发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Hastings Center Report最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Nancy S. Jecker, Zohar Lederman, and Anita Ho reply Nancy S. Jecker、Zohar Lederman 和 Anita Ho 回答。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1595
Nancy S. Jecker, Zohar Lederman, Anita Ho
{"title":"Nancy S. Jecker, Zohar Lederman, and Anita Ho reply","authors":"Nancy S. Jecker,&nbsp;Zohar Lederman,&nbsp;Anita Ho","doi":"10.1002/hast.1595","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1595","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This letter replies to the letter “Colonial and Neocolonial Barriers to Companion Digital Humans in Africa,” by Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues, in the same, May-June 2024, issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"59-60"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1595","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abigail Levin replies 阿比盖尔-莱文回复
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1597
Abigail Levin
{"title":"Abigail Levin replies","authors":"Abigail Levin","doi":"10.1002/hast.1597","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1597","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This letter responds to the letter “The Open Donor View and Procreative Beneficence,” by Daniel Groll, in the same, May-June 2024, issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"61-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1597","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care 打破二元对立：儿科性别平等护理中对女权主义生命伦理学的迫切需求》（Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care）。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1591
Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Grayson R. Jackson, Jacob D. Moses
{"title":"Breaking Binaries: The Critical Need for Feminist Bioethics in Pediatric Gender-Affirming Care","authors":"Lisa Campo-Engelstein,&nbsp;Grayson R. Jackson,&nbsp;Jacob D. Moses","doi":"10.1002/hast.1591","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1591","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?” We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"55-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Open Donor View and Procreative Beneficence 开放式捐献者观点与生育福利。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1596
Daniel Groll
{"title":"The Open Donor View and Procreative Beneficence","authors":"Daniel Groll","doi":"10.1002/hast.1596","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This letter responds to the article “What Do Prospective Parents Owe to Their Children?,” by Abigail Levin, in the March-April 2024 issue of the</i> Hastings Center Report.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"60-61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1596","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is the Aim of PEDIATRIC “Gender-Affirming” Care? 儿科 "性别确认 "护理的目的是什么？
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1583
Moti Gorin
{"title":"What Is the Aim of PEDIATRIC “Gender-Affirming” Care?","authors":"Moti Gorin","doi":"10.1002/hast.1583","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1583","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>The original “Dutch Protocol”—the treatment model comprised of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgery—was intended to improve the mental and physical health of pediatric patients experiencing distress over their sexed bodies. Consequently, both researchers and clinicians have couched eligibility for treatment and measures of treatment efficacy in terms of the interventions’ effects on outcomes such as gender dysphoria, depression, anxiety, and suicide. However, recent systematic reviews have concluded that the scientific evidence supporting these interventions is uncertain, leading to significant international differences in what treatments are offered to youth. Against this backdrop, a different argumentative approach has emerged in support of gender-affirming care. This approach appeals not to reductions in patient morbidity or mortality but to patient autonomy, where medical intervention is pursued as a means to the satisfaction of a patient's “embodiment goals.” In this article, I raise objections to autonomy-based justifications for pediatric gender-affirming care, concluding that these arguments misunderstand the place of autonomy in clinical decision-making and, consequently, put patients at risk of medical harm</i>.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"35-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1583","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contributors 贡献者
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1598
{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/hast.1598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1598","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"63-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141286969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Another Defense of Abortion: What Transplant Ethics Tells Us about the Ethics of Abortion after Dobbs 堕胎的另一种辩护：多布斯之后移植伦理对堕胎伦理的启示》。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1582
Devora Shapiro, Jeffrey Pannekoek
{"title":"Another Defense of Abortion: What Transplant Ethics Tells Us about the Ethics of Abortion after Dobbs","authors":"Devora Shapiro,&nbsp;Jeffrey Pannekoek","doi":"10.1002/hast.1582","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1582","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>In 1971, two years before</i> Roe v. Wade <i>affirmed federal protection for abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson attempted to demonstrate the wrongs of forced gestation through analogy: you awake to find that the world's most esteemed violinist is wholly, physically dependent on you for life support. Here, the authors suggest that Thomson's intuition, that there is a relevant similarity between providing living kidney support and forced gestation, is realized in the contemporary practice of living organ donation. After detailing the robust analogy between living kidney donation and gestation, we turn to current ethical guidelines incorporated in the United Network for Organ Sharing's requirements for legally authorized organ donation and transplantation. We conclude that if, as we—and Thomson—suggest, organ donation and gestation are relevantly similar, then the ethical framework supporting donation may aid in articulating ethical grounds that will be compelling in informing the legal grounds for a defense of abortion</i>.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1582","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Dead Unborn, Postmortem Privacy Cases, and Abortion Rights 死亡的未出生婴儿、死后隐私案件和堕胎权利。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1586
Anita L. Allen
{"title":"The Dead Unborn, Postmortem Privacy Cases, and Abortion Rights","authors":"Anita L. Allen","doi":"10.1002/hast.1586","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1586","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p><i>The privacy of the dead is an interesting area of concern for bioethicists. There is a legal doctrine that the dead can't have privacy rights, but also a body of contrary law ascribing privacy rights to the deceased and kin in relation to the deceased. As women's abortion privacy is under assault by American courts and legislatures, the implications of ascribing privacy rights to embryos and fetuses is more important than ever. Caution is called for in this domain</i>.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.1586","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care 性别平等护理中的价值观与证据。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1592
Os Keyes, Elizabeth A. Dietz
{"title":"Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care","authors":"Os Keyes,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Dietz","doi":"10.1002/hast.1592","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This commentary responds to the article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” by Moti Gorin, in the same issue of the journal. Gender-affirming care is often treated as exceptional and subject to heightened scrutiny. This exceptionalization results in its being held to stricter evidentiary standards than other forms of medical interventions are. But values and value judgments are inextricable from the practice of evidence-based medicine. For gender-affirming care, values shape what counts as “strong” evidence, whether the legitimacy of transgender identity is assumed versus treated as something to be investigated, how to characterize the testimonial accounts of trans and gender-nonconforming patients, and more. We argue that these kinds of questions are part of the practice of medicine, not exceptional to transgender people and gender-affirming care. However, litigation of evidence for gender-affirming care in state and national policy underscores the moral urgency of thinking carefully about what values ought to guide evidence</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"51-53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary 未成年人缺乏同意性别确认护理的自主权：必须以最大利益为先。
IF 3.3 3区 哲学
Hastings Center Report Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1600
Johan C. Bester
{"title":"Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary","authors":"Johan C. Bester","doi":"10.1002/hast.1600","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hast.1600","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>What ethically justifies the provision of invasive and irreversible treatments to minors? In this commentary, I examine this question in response to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” which critiques autonomy-based arguments for justification of gender-affirming care in minors. Minors generally lack sufficient autonomy to make significant medical decisions or major life decisions. For this reason, parents are generally their decision-makers, working with medical professionals to choose treatments that serve the best interests of the minor. Medical care in minors is justified by beneficence, not autonomy, and this should be no different for gender-affirming care. This severely undermines autonomy-based arguments for provision of gender-affirming care to minors. Given the lack of conclusive evidence for benefit, the nature of the treatment, and the fact that gender dysphoria in minors resolves spontaneously in most cases, there is presently insufficient justification for provision of such care to minors</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 3","pages":"57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141263539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信