoing measurement issues, including the conflation of loneliness with social isolation, which complicates both theoretical clarity and the creation of targeted interventions. I specifically examine recent studies that explore loneliness within remote and hybrid work environments. The essay explores emerging evidence on leadership behaviour, with recent research suggesting that empathic, empowering, and supportive leadership is associated with reduced work loneliness. Finally, I identify promising but preliminary research into relational substitutes, such as digital relational agents and identification with one's work role, as potential buffers against loneliness when interpersonal relationships are lacking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Closed-loop perception: gaps between artificial intelligence and biology 闭环感知：人工智能和生物学之间的差距
IF 4.9 2区 心理学
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101572
Ehud Ahissar , Eldad Assa , Neomi Mizrachi , Guy Nelinger , Tchiya Ben-Joseph , Inbar Saraf-Sinik , Shachar Geiger , Alexander Rivkind
{"title":"Closed-loop perception: gaps between artificial intelligence and biology","authors":"Ehud Ahissar ,&nbsp;Eldad Assa ,&nbsp;Neomi Mizrachi ,&nbsp;Guy Nelinger ,&nbsp;Tchiya Ben-Joseph ,&nbsp;Inbar Saraf-Sinik ,&nbsp;Shachar Geiger ,&nbsp;Alexander Rivkind","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101572","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101572","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biological perception is achieved via brain–world interactions, predominantly implemented within closed-loop systems that integrate sensory inputs and the motor actions used to acquire them. In contrast, current developments of artificial perception primarily exploit open-loop configurations. Lacking this dynamic interplay, artificial intelligence (AI) remains limited in interpreting real-world data. Here, we review the fundamental gaps between biological perception, as revealed through neuroscience research, and artificial perception, as currently implemented in AI systems. We conclude with two major recommendations for advancing AI: adopting event-based processing and integrating closed-loop architectures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101572"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144605070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信