Whose experiences are we capturing? A critical reflection on classroom observation measures

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kathleen Melhuish , Naneh Apkarian , Estrella Johnson
{"title":"Whose experiences are we capturing? A critical reflection on classroom observation measures","authors":"Kathleen Melhuish ,&nbsp;Naneh Apkarian ,&nbsp;Estrella Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mathematics classroom observation protocols are a prevalent way that researchers analyze classrooms for purposes such as identifying quality instruction and evaluating the impact of instructional interventions. These protocols serve to operationalize what counts as quality instruction. However, we have found both in our own scholarship and in the mathematics education field at large, the scholar point of view is emphasized with minimal critical reflection. We suggest that this preserves dominant ideologies that can serve to uphold whiteness in the classroom and allows for racial, gender, and cultural bias in tool use. We make a call for attention to QuantCrit tenants in the design and use of classroom observation protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625000981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mathematics classroom observation protocols are a prevalent way that researchers analyze classrooms for purposes such as identifying quality instruction and evaluating the impact of instructional interventions. These protocols serve to operationalize what counts as quality instruction. However, we have found both in our own scholarship and in the mathematics education field at large, the scholar point of view is emphasized with minimal critical reflection. We suggest that this preserves dominant ideologies that can serve to uphold whiteness in the classroom and allows for racial, gender, and cultural bias in tool use. We make a call for attention to QuantCrit tenants in the design and use of classroom observation protocols.
我们在捕捉谁的经历?课堂观察措施的批判性反思
数学课堂观察协议是研究人员分析课堂的一种普遍方法,用于识别教学质量和评估教学干预措施的影响。这些协议用于实现所谓的质量指导。然而,我们发现,无论是在我们自己的学术研究中,还是在整个数学教育领域,学者的观点都被强调得很少,很少有批判性的反思。我们认为,这保留了可以在课堂上维护白人的主导意识形态,并允许在工具使用中存在种族、性别和文化偏见。我们呼吁在设计和使用课堂观察协议时关注QuantCrit的租户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信