慢性药物滥用对听觉和前庭系统的影响:初步发现。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Amanda Chiao, Michelle L Hughes, Sarah Rogoz, Priya Karimuddanahalli Premkumar, Delaney Thomas
{"title":"慢性药物滥用对听觉和前庭系统的影响:初步发现。","authors":"Amanda Chiao, Michelle L Hughes, Sarah Rogoz, Priya Karimuddanahalli Premkumar, Delaney Thomas","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accumulating reports suggest that substance use disorders (SUDs) potentially lead to hearing and/or vestibular loss, particularly when overdose is involved. However, the existing literature is weak, consisting of case reports or small sample studies and that did not comprehensively evaluate both the auditory and vestibular systems. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of chronic substance misuse on behavioral and physiological auditory and vestibular outcomes in adults with substance misuse histories (SUD group) as compared with an age- and sex-matched control group without substance misuse histories. We hypothesized that chronic substance misuse would negatively affect the auditory system, similar to known ototoxic medications, resulting in high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, and the vestibular system, similar to acute effects of central-mediating medications, resulting in central abnormalities and imbalance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were analyzed for 60 adults with a substance misuse history (mean age, 42.2; range, 20 to 58 years) and 20 adults without (mean age, 37.2; range, 21 to 56 years). Outcome measures included responses on a health and substance-use questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening, tympanometry, standard and extended high-frequency (EHF) pure-tone air-conduction thresholds, standard and EHF distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), speech recognition in noise, oculomotor function, horizontal canal video head impulse test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and clinical dynamic visual acuity and standing balance tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants in the SUD group reported histories of polysubstance misuse. The SUD group had significantly poorer Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening scores than the control group. There was no significant difference between groups for the presence of middle-ear status. Although most thresholds were within the normal range, mean audiometric thresholds were significantly poorer for both the standard and EHF ranges for the SUD group compared with the control group. These patterns held even after adjusting for smoking and noise exposure. Distortion product otoacoustic emission, ABR wave III, and ABR wave V amplitudes were significantly smaller for the SUD group than the control group, with no significant differences between groups for ABR waves III and V latencies, which suggests elevated thresholds from a cochlear origin. Mean speech recognition in noise was not significantly different between groups. There were statistically significant differences or associations between groups for oculomotor function and standing balance. Participants in the SUD group were significantly more likely to have abnormal oculomotor function and impaired tandem stance, even after adjusting for head trauma history. There was an effect of group on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitudes; however, electromyography normalization could not be performed. There was no significant group effect on other peripheral vestibular measures, including video head impulse test gain and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, and dynamic visual acuity, suggesting no significant impact on vestibular nerve function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary findings suggest negative impacts to hearing and vestibular function in people with chronic substance misuse histories. The auditory results do not align with classic ototoxicity effects, although further investigation is warranted in this area; the vestibular results are consistent with central medication effects, and substance misuse has differential influences on auditory and vestibular function. Results potentially warrant diagnostic monitoring for people with SUDs to reduce their communication barriers and fall risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Chronic Substance Misuse on the Auditory and Vestibular Systems: Preliminary Findings.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Chiao, Michelle L Hughes, Sarah Rogoz, Priya Karimuddanahalli Premkumar, Delaney Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accumulating reports suggest that substance use disorders (SUDs) potentially lead to hearing and/or vestibular loss, particularly when overdose is involved. However, the existing literature is weak, consisting of case reports or small sample studies and that did not comprehensively evaluate both the auditory and vestibular systems. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of chronic substance misuse on behavioral and physiological auditory and vestibular outcomes in adults with substance misuse histories (SUD group) as compared with an age- and sex-matched control group without substance misuse histories. We hypothesized that chronic substance misuse would negatively affect the auditory system, similar to known ototoxic medications, resulting in high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, and the vestibular system, similar to acute effects of central-mediating medications, resulting in central abnormalities and imbalance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data were analyzed for 60 adults with a substance misuse history (mean age, 42.2; range, 20 to 58 years) and 20 adults without (mean age, 37.2; range, 21 to 56 years). Outcome measures included responses on a health and substance-use questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening, tympanometry, standard and extended high-frequency (EHF) pure-tone air-conduction thresholds, standard and EHF distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), speech recognition in noise, oculomotor function, horizontal canal video head impulse test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and clinical dynamic visual acuity and standing balance tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants in the SUD group reported histories of polysubstance misuse. The SUD group had significantly poorer Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening scores than the control group. There was no significant difference between groups for the presence of middle-ear status. Although most thresholds were within the normal range, mean audiometric thresholds were significantly poorer for both the standard and EHF ranges for the SUD group compared with the control group. These patterns held even after adjusting for smoking and noise exposure. Distortion product otoacoustic emission, ABR wave III, and ABR wave V amplitudes were significantly smaller for the SUD group than the control group, with no significant differences between groups for ABR waves III and V latencies, which suggests elevated thresholds from a cochlear origin. Mean speech recognition in noise was not significantly different between groups. There were statistically significant differences or associations between groups for oculomotor function and standing balance. Participants in the SUD group were significantly more likely to have abnormal oculomotor function and impaired tandem stance, even after adjusting for head trauma history. There was an effect of group on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitudes; however, electromyography normalization could not be performed. There was no significant group effect on other peripheral vestibular measures, including video head impulse test gain and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, and dynamic visual acuity, suggesting no significant impact on vestibular nerve function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary findings suggest negative impacts to hearing and vestibular function in people with chronic substance misuse histories. The auditory results do not align with classic ototoxicity effects, although further investigation is warranted in this area; the vestibular results are consistent with central medication effects, and substance misuse has differential influences on auditory and vestibular function. Results potentially warrant diagnostic monitoring for people with SUDs to reduce their communication barriers and fall risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ear and Hearing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:越来越多的报告表明,物质使用障碍(sud)可能导致听力和/或前庭功能丧失,特别是当过量使用时。然而,现有的文献是薄弱的,包括病例报告或小样本研究,并没有全面评估听觉和前庭系统。本研究的目的是确定慢性药物滥用对有药物滥用史的成年人(SUD组)的行为和生理听觉和前庭结果的影响,并与年龄和性别匹配的无药物滥用史的对照组进行比较。我们假设慢性药物滥用会对听觉系统产生负面影响,类似于已知的耳毒性药物,导致高频感音神经性听力损失,对前庭系统产生负面影响,类似于中枢介导药物的急性影响,导致中枢异常和失衡。设计:对60名有药物滥用史的成年人(平均年龄42.2岁;范围:20 - 58岁)和20名成人(平均年龄37.2岁;范围:21至56年)。结果测量包括对健康和物质使用问卷的反应、蒙特利尔认知评估筛查、鼓室测量、标准和扩展高频(EHF)纯音空气传导阈值、标准和EHF失真产物耳声发射、点击诱发听觉脑干反应(ABRs)、噪音中的语音识别、动眼肌功能、水平管视频头脉冲试验、颈和眼前庭诱发肌源电位、临床动态视力和站立平衡测试。结果:大多数SUD组的参与者报告了多药物滥用史。SUD组蒙特利尔认知评估筛查得分明显低于对照组。中耳状态的存在在两组之间没有显著差异。虽然大多数阈值在正常范围内,但与对照组相比,SUD组的标准和EHF范围的平均听力学阈值明显较差。即使在调整吸烟和噪音暴露后,这些模式仍然存在。畸变产物耳声发射、ABR波III和ABR波V振幅在SUD组明显小于对照组,ABR波III和ABR波V潜伏期组间无显著差异,提示耳蜗源性阈值升高。噪声环境下的平均语音识别率组间差异无统计学意义。在动眼肌功能和站立平衡方面,组间存在统计学上的显著差异或相关性。甚至在调整了头部创伤史后,SUD组的参与者更有可能出现异常的动眼肌功能和受损的串联姿势。实验组对颈前庭诱发肌电位振幅有影响;然而,肌电图正常化无法进行。其他前庭外周测量,包括视频头脉冲测试增益和眼前庭诱发肌原电位,以及动态视力均无显著影响,表明对前庭神经功能无显著影响。结论:我们的初步研究结果表明,慢性药物滥用史对听力和前庭功能有负面影响。听觉结果与经典耳毒性效应不一致,尽管在这一领域需要进一步研究;前庭功能结果与中枢药物作用一致,药物滥用对听觉和前庭功能有不同的影响。结果可能需要对患有sud的人进行诊断监测,以减少他们的沟通障碍和跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Chronic Substance Misuse on the Auditory and Vestibular Systems: Preliminary Findings.

Objectives: Accumulating reports suggest that substance use disorders (SUDs) potentially lead to hearing and/or vestibular loss, particularly when overdose is involved. However, the existing literature is weak, consisting of case reports or small sample studies and that did not comprehensively evaluate both the auditory and vestibular systems. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of chronic substance misuse on behavioral and physiological auditory and vestibular outcomes in adults with substance misuse histories (SUD group) as compared with an age- and sex-matched control group without substance misuse histories. We hypothesized that chronic substance misuse would negatively affect the auditory system, similar to known ototoxic medications, resulting in high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, and the vestibular system, similar to acute effects of central-mediating medications, resulting in central abnormalities and imbalance.

Design: Data were analyzed for 60 adults with a substance misuse history (mean age, 42.2; range, 20 to 58 years) and 20 adults without (mean age, 37.2; range, 21 to 56 years). Outcome measures included responses on a health and substance-use questionnaire, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening, tympanometry, standard and extended high-frequency (EHF) pure-tone air-conduction thresholds, standard and EHF distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), speech recognition in noise, oculomotor function, horizontal canal video head impulse test, cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and clinical dynamic visual acuity and standing balance tests.

Results: Most participants in the SUD group reported histories of polysubstance misuse. The SUD group had significantly poorer Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening scores than the control group. There was no significant difference between groups for the presence of middle-ear status. Although most thresholds were within the normal range, mean audiometric thresholds were significantly poorer for both the standard and EHF ranges for the SUD group compared with the control group. These patterns held even after adjusting for smoking and noise exposure. Distortion product otoacoustic emission, ABR wave III, and ABR wave V amplitudes were significantly smaller for the SUD group than the control group, with no significant differences between groups for ABR waves III and V latencies, which suggests elevated thresholds from a cochlear origin. Mean speech recognition in noise was not significantly different between groups. There were statistically significant differences or associations between groups for oculomotor function and standing balance. Participants in the SUD group were significantly more likely to have abnormal oculomotor function and impaired tandem stance, even after adjusting for head trauma history. There was an effect of group on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential amplitudes; however, electromyography normalization could not be performed. There was no significant group effect on other peripheral vestibular measures, including video head impulse test gain and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential, and dynamic visual acuity, suggesting no significant impact on vestibular nerve function.

Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest negative impacts to hearing and vestibular function in people with chronic substance misuse histories. The auditory results do not align with classic ototoxicity effects, although further investigation is warranted in this area; the vestibular results are consistent with central medication effects, and substance misuse has differential influences on auditory and vestibular function. Results potentially warrant diagnostic monitoring for people with SUDs to reduce their communication barriers and fall risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信