The WHAM Study: Socio-Emotional Well-being Effects of Hearing Aid Use and Mediation Through Improved Hearing Ability.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Lotte Alessandra Jansen, Marieke F van Wier, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Cas Smits, Sophia E Kramer
{"title":"The WHAM Study: Socio-Emotional Well-being Effects of Hearing Aid Use and Mediation Through Improved Hearing Ability.","authors":"Lotte Alessandra Jansen, Marieke F van Wier, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Cas Smits, Sophia E Kramer","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hearing impairment can negatively impact socio-emotional well-being. While hearing aids (HA) may improve hearing ability, communication, social participation, and emotional well-being, longitudinal studies are scarce and evidence quality is low. This longitudinal study examines the associations between (research question [RQ] 1) HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being, mediation by self-perceived hearing disability, and differences between subgroups, (RQ2) frequency of HA use (daily number of hours) and socio-emotional well-being, and (RQ3) duration of HA use (years of use) and socio-emotional well-being.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data from October 2006 to January 2024 from the Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing were used for this study. Every 5 yrs, participants were invited to complete an online digits-in-noise hearing test and survey, which included variables on HA use, psychosocial health, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and self-perceived hearing disability. For RQs 1 and 2, cumulative data from three 5-yr intervals (baseline [T0] to 5-yr follow-up [T1], T1-T2, and T2-T3) was compiled, based on eligibility for a HA at the beginning of the studied time interval but not using it at that time and either reporting HA use (HA uptake) or no HA use (no HA uptake) at follow-up and frequency of use at follow-up. Differences between those who adopted a HA versus those who did not were examined while controlling for pre-(non)uptake socio-emotional outcomes. After applying exclusion criteria, the final samples included n = 281 unique participants for RQ1 and n = 280 for RQ2. For RQ3, participants with 5, 10, or 15 yrs of HA use were identified and analyzed to assess the impact of long-term use, with n = 180 unique participants in the final dataset. Outcomes assessed for each RQ were depression, anxiety, distress, somatization, social loneliness, emotional loneliness, and total loneliness. Gamma regression models with generalized estimating equations were performed to analyze all RQs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 87% of participants were ≤65 yrs of age at T0. Among individuals without tinnitus, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower depression scores (p < 0.05). Among those aged >65 yrs, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower total loneliness scores. No significant associations were found between HA uptake and anxiety, somatization, distress, and emotional loneliness. Self-perceived hearing disability did not mediate the relationship between HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being outcomes. No significant associations between the duration of HA use and socio-emotional well-being outcomes were found. Frequency of HA use was not significantly associated with any outcome except somatization, where using a HA for 1 to 4 hrs per day was significantly associated with lower somatization scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This longitudinal study contributes valuable evidence to the growing body of research on the psychosocial benefits of HAs, highlighting both the potential and the limitations of device use in improving well-being. Results suggest that audiologists might consider integrating psychosocial support as part of a comprehensive treatment approach beyond simply recommending HA adoption or increased usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Hearing impairment can negatively impact socio-emotional well-being. While hearing aids (HA) may improve hearing ability, communication, social participation, and emotional well-being, longitudinal studies are scarce and evidence quality is low. This longitudinal study examines the associations between (research question [RQ] 1) HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being, mediation by self-perceived hearing disability, and differences between subgroups, (RQ2) frequency of HA use (daily number of hours) and socio-emotional well-being, and (RQ3) duration of HA use (years of use) and socio-emotional well-being.

Design: Data from October 2006 to January 2024 from the Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing were used for this study. Every 5 yrs, participants were invited to complete an online digits-in-noise hearing test and survey, which included variables on HA use, psychosocial health, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and self-perceived hearing disability. For RQs 1 and 2, cumulative data from three 5-yr intervals (baseline [T0] to 5-yr follow-up [T1], T1-T2, and T2-T3) was compiled, based on eligibility for a HA at the beginning of the studied time interval but not using it at that time and either reporting HA use (HA uptake) or no HA use (no HA uptake) at follow-up and frequency of use at follow-up. Differences between those who adopted a HA versus those who did not were examined while controlling for pre-(non)uptake socio-emotional outcomes. After applying exclusion criteria, the final samples included n = 281 unique participants for RQ1 and n = 280 for RQ2. For RQ3, participants with 5, 10, or 15 yrs of HA use were identified and analyzed to assess the impact of long-term use, with n = 180 unique participants in the final dataset. Outcomes assessed for each RQ were depression, anxiety, distress, somatization, social loneliness, emotional loneliness, and total loneliness. Gamma regression models with generalized estimating equations were performed to analyze all RQs.

Results: Approximately 87% of participants were ≤65 yrs of age at T0. Among individuals without tinnitus, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower depression scores (p < 0.05). Among those aged >65 yrs, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower total loneliness scores. No significant associations were found between HA uptake and anxiety, somatization, distress, and emotional loneliness. Self-perceived hearing disability did not mediate the relationship between HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being outcomes. No significant associations between the duration of HA use and socio-emotional well-being outcomes were found. Frequency of HA use was not significantly associated with any outcome except somatization, where using a HA for 1 to 4 hrs per day was significantly associated with lower somatization scores.

Conclusions: This longitudinal study contributes valuable evidence to the growing body of research on the psychosocial benefits of HAs, highlighting both the potential and the limitations of device use in improving well-being. Results suggest that audiologists might consider integrating psychosocial support as part of a comprehensive treatment approach beyond simply recommending HA adoption or increased usage.

WHAM研究:助听器使用对社会情绪幸福感的影响及其通过听力能力改善的调节作用。
目的:听力障碍会对社会情感健康产生负面影响。虽然助听器(HA)可以改善听力、沟通、社会参与和情绪健康,但纵向研究很少,证据质量低。本纵向研究考察了(研究问题[RQ] 1) HA摄取与社会情绪健康之间的关系,自我感知的听力障碍的中介,以及亚组之间的差异,(RQ2) HA使用频率(每天使用小时数)和社会情绪健康,(RQ3) HA使用持续时间(使用年)和社会情绪健康。设计:本研究使用了2006年10月至2024年1月荷兰听力纵向研究的数据。每5年,参与者被邀请完成一项在线数字噪音听力测试和调查,其中包括HA使用、社会心理健康、耳鸣、听觉亢进和自我感觉听力障碍等变量。对于RQs 1和RQs 2,根据在研究时间间隔开始时获得HA但当时未使用HA的资格,以及在随访时报告HA使用(HA摄取)或未使用HA (HA摄取)以及随访时使用HA的频率,汇编了三个5年间隔(基线[T0]至5年随访[T1], T1- t2和T2-T3)的累积数据。在控制前(非)摄取社会情绪结果的同时,研究了采用HA与未采用HA的人之间的差异。应用排除标准后,最终样本包括RQ1的n = 281名独特参与者,RQ2的n = 280名。对于RQ3,确定并分析了使用HA 5年、10年或15年的参与者,以评估长期使用HA的影响,最终数据集中有n = 180个独特的参与者。每个RQ评估的结果是抑郁、焦虑、痛苦、躯体化、社交孤独、情感孤独和完全孤独。采用广义估计方程的伽玛回归模型对所有RQs进行分析。结果:大约87%的参与者在0岁时年龄≤65岁。在没有耳鸣的个体中,HA摄取与抑郁评分降低显著相关(p < 0.05)。在年龄在65岁之间的人群中,HA摄取与总孤独感得分较低显著相关。羟基磷灰石摄取与焦虑、躯体化、痛苦和情感孤独之间没有显著的关联。自我认知的听力障碍并没有调节HA摄取和社会情绪健康结果之间的关系。在HA使用的持续时间和社会情绪健康结果之间没有发现显著的关联。除躯体化外,使用HA的频率与任何结果均无显著相关性,其中每天使用HA 1至4小时与较低的躯体化得分显著相关。结论:这项纵向研究为越来越多的关于ha的社会心理益处的研究提供了有价值的证据,突出了设备使用在改善幸福感方面的潜力和局限性。结果表明,听力学家可能会考虑将社会心理支持作为综合治疗方法的一部分,而不仅仅是建议采用HA或增加使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信