Journal of Gastric Cancer最新文献

{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial (KLASS-12).","authors":"Hyoung-Il Kim, Hoseok Seo, Hoon Hur, Chang Min Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Dong Jin Park, Yun-Suhk Suh, Oh Jeong, Sang-Yong Son, Mi Ran Jung, Young Suk Park, Dong-Wook Kim, Jeong Ho Song, Yoontaek Lee, Ji-Ho Park, Shin-Hoo Park, Sejin Lee, Seong-Ho Kong, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Jong Won Kim, Han Hong Lee","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e34","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e34","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This trial (KLASS-12) compares the efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (RPLG) versus conventional 5-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (CPLG) for early gastric cancer (EGC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma (T1N0M0) at 15 university hospitals in Korea. Participants underwent RPLG or CPLG with at least D1+ lymph node dissection. The primary aim of this study was to verify the non-inferiority of RPLG to CPLG in terms of postoperative 30-day complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2022 to October 2023, 348 patients were randomly assigned to the RPLG and CPLG groups, with 174 patients in each group. After applying the exclusion criteria, 164 and 166 patients from the RPLG and CPLG groups, respectively, were analyzed. Complication rates were 10.4% and 9.2% for the RPLG and CPLG groups, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, and 10.4% vs. 7.2% in the per-protocol (PP) population. The risk difference was 0.012 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.051 to 0.075) in the ITT population and 0.031 (95% CI, -0.030 to 0.093) in the PP population. These findings verified the non-inferiority of RPLG to CPLG, with a 10% margin. Additionally, the pain score on postoperative day 5 was significantly lower in the RPLG group (1.6% vs. 1.8%; P=0.028). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in the lymph node yield, conversion rate, or length of hospital stay. RPLG was not an independent risk factor for complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPLG is a feasible and safe alternative for patients with EGC, and its short-term outcomes are not inferior to those of CPLG.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006935.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"437-454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260794/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reply: Comments on \"The Impact of Different Types of Complications on Long-Term Survival After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer\".","authors":"Mi Ran Jung, Sung Eun Kim, Oh Jeong","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e31","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e31","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"407-408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patients' Preferences for Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study on Decision-Making in Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategies.","authors":"Tae-Han Kim, In-Ho Kim, Seung Joo Kang, Geum Jong Song, Mi Ran Jung, Hye Sook Han, Su Youn Nam, Seong-Ho Kong","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e35","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e35","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Decisions regarding gastric cancer treatment affect patient outcomes and quality of life (QOL); nonetheless, factors influencing patient preferences remain unclear. This study investigated the preferences for the extent of gastrectomy, minimally invasive surgery, and adjuvant therapy while identifying the key determinants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 240 respondents, including patients with gastric cancer and the general population, assessed their preferences for the extent of gastrectomy, surgical modality, adjuvant therapy, palliative systemic therapy, and endoscopic therapy. Correlations between demographic variables and treatment choices were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients prioritized expert recommendations for determining the extent of gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer and selecting the surgical modality, with recurrence risk and surgical complications being the primary considerations. In terms of adjuvant therapy, a 12-month oral regimen was preferred over a 6-month oral plus injection regimen, with survival benefit being the most valued factor. Conversely, QOL was a primary concern in palliative therapy. With respect to incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection, electrocauterization was the preferred approach, followed by surgical resection; local recurrence risk was assigned with the highest priority, followed by concerns regarding lymph node metastasis. Men and individuals living alone had a lower risk of recurrence and lymph node metastasis. Patients undergoing gastric cancer treatment preferred shorter procedures, whereas medical personnel emphasized surgical safety and efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demographic and clinical factors significantly influence patient preferences. Understanding these preferences is essential for shared decision-making and personalized oncological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"478-496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260799/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.","authors":"Yeojin Boo, Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has become popular owing to its proven technical feasibility and oncological safety compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Although intracorporeal (IC) esophagojejunostomy (EJ) is commonly performed, a standardized method remains undetermined. This study compared short-term outcomes of IC EJ using circular versus linear stapling techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 586 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive proximal or total gastrectomy between 2010 and 2021. Finally, 158 and 392 patients who underwent IC EJ anastomosis with circular and linear stapling, respectively, were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of complications did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.138). However, major complications occurred more frequently in the circular stapling group than in the linear stapling group (15.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.041). There was no significant intergroup difference in EJ-related anastomotic leakage (1.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.916). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the linear stapling group than in the circular stapling group (10.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001). Additionally, the pain score on postoperative day 1 was lower in the linear stapling group (3.48 vs. 3.09, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both linear and circular stapling can be used in IC EJ. However, linear stapling is a more suitable option because it has several advantages, including a reduced incidence of EJ-related stenosis and less postoperative pain attributable to differences in the length of the incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260796/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Erratum: Intraperitoneal Paclitaxel Combined with S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Phase I Study.","authors":"Dong-Wook Kim, Won Jun Seo, Sang Il Youn, Ye Seob Jee, You-Jin Jang, Jong-Han Kim","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e28","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e28","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This corrects the article on p. 418 in vol. 21, PMID: 35079443.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260788/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating the Synergistic Effects of Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer.","authors":"Jun Okui, Kengo Nagashima, Satoru Matsuda, Yasunori Sato, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Masashi Takeuchi, Kenro Hirata, Kai Tsugaru, Shun Yamamoto, Motoo Nomura, Takahiro Tsushima, Hiroya Takeuchi, Ken Kato, Yuko Kitagawa","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e33","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e33","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy combinations have been approved for the treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC), whether immunochemotherapy (ICT) offers advantages over the simple addition of individual monotherapies remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether ICT has a synergistic effect in patients with advanced GC/GEJC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Reconstructed individual patient data were electronically extracted from the Kaplan-Meier curves of 3 randomized controlled trials comparing pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-061, KEYNOTE-062, and KEYNOTE-859). The observed progression-free survival (PFS) curve for each monotherapy was used to estimate the simulated PFS curve expected under an independent drug action model. If the observed curve demonstrated significantly better PFS than the simulated curve, combined ICI and chemotherapy was determined to have a synergistic effect, implying a superior outcome compared to adding-component monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive scores of ≥1 (n=2,194), the 1-year and median PFS of the observed and simulated curves were 28.0% vs. 27.9% and 6.89 months vs. 6.88 months, respectively. The one-sample log-rank test revealed no significant differences between the observed and simulated curves (P=0.107).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed PFS with ICT was comparable to the predicted PFS based on the data for each monotherapy. Our findings do not provide direct evidence of synergistic effects, but they suggest that combining ICI and chemotherapy does not compromise efficacy. These results may support the continued clinical use of ICT in patients with advanced GC/GEJC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"455-465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260791/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Survey of Perioperative Practices in Gastric Cancer Surgery for Establishing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Across 10 Tertiary Hospitals in South Korea.","authors":"Ho-Jin Lee, Jeesun Kim, Bon-Wook Koo, Yun-Suhk Suh, Jung-Man Lee, Dong-Seok Han, Sang Hyun Hong, Han Hong Lee, Young Chul Yoo, Hyoung-Il Kim, Ji Yoon Rho, Hong Man Yoon, Ha-Yeon Kim, Hoon Hur, Hyae-Jin Kim, Chang In Choi, Boohwi Hong, Sang-Il Lee, Kibeom Park, Seung Wan Ryu, Do Joong Park","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e27","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e27","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify the current perioperative management practices for gastric cancer surgery in South Korea and develop a consensus-driven Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey was conducted with 20 principal investigators, comprising one gastric surgeon and one anesthesiologist each, from 10 tertiary hospitals in South Korea who participated in a planned multicenter RCT. The survey included 41 questions regarding ERAS implementation and department-specific perioperative management practices. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the findings were used to develop a consensus-driven ERAS protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 participants completed the survey. Most respondents estimated the overall compliance rate with ERAS protocols for gastric cancer surgery to be 30%-50%. A major barrier to ERAS implementation is limited personnel resources. The survey revealed significant variability in perioperative practices-particularly in postoperative oral feeding protocols and expected discharge dates-across institutions. Most institutions practice water fasting from midnight before surgery, and the adoption rate of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia is low. Based on these findings, an ERAS protocol was established through collaborative discussions to shorten perioperative fasting periods and implement multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed significant variability in the perioperative management of gastric cancer surgery in South Korea. A consensus-driven ERAS protocol was established to standardize care and promote functional recovery. Its feasibility and effectiveness should be evaluated in an upcoming multicenter RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"424-436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260792/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Critical Review of the Impact of Different Types of Complications on Long-Term Survival After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Addressing Methodological Gaps and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Priyadarshini Deb, Irfat Islam Eva, Muhammad Ali Muzammil","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e30","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e30","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"405-406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Erratum: Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Kenichi Ishizu, Tsutomu Hayashi, Rei Ogawa, Masashi Nishino, Ryota Sakon, Takeyuki Wada, Sho Otsuki, Yukinori Yamagata, Hitoshi Katai, Yoshiyuki Matsui, Takaki Yoshikawa","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e29","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e29","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This corrects the article on p. 280 in vol. 24, PMID: 38960887.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"520-521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260798/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Novel Digital Method for Accurate Endoscopic Size Measurement of Gastric Lesions: A Comparative Study With Visual and Forceps-Assisted Estimation.","authors":"Soyoung Yun, Bokyung Kim, Gihong Park, Ji Kon Ryu, Hyunsoo Chung","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e37","DOIUrl":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e37","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate measurement of the lesion size during endoscopy is crucial; however, it frequently relies on visual estimation, which is prone to errors. This study investigated these inaccuracies and introduced a novel depth-estimation algorithm (DEA) to evaluate its performance against conventional methods, visual estimation, and forceps-assisted estimation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nineteen endoscopists (6 experts, 13 novices) measured 15 artificial lesions (6-39 mm) within a 3-dimensional (3D)-printed stomach model using visual estimation (VE), forceps-assisted estimation (FE), and DEA. Measurement accuracy was evaluated using median percentage error (MdPE) and interquartile range (IQR). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the endoscopist's experience and lesion size, location, and shape for each measurement method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VE resulted in the highest MdPE at 33.33% (IQR, 17.24%-60.00%), while FE showed greater accuracy at 30.00% (IQR, 11.11%-48.72%; P<0.01). Unlike experts, novices exhibited no significant improvement in FE compared to VE (P=0.09). Conventional methods have demonstrated high error rates for polyp-shaped lesions and those located in the fundus, middle to high body, or the greater curvature. DEA achieved the highest accuracy, with an MdPE of 7.78% (IQR, 3.33%-16.67%), significantly outperforming both VE and FE (P<0.01) regardless of lesion characteristics, and showed consistent performance across endoscopist experience (P=0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the observed error patterns in VE, endoscopists should exercise caution when evaluating polyp-shaped lesions and those located in the proximal stomach and greater curvature. The DEA outperformed conventional methods, especially for novices. Its integration into endoscopic practice can enhance the precision of lesion size measurements, ultimately improving clinical decision-making and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"497-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260797/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144592946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}