When between-person differences are not enough: The need for within-person perspectives on loneliness

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Marcus Mund , Linda Maurer , Bertus F. Jeronimus , Susanne Buecker
{"title":"When between-person differences are not enough: The need for within-person perspectives on loneliness","authors":"Marcus Mund ,&nbsp;Linda Maurer ,&nbsp;Bertus F. Jeronimus ,&nbsp;Susanne Buecker","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness arises when individuals perceive their social relationships as inadequate. Extensive research has linked loneliness to physical and mental health risks, as well as increased mortality. However, despite these well-documented consequences, several key aspects of loneliness remain surprisingly underexplored — largely due to the predominant reliance on between-person research designs. While these designs are invaluable for identifying interindividual differences in loneliness, they do not provide insight into its subjective nature or the specific circumstances under which loneliness arises and persists over time. To fully grasp the complexity of loneliness, we argue that research must move beyond traditional between-person approaches and more routinely integrate within-person perspectives. This shift will provide deeper insight into how loneliness unfolds within individuals, ultimately advancing our understanding of its dynamic nature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness arises when individuals perceive their social relationships as inadequate. Extensive research has linked loneliness to physical and mental health risks, as well as increased mortality. However, despite these well-documented consequences, several key aspects of loneliness remain surprisingly underexplored — largely due to the predominant reliance on between-person research designs. While these designs are invaluable for identifying interindividual differences in loneliness, they do not provide insight into its subjective nature or the specific circumstances under which loneliness arises and persists over time. To fully grasp the complexity of loneliness, we argue that research must move beyond traditional between-person approaches and more routinely integrate within-person perspectives. This shift will provide deeper insight into how loneliness unfolds within individuals, ultimately advancing our understanding of its dynamic nature.
当人与人之间的差异还不够时:对孤独的个人视角的需求
当个人认为自己的社会关系不足时,就会产生孤独感。广泛的研究将孤独与身心健康风险以及死亡率上升联系起来。然而,尽管有这些证据充分的后果,但令人惊讶的是,孤独的几个关键方面仍然没有得到充分的探索,这主要是由于主要依赖于人与人之间的研究设计。虽然这些设计对于识别孤独感的个体间差异是无价的,但它们并没有提供对其主观性质或孤独感产生和持续时间的具体情况的洞察。为了充分把握孤独的复杂性,我们认为研究必须超越传统的人与人之间的方法,更常规地整合人与人之间的视角。这一转变将让我们更深入地了解孤独是如何在个体内部展开的,最终促进我们对其动态本质的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信