Ear and Hearing最新文献

{"title":"Barriers to Early Progress in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.","authors":"Mathieu Marx, Marie-Laurence Laborde, Carol Algans, Marjorie Tartayre, Chris J James","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001559","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients obtain varying levels of speech perception from their device. Adult CI users adapt quickly to their CI if they have no peripheral \"bottom-up\" or neurocognitive \"top-down\" limiting factors. Our objective here was to understand the influence of limiting factors on the progression of sentence understanding in quiet and in noise, initially and over time. We hypothesized that the presence of limiting factors, detected using a short test battery, would predictably influence sentence recognition with practical consequences. We aimed to validate the test battery by comparing the presence of limiting factors and the success criteria of >90% sentence understanding in quiet 1 month after activation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study was a single-clinic, cross-sectional, retrospective design incorporating 32 adult unilateral Nucleus CI users aged 27 to 90 years (mean = 70, SD = 13.5). Postoperative outcome was assessed through sentence recognition scores in quiet and in varying signal to noise ratios at 1 day, 1 to 2 months, and up to 2 years. Our clinic's standard test battery comprises physiological and neurocognitive measures. Physiological measures included electrically evoked compound action potentials for recovery function, spread of excitation, and polarity effect. To evaluate general cognitive function, inhibition, and phonological awareness, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening test, the Stroop Color-Word Test, and tests 3 and 4 of the French Assessment of Reading Skills in Adults over 16 years of age, respectively were performed. Physiological scores were considered abnormal, and therefore limiting, when total neural recovery periods and polarity effects, for both apical and basal electrode positions, were >1.65 SDs from the population mean. A spread of excitation of >6 electrode units was also considered limiting. For the neurocognitive tests, scores poorer than 1.65 SDs from published normal population means were considered limiting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 month, 13 out of 32 CI users scored ≥90% sentence recognition in quiet with no significant dependence on age. Subjects with no limiting peripheral or neurocognitive factors were 8.5 times more likely to achieve ≥90% score in quiet at 1 month after CI switch-on ( p = 0.010). In our sample, we detected 4 out of 32 cases with peripheral limiting factors that related to neural health or poor electrode-neural interface at both apical and basal positions. In contrast, neurocognitive limiting factors were identified in 14 out of 32 subjects. Early sentence recognition scores were predictive of long-term sentence recognition thresholds in noise such that limiting factors appeared to be of continuous influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both peripheral and neurocognitive processing factors affect early sentence recognition after CI activation. Peripheral limiting factors may have been detected le","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"98-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637580/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141918187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Resting-State Functional Connectivity Predicts Cochlear-Implant Speech Outcomes.","authors":"Jamal Esmaelpoor, Tommy Peng, Beth Jelfs, Darren Mao, Maureen J Shader, Colette M McKay","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001564","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants (CIs) have revolutionized hearing restoration for individuals with severe or profound hearing loss. However, a substantial and unexplained variability persists in CI outcomes, even when considering subject-specific factors such as age and the duration of deafness. In a pioneering study, we use resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy to predict speech-understanding outcomes before and after CI implantation. Our hypothesis centers on resting-state functional connectivity (FC) reflecting brain plasticity post-hearing loss and implantation, specifically targeting the average clustering coefficient in resting FC networks to capture variation among CI users.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Twenty-three CI candidates participated in this study. Resting-state functional near-infrared spectroscopy data were collected preimplantation and at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year postimplantation. Speech understanding performance was assessed using consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet and Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences in noise 1-year postimplantation. Resting-state FC networks were constructed using regularized partial correlation, and the average clustering coefficient was measured in the signed weighted networks as a predictive measure for implantation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings demonstrate a significant correlation between the average clustering coefficient in resting-state functional networks and speech understanding outcomes, both pre- and postimplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This approach uses an easily deployable resting-state functional brain imaging metric to predict speech-understanding outcomes in implant recipients. The results indicate that the average clustering coefficient, both pre- and postimplantation, correlates with speech understanding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":"46 1","pages":"128-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637576/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142839654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Influence of Asymmetric Hearing Loss on Peripheral and Central Auditory Processing Abilities in Patients With Vestibular Schwannoma.","authors":"Veronika Svobodová, Oliver Profant, Josef Syka, Diana Tóthová, Zbyněk Bureš","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001555","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Asymmetric or unilateral hearing loss (AHL) may cause irreversible changes in the processing of acoustic signals in the auditory system. We aim to provide a comprehensive view of the auditory processing abilities for subjects with acquired AHL, and to examine the influence of AHL on speech perception under difficult conditions, and on auditory temporal and intensity processing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We examined peripheral and central auditory functions for 25 subjects with AHL resulting from vestibular schwannoma, and compared them to those from 24 normal-hearing controls that were matched with the AHL subjects in mean age and hearing thresholds in the healthy ear. Besides the basic hearing threshold assessment, the tests comprised the detection of tones and gaps in a continuous noise, comprehension of speech in babble noise, binaural interactions, difference limen of intensity, and detection of frequency modulation. For the AHL subjects, the selected tests were performed separately for the healthy and diseased ear.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed that binaural speech comprehension, gap detection, and frequency modulation detection abilities were dominated by the healthy ear and were comparable for both groups. The AHL subjects were less sensitive to interaural delays, however, they exhibited a higher sensitivity to sound level, as indicated by lower difference limen of intensity and a higher sensitivity to interaural intensity difference. Correlations between the individual test scores indicated that speech comprehension by the AHL subjects was associated with different auditory processing mechanisms than for the control subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggest that AHL influences both peripheral and central auditory processing abilities and that speech comprehension under difficult conditions relies on different mechanisms for the AHL subjects than for normal-hearing controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"60-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hearing Loss and Annual Earnings Over a 20-Year Period: The HUNT Cohort Study.","authors":"Astrid Ytrehus Jørgensen, Bo Engdahl, Bernt Bratsberg, Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum, Howard J Hoffman, Lisa Aarhus","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001554","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001554","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The association between hearing loss and income has only been examined in cross-sectional studies. We aim to study annual increase in earnings over 20 years, comparing people with and without hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used data from a population-based hearing study in Norway (The Trøndelag Health Study, 1996-1998), including 14,825 persons (46.2% men, mean age at baseline 30.6 years, age range 20 to 40 years). Hearing loss was defined as the pure-tone average threshold of 0.5 to 4 kHz in the better hearing ear ≥20 dB HL (n = 230). Annual earnings were assessed from 1997 to 2017. Longitudinal analyses were performed with linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People without hearing loss at baseline (before age 40) had a greater annual increase in earnings over a 20-year follow-up period compared with people with hearing loss. For people with normal hearing, annual earnings over 20 years increased by 453 Euro (EUR) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 384 to 522) or 13.2% more per year than for people with hearing loss, adjusted for age and sex. The difference in annual earnings over 20 year was greater among women (462 EUR, 95% CI = 376 to 547) than men (424 EUR, 95% CI = 315 to 533), greater among younger than older adults, and greater among lower than higher educated persons. When including adjustment for education in the model, in addition to age and sex, the difference in annual earnings over 20 years between persons with and without hearing loss was reduced (337 EUR, 95% CI = 269 to 405).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from this large population-based study indicates that people with hearing loss experience lower long-term earnings growth compared with people with normal hearing. The findings highlight the need for increased interventions in the workplace for people with hearing loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637570/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141977315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Examining the Relationship Between Hearing Health Beliefs and Social Determinants of Health in Black Adults.","authors":"Charity T Lewis, Julia Toman, Victoria A Sanchez, Jaime Corvin, Michelle L Arnold","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001562","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hearing loss is a highly prevalent condition; however, it is widely under-treated, and Black Americans have been found to have significantly lower rates of hearing aid utilization than other ethnic/racial groups. In this exploratory study, we aimed to identify hearing health beliefs among Black adults, guided by the Health Belief Model, with social determinants of health, and examine individual differences in these perspectives.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Hearing Beliefs Questionnaire (HBQ) was administered online to measure constructs of the Health Belief Model among 200 Black adults aged 18 to 75 ( M = 39.14, SD = 14.24). Approximately 13% reported hearing difficulty. In addition, 11 social determinants of health questions were included. Participants were recruited from a university otolaryngology clinic and local Black congregations, meeting inclusion criteria of being 18 or older and Black/African American. Mean scores and SDs for HBQ subscales were calculated. Analysis included analysis of variance and t tests to explore relationships with demographic variables and social determinants of health. Multiple regression analyses predicted HBQ subscale scores from sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean HBQ subscale scores ranged from 3.88 (SD = 2.28) for Perceived Barriers to 6.76 (SD = 1.93) for Perceived Benefits. Positive correlations were observed between Perceived Severity, Perceived Benefits, and Perceived Self-Efficacy scores and participant educational attainment. Lower economic stability was correlated with poorer scores in Perceived Self-Efficacy, Perceived Severity, and Perceived Benefits. Black adults' willingness to purchase a hearing aid was heavily influenced by their Perceived Benefit, Perceived Severity, and Perceived Self-Efficacy scores, with lower scores correlating with unwillingness to purchase devices. Higher frequency of racism/discrimination and financial hardship correlated with increased Perceived Barriers scores for accessing hearing healthcare. In addition, hearing health beliefs between participants with self-reported hearing difficulty and those without trouble only exhibited differences in the Perceived Susceptibility subscale, with those experiencing hearing difficulty having higher scores in this subscale; no other distinctions were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Health Belief Model, used with social determinants of health, revealed associations, and variations, in the hearing health beliefs held by Black adults. The present investigation reveals heterogeneity within this group and pinpoints individuals at higher risk for untreated hearing loss, stemming from their negative perceptions about hearing healthcare. These beliefs are influenced by demographics and social determinants of health, underscoring areas ripe for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-Utility Analysis of Bilateral Cochlear Implants for Children With Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Taiwan.","authors":"Ting-Hsuen Lin, Pei-Hsuan Lin, Te-Yung Fang, Chen-Chi Wu, Pa-Chun Wang, Yu Ko","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001568","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cochlear implants are an option for children with sensorineural hearing loss who do not benefit from hearing aids. Although bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) has been shown to enhance hearing performance and quality of life, its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bilateral CI compared with bimodal hearing for children with sensorineural hearing loss in Taiwan from both the perspectives of patients and Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration (TNHIA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A four-state Markov model was utilized in the study, including \"use the first internal device,\" \"use the second internal device,\" \"use the third internal device,\" and \"death.\" Health utility values were obtained from a local survey of health professionals and then adjusted by a scale to reflect both the negative impact of aging on hearing and the time needed to develop the full benefit of treatment in the earliest years of life. The cost data were derived from a caregiver survey, hospital databases, clinical experts, and the TNHIA. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated over the lifetime horizon and presented as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of simultaneous bilateral CI, sequential bilateral CI, and bimodal hearing. In addition, one-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of uncertainty and the robustness of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case analysis showed that children with bilateral CI gained more QALYs while incurring more costs when compared with those with bimodal hearing. From the TNHIA perspective, compared with bimodal hearing, the ICER of simultaneous bilateral CI was New Taiwan Dollars 232,662 per QALY whereas from the patient perspective, the ICER was New Taiwan Dollars 1,006,965 per QALY. Moreover, simultaneous bilateral CI dominated sequential bilateral CI from both perspectives. Compared with bimodal hearing, the ICER of sequential bilateral CI did not exceed twice the gross domestic product per capita in Taiwan from either perspective. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the utility gain of bilateral CI compared with bimodal hearing was the most impactful parameter from both perspectives. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the base-case analysis results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings reveal that bilateral CI was cost-effective when using the threshold of one to three times the 2022 gross domestic product per capita in Taiwan from both the TNHIA and patient perspectives. Future research incorporating cost and effectiveness data from other dimensions is needed to help decision-makers assess the cost-effectiveness of bilateral CI more comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigation of Video Ocular Counter-Roll Findings According to Head and Body Tilt Positions in Healthy Subjects.","authors":"Ahsen Kartal Özcan, Sema Satici, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Mert Kiliç, Sare Çankaya, Zahra Polat","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001563","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A vestibulo-ocular reflex called the ocular counter-roll can be used to assess how well the otolith organs are functioning. The video ocular counter-roll (vOCR) test is a recent addition to the videonystagmography test battery that allows for video recording and quantitative ocular counter-roll analysis. The purpose of this study is to investigate potential discrepancies in vOCR measurements obtained from a 30° lateral head tilt in the roll plane versus measurements obtained from a 30° tilt of the head and body.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thirty otologically, and neurologically healthy subjects aged 18 to 30 (M = 23.32 years, SD = 2.66 years; 8 men, 22 women) participated in this study. Pure-tone audiometry, oculomotor tests, and vOCR evaluation were performed for all participants. The vOCR assessment was performed in 2 positions, 30° lateral head tilt, and 30° body tilt position. The degree of static vOCR eye position and vOCR asymmetry in both positions were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference between the vOCR findings obtained in the right and left 30° lateral head tilt ( p = 0.546) and body tilt ( p = 0.114). vOCR asymmetry was determined as median (interquartile range) 0.08 (0.07) in lateral head tilt position and 0.09 (0.06) in body tilt position. The degree of static vOCR (8.75° [1.91]) detected during body tilt was statistically greater than the static vOCR (6.62 [1.69]) detected during head tilt ( p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of ocular counter-roll asymmetry detected between head tilt and body tilt ( p = 0.918).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows a significant difference in the vOCR responses during head tilt and body tilt, a finding that should be considered during clinical evaluation of vestibular function. There was no significant asymmetry between the responses with either head or body tilt.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Preliminary Data Visualization Approach to Vestibulocochlear Diseases Based on Multiple Scalar Dimensions.","authors":"Marcello Cherchi","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001557","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For vestibulocochlear diseases, traditional clinical history-taking, and the terminology of widely taught nosologic taxonomy, have misleading implications that can lead to errors in diagnosis and therefore in treatment. In the interest of facilitating differential diagnosis while simultaneously recognizing that many of these diseases may not be as discrete as textbooks suggest, we propose a data visualization approach focusing on several continuous scalar dimensions in the domains of anatomy, physiology, and chronology. We illustrate the application of this approach to several categories of clinical presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Correlating Maximum Response With Residual Hearing.","authors":"Raphael R Andonie, Wilhelm Wimmer, Stephan Schraivogel, Georgios Mantokoudis, Marco Caversaccio, Stefan Weder","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001546","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly recognized as a biomarker for assessing inner ear function in cochlear implant patients. This study aimed to objectively determine intraoperative cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude patterns and correlate them with residual hearing in cochlear implant recipients, addressing the limitations in current ECochG analysis that often depends on subjective visual assessment and overlook the intracochlear measurement location.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this prospective study, we investigated intraoperative pure-tone ECochG following complete electrode insertion in 31 patients. We used our previously published objective analysis method to determine the maximum CM amplitude and the associated electrode position for each electrode array. Using computed tomography, we identified electrode placement and determined the corresponding tonotopic frequency using Greenwood's function. Based on this, we calculated the tonotopic shift, that is, the difference between the stimulation frequency and the estimated frequency of the electrode with the maximum CM amplitude. We evaluated the association between CM amplitude, tonotopic shift, and preoperative hearing thresholds using linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CM amplitudes showed high variance, with values ranging from -1.479 to 4.495 dBµV. We found a statistically significant negative correlation ( ) between maximum CM amplitudes and preoperative hearing thresholds. In addition, a significant association ( ) between the tonotopic shift and preoperative hearing thresholds was observed. Tonotopic shifts of the maximum CM amplitudes occurred predominantly toward the basal direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of objective signal analysis and the consideration of intracochlear measurement locations enhances the understanding of cochlear health and overcomes the obstacles of current ECochG analysis. We could show the link between intraoperative CM amplitudes, their spatial distributions, and preoperative hearing thresholds. Consequently, our findings enable automated analysis and bear the potential to enhance specificity of ECochG, reinforcing its role as an objective biomarker for cochlear health.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141621846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Auditory Steady-State Responses: Multiplexed Amplitude Modulation Frequencies to Reduce Recording Time.","authors":"Rien Sonck, Jonas Vanthornhout, Estelle Bonin, Tom Francart","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001552","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the efficiency of a multiplexed amplitude-modulated (AM) stimulus in eliciting auditory steady-state responses. The multiplexed AM stimulus was created by simultaneously modulating speech-shaped noise with three frequencies chosen to elicit different neural generators: 3.1, 40.1, and 102.1 Hz. For comparison, a single AM stimulus was created for each of these frequencies, resulting in three single AM conditions and one multiplex AM condition.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Twenty-two bilaterally normal-hearing participants (18 females) listened for 8 minutes to each type of stimuli. The analysis compared the signal to noise ratios (SNRs) and amplitudes of the evoked responses to the single and multiplexed conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that the SNRs elicited by single AM conditions were, on average, 1.61 dB higher than those evoked by the multiplexed AM condition ( p < 0.05). The single conditions consistently produced a significantly higher SNR when examining various stimulus durations ranging from 1 to 8 minutes. Despite these SNR differences, the frequency spectrum was very similar across and within subjects. In addition, the sensor space patterns across the scalp demonstrated similar trends between the single and multiplexed stimuli for both SNR and amplitudes. Both the single and multiplexed conditions evoked significant auditory steady-state responses within subjects. On average, the multiplexed AM stimulus took 31 minutes for the lower bound of the 95% prediction interval to cross the significance threshold across all three frequencies. In contrast, the single AM stimuli took 45 minutes and 42 seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show that the multiplexed AM stimulus is a promising method to reduce the recording time when simultaneously obtaining information from various neural generators.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}