胃癌食管空肠吻合术线性吻合术与圆形吻合术的短期疗效:治疗加权的逆概率分析。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yeojin Boo, Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han
{"title":"胃癌食管空肠吻合术线性吻合术与圆形吻合术的短期疗效:治疗加权的逆概率分析。","authors":"Yeojin Boo, Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has become popular owing to its proven technical feasibility and oncological safety compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Although intracorporeal (IC) esophagojejunostomy (EJ) is commonly performed, a standardized method remains undetermined. This study compared short-term outcomes of IC EJ using circular versus linear stapling techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 586 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive proximal or total gastrectomy between 2010 and 2021. Finally, 158 and 392 patients who underwent IC EJ anastomosis with circular and linear stapling, respectively, were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of complications did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.138). However, major complications occurred more frequently in the circular stapling group than in the linear stapling group (15.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.041). There was no significant intergroup difference in EJ-related anastomotic leakage (1.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.916). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the linear stapling group than in the circular stapling group (10.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001). Additionally, the pain score on postoperative day 1 was lower in the linear stapling group (3.48 vs. 3.09, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both linear and circular stapling can be used in IC EJ. However, linear stapling is a more suitable option because it has several advantages, including a reduced incidence of EJ-related stenosis and less postoperative pain attributable to differences in the length of the incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"25 3","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yeojin Boo, Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han\",\"doi\":\"10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has become popular owing to its proven technical feasibility and oncological safety compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Although intracorporeal (IC) esophagojejunostomy (EJ) is commonly performed, a standardized method remains undetermined. This study compared short-term outcomes of IC EJ using circular versus linear stapling techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 586 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive proximal or total gastrectomy between 2010 and 2021. Finally, 158 and 392 patients who underwent IC EJ anastomosis with circular and linear stapling, respectively, were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of complications did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.138). However, major complications occurred more frequently in the circular stapling group than in the linear stapling group (15.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.041). There was no significant intergroup difference in EJ-related anastomotic leakage (1.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.916). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the linear stapling group than in the circular stapling group (10.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001). Additionally, the pain score on postoperative day 1 was lower in the linear stapling group (3.48 vs. 3.09, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both linear and circular stapling can be used in IC EJ. However, linear stapling is a more suitable option because it has several advantages, including a reduced incidence of EJ-related stenosis and less postoperative pain attributable to differences in the length of the incision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"509-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12260796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e38","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与传统的开放式胃切除术相比,微创胃癌手术因其技术可行性和肿瘤安全性得到了广泛的应用。虽然通常采用体内(IC)食管空肠吻合术(EJ),但标准化的方法尚未确定。本研究比较了环形吻合器与线性吻合器的短期疗效。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了2010年至2021年间接受微创近端或全胃切除术的586例胃癌患者。最后,本研究分别纳入158例和392例采用环形吻合术和线性吻合术的IC EJ吻合患者。在使用治疗加权逆概率调整混杂变量后,比较两组的手术结果和并发症发生率。结果:两组患者并发症总数无显著差异(P=0.138)。然而,圆形吻合器组的主要并发症发生率高于直线吻合器组(15.2%比7.4%,P=0.041)。ejj相关性吻合口瘘发生率组间差异无统计学意义(1.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.916)。线性吻合器组吻合口狭窄发生率低于圆形吻合器组(10.8% vs. 0.5%)。结论:线性吻合器和圆形吻合器均可用于IC EJ。然而,线性吻合器是一种更合适的选择,因为它有几个优点,包括减少eji相关狭窄的发生率,减少由于切口长度不同而引起的术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis.

Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has become popular owing to its proven technical feasibility and oncological safety compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Although intracorporeal (IC) esophagojejunostomy (EJ) is commonly performed, a standardized method remains undetermined. This study compared short-term outcomes of IC EJ using circular versus linear stapling techniques.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively assessed 586 patients with gastric cancer who underwent minimally invasive proximal or total gastrectomy between 2010 and 2021. Finally, 158 and 392 patients who underwent IC EJ anastomosis with circular and linear stapling, respectively, were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates were compared between the 2 groups after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results: The total number of complications did not differ between the 2 groups (P=0.138). However, major complications occurred more frequently in the circular stapling group than in the linear stapling group (15.2% vs. 7.4%, P=0.041). There was no significant intergroup difference in EJ-related anastomotic leakage (1.9% vs. 2.1%, P=0.916). The incidence of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the linear stapling group than in the circular stapling group (10.8% vs. 0.5%, P<0.001). Additionally, the pain score on postoperative day 1 was lower in the linear stapling group (3.48 vs. 3.09, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Both linear and circular stapling can be used in IC EJ. However, linear stapling is a more suitable option because it has several advantages, including a reduced incidence of EJ-related stenosis and less postoperative pain attributable to differences in the length of the incision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gastric Cancer
Journal of Gastric Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastric Cancer (J Gastric Cancer) is an international peer-reviewed journal. Each issue carries high quality clinical and translational researches on gastric neoplasms. Editorial Board of J Gastric Cancer publishes original articles on pathophysiology, molecular oncology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gastric cancer as well as articles on dietary control and improving the quality of life for gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer includes case reports, review articles, how I do it articles, editorials, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信