{"title":"Management of rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome and polyposis syndromes","authors":"Jeongyoon Moon MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rectal cancer arising in hereditary cancer syndromes requires highly individualized, multidisciplinary management that extends well beyond the principles applicable to sporadic disease. In Lynch syndrome (LS), surgical decision-making should incorporate the evolving role of immunotherapy, including organ preservation, taking into account the patient's lifelong risk of metachronous colorectal and extracolonic malignancies. In polyposis syndromes, total proctocolectomy is the cornerstone of surgical management, with reconstructive decisions shaped by radiation history, desmoid tumor risk, fertility considerations, and baseline anorectal function. In both settings, the rarity of hereditary rectal cancer presentations underscores the importance of centralizing care at experienced hereditary cancer programs with dedicated multidisciplinary expertise. Several critical questions define the future research agenda. In LS, as the role of immunotherapy continues to expand, organ preservation may be feasible across a wider range of clinical stages. The optimal extent of surgery for LS-associated rectal cancer (proctectomy versus total proctocolectomy) remains debated, and increasingly granular germline genotyping may allow the extent of resection to be tailored to the individual patient's metachronous colon cancer risk. Equally important are dedicated quality of life and functional outcome data following immunotherapy, including effects on bowel, urinary, and sexual function, outcomes after salvage surgery, and comparative outcomes between nonoperative management and radical resection .[40] In polyposis syndromes, desmoid disease remains one of the least evidence-based areas of surgical management in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Randomized data are lacking to guide medical therapy selection, thresholds for operative intervention, and reconstructive strategies in the setting of established desmoid disease. Addressing these challenges will require large-scale, collaborative, registry-based research efforts with syndrome-specific outcome reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elissa Dabaghi MD, Michael Cruise MD, PhD, David Liska MD
{"title":"Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes: diagnosis, surveillance, and operative management for the surgeon","authors":"Elissa Dabaghi MD, Michael Cruise MD, PhD, David Liska MD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101188","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101188","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are rare autosomal dominant conditions characterized by multiple gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps and an elevated risk of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal malignancies. The three major HPS, including juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS), each have distinct genotypes, polyp distributions, histopathological features, and cancer risk profiles with direct implications for surveillance and operative management. This review provides a comprehensive, surgically focused overview of JPS, PJS, and PHTS, with an emphasis on genotype-phenotype correlations, endoscopic surveillance, and surgical decision-making. Lifelong endoscopic surveillance and polypectomy remain the primary approach for all three syndromes, with surgery reserved for endoscopically unmanageable polyposis, refractory symptoms, or malignancy. Surgical indications and operative approach vary by syndrome, with total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis favored for JPS, intraoperative enteroscopy and “clean sweep” technique playing a critical role in PJS, and individualized segmental or total colectomy guided by polyp distribution and histology in PHTS. Cascade testing of at-risk family members is critical to facilitate timely surveillance and appropriate intervention. Chemoprevention remains investigational across all three HPS, although emerging data on mTOR inhibitors and other targeted agents show promise. These syndromes are best managed at specialized hereditary colorectal cancer centers with multidisciplinary expertise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Serrated polyposis and the less common polyposis syndromes","authors":"Mary Smithson MD, Robert H. Hollis MD, MSPH","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101190","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101190","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While familial adenomatous polyposis is one of the most widely recognized adenomatous polyposis syndromes, there are several less common polyposis syndromes that healthcare providers may encounter in practice. We review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, cancer risk and clinical management for serrated polyposis syndrome, <em>MUTYH</em>-associated polyposis, colonic oligopolyposis of unknown etiology, in addition to emerging polyposis syndromes such as polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis, <em>NTHL1</em>-associated polyposis, <em>MSH3</em>-associated polyposis, and <em>GREM1</em>-associated polyposis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Chemoprevention and chemo-suppression in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes","authors":"Sara Keshavjee MD, Mohammad Ali Abbass MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Colorectal cancer occurs in a significant portion of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes, including Lynch syndrome (LS), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS). Given that endoscopic surveillance and treatment alone does not fully prevent CRC in these patients, chemoprevention strategies have been increasingly investigated as adjuncts to endoscopic and surgical management. The most extensively studied agents include aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which primarily act through inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes. Multiple trials have investigated these drugs in LS and FAP. Emerging strategies include immune checkpoint inhibitors and neoantigen peptide vaccines, which exploit the highly immunogenic tumors in LS, as well as mTOR inhibitors for PJS and PHTS, though human trial data for these medications remain limited. This review summarizes evidence for chemoprevention across hereditary cancer syndromes, highlighting key trials, both published and ongoing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Genetic risk assessment for hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis: updates and clinical implications","authors":"Maureen E. Mork, Julie Moskowitz, Jessica M. Long","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101178","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Identification of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) predisposition prompts important healthcare considerations for affected individuals and at-risk relatives. Approximately 5–10% of CRC cases are attributable to known hereditary syndromes, with higher prevalence among early-onset cases. Lynch syndrome remains the most common cause, while adenomatous and hamartomatous polyposis syndromes account for additional sources of hereditary CRC risk. Given overlapping phenotypes across syndromes, multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) is essential to establish accurate molecular diagnoses and guide risk stratification, surveillance, and risk-reduction strategies. This narrative review summarizes hereditary CRC and polyposis syndromes, current and emerging strategies for genetic testing, and evolving models of care delivery. Indications for genetic evaluation are outlined based on personal and family history, tumor molecular features, and polyp burden, along with consideration of universal genetic testing in CRC. Emerging diagnostic approaches, such as RNA analysis, assessment of constitutional <em>MLH1</em> hypermethylation, and evaluation for mosaicism, are introduced as potential options for improved diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained but suggestive clinical presentations. Interpretation of genetic test results is discussed with emphasis on the substantive impact of cascade testing in relatives. Finally, alternative genetic service delivery models, including point-of-care and mainstreaming approaches, are introduced as potential means of enhancing access and scalability of cancer genetics services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nikita Wadhwani MD, Philip S. Bauer MD, Matthew F. Kalady MD
{"title":"Desmoid disease in familial adenomatous polyposis","authors":"Nikita Wadhwani MD, Philip S. Bauer MD, Matthew F. Kalady MD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101174","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101174","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Desmoid tumors are clonal, locally aggressive fibroblastic neoplasms that lack metastatic potential but are a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). They occur in approximately 10–25% of individuals with FAP, typically developing within a few years after colectomy, and arise mainly from the small bowel mesentery. Integration of genotype, family history, and prior surgical exposure into structured risk assessment tools can inform the timing and extent of colorectal surgery, surveillance strategies, and earlier consideration of systemic therapy. Management is largely dictated by clinical behavior. Active surveillance is the preferred first-line strategy, except in tumors located in critical sites, associated with complications, or demonstrating aggressive progression during follow-up, in which case active treatment including systemic therapy and/or surgical intervention should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Timothy Yen, Ying Liu, Dimitrios N. Varvoglis, Swati G. Patel
{"title":"Extracolonic manifestations of Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis","authors":"Timothy Yen, Ying Liu, Dimitrios N. Varvoglis, Swati G. Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101175","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101175","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis are two hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes that have many extracolonic manifestations that may impact clinical and surgical management. We review the risks and management of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic extracolonic manifestations as they impact the care for the patients and operative approach for a colorectal surgeon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 3","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148861757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Fernandez MD, PhD, José Azevedo MD, Mahmood Al-Dhaheri MD, Nahir Queiro MD, Miguel Cunha MD, Hugo Domingos MD, Richard Heald MD, Amjad Parvaiz MD
{"title":"CHAPTER: Upfront TME in locally advanced rectal cancer","authors":"Laura Fernandez MD, PhD, José Azevedo MD, Mahmood Al-Dhaheri MD, Nahir Queiro MD, Miguel Cunha MD, Hugo Domingos MD, Richard Heald MD, Amjad Parvaiz MD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101171","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101171","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has shifted toward total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for most stage II and III tumors. While this approach offers potential oncological and organ-preservation benefits, its routine use may lead to overtreatment in selected patients. Individuals with tumors not threatening the mesorectal fascia may achieve excellent local control with upfront surgery and high-quality total mesorectal excision alone, with limited added value from radiotherapy. In addition, emerging biomarkers such as postoperative circulating tumor DNA may further refine systemic risk stratification.</div><div>This chapter examines the role of upfront surgery within a risk-adapted approach, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection based on imaging and clinical factors. Upfront surgery remains a relevant option in selected patients, supporting a more individualized strategy in rectal cancer management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 101171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148775935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Contemporary multimodal treatment of rectal cancer","authors":"Rodrigo Oliva Perez, Leonardo Ervolino Corbi, Guilherme Pagin São Julião, Bruna Borba Vailati, Fernanda Lopez Mazzucato Maloni, Angelita Habr-Gama","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101199","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101199","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rectal cancer management has evolved quite significantly over time. From the initial surgery-only approach, the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was included to address the local recurrence problem and ultimately led surgeons to avoid TME in patients who developed a complete clinical response. Advancements in MRI evaluation helped better stage patients and tailor their treatments. Progressively, chemotherapy was added to the neoadjuvant treatment in an effort to reduce distant recurrence: Total neoadjuvant therapy, which also led to higher complete response rates. Finally, immunotherapy showed promising results with excellent response in mismatch-repair deficient patients, adding yet another strategy in the multimodal treatment of the disease.</div><div>In the present contribution, we will attempt to provide the reader with available evidence to support contemporary management of rectal cancer using each one of the multimodality treatment alternatives (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy) separately or in combination with a particular focus on optimal sequencing, taking into consideration oncological outcomes but also organ-preservation outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 101199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148775940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Contemporary management of rectal cancer: Lateral node dissection during rectal cancer surgery","authors":"Tsuyoshi Konishi MD, PhD, Kentaro Ochiai MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.scrs.2026.101177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes remains one of the most debated aspects of rectal cancer surgery. Historically, Western practice relied on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision, whereas Japanese practice incorporated lateral lymph node dissection as a regional nodal procedure for advanced low rectal cancer. Contemporary evidence has narrowed this apparent East-West divide. Enlarged lateral nodes, particularly those measuring at least 7 mm in short-axis diameter on baseline magnetic resonance imaging, are associated with a clinically important risk of lateral local recurrence after chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision alone. Selective lateral node dissection can substantially reduce this risk. However, treatment response is not binary. Nodes that shrink after chemoradiotherapy or total neoadjuvant therapy may still contain viable tumor, and downsizing alone should not automatically preclude surgery. Baseline nodal morphology, post-treatment size, nodal anatomical compartment, primary tumor height, overall tumor biology, patient fitness, and operative risk should all inform multidisciplinary decision making. Total neoadjuvant therapy improves primary tumor response but does not reliably sterilize clinically suspicious lateral nodes. Therefore, baseline short-axis diameter of 7 mm remains a reasonable practical threshold, while lower primary tumors and nodes with malignant morphologic features warrant heightened concern. Technically, lateral node dissection should be performed as a structured, plane-based, nerve-sparing operation. Because case volume is low outside referral centers, cadaveric training, video-based education, proctorship, and multidisciplinary quality assurance are essential for safe dissemination. This review summarizes the evidence supporting selective lateral node dissection in the modern era and proposes a practical framework for patient selection and technical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"37 2","pages":"Article 101177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148775936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}