History of Philosophy Quarterly最新文献_第9页

The Concept of Understanding and its Idealistic Interpretation in the Theoretical Philosophy of V.V. Rozanov 罗扎诺夫理论哲学中的理解概念及其唯心主义解释

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-87-98

Oleg A. Glebov

{"title":"The Concept of Understanding and its Idealistic Interpretation in the Theoretical Philosophy of V.V. Rozanov","authors":"Oleg A. Glebov","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-87-98","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-87-98","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the key provisions of Rozanov’s early theoretical treatise “On Understanding”, which is a model of Russian philosophical idealism. It shows that Rozanov’s work, which anticipated some ideas of hermeneutics and phenomenology in the 20th century, remained unnoticed within the Russian philosophical tradition. The purpose of this article is to reveal the basis of Rozanov’s thesis that the first idea of reason potentially contains all knowledge in unity. The author analyzes the following aspects of Rozanov’s work related to the problem of understanding: the motive and purpose of writing a treatise, the theme of innate ideas, the concept of vivacity of ideas, the theory of potential knowledge and its subject, the cyclical process of understanding, the difference between mind and reason, understanding from knowledge. Rozanov’s interpretation of the idea of reason, the scheme of reason, and the doctrine of number are also reconstructed. The paper concludes: the fundamental thesis of Rozanov about the embeddedness of all knowledge in the unity of the first idea of reason is justified by the primacy of the position of the idea in the taxonomy of cognitive acts. And also, by the fact that the purpose of the cognitive process pushes reason to itself.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85078926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The “Confessions of the Flesh” by M. Foucault: Towards Understanding of Methodology and Significance 福柯“肉体的自白”:对方法论和意义的理解

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-57-68

S. Gashkov

引用次数: 0

Sharp Edges of the Social Ideal (From Old Discussions to the Present) 社会理想的尖锐边缘(从旧的讨论到现在)

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-102-113

V. Porus

{"title":"Sharp Edges of the Social Ideal (From Old Discussions to the Present)","authors":"V. Porus","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-102-113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-102-113","url":null,"abstract":"The author outlines the views on social ideal of Russian thinkers from Vladimir Solovyov to Georgij Fedotov. Solovyov, advancing Fyodor Dostoevsky’s ideas, viewed the social ideal as a realization of the doctrine of universal solidarity and free development of a person under spiritual guidance of the Universal Church. This ecumenic and theocratic utopia had not received any recognition in Russian society, torn apart by unsolvable social and cultural conflicts. Pavel Novgorodtsev, generally sharing on the whole Solovyov’s views, thought that only the constitutional state could put these into effect. Konstantin Pobedonostsev pinned his hopes on monarchy, which would embrace popular religious and cultural traditions and oppose the “destructive” liberal reforms, while Nicolay Berdyaev believed in intelligentsia “transformed” by the idea of freedom. Georgij Fedotov called for the revival of the “need for freedom” and creation of the institutes executing spiritual development of society. The problem of the social ideal is relevant in modern Russia, though discredited by the neglect of cultural values, and above all, the devaluation of personal freedom. The prospect of a new cultural elite to overcome this remains vague.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81582947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Santayana, Commonsensism, and the Problem of Impervious Belief 桑塔亚那、常识论和不可渗透信仰的问题

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5406/21521026.38.1.03

R. Atkins

引用次数: 1

Farīd al-Dīn ‘Aṭṭār’s Mathnawī as Representation of Sufi Doctrine farfard al- d<e:1> n ' Aṭṭār的mathnawi是苏菲主义的代表

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-13-24

Yu. E. Fedorova

引用次数: 0

Ivan A. Ilyin: The Social Ideal of “Aristocrat of the Spirit” 伊林:“精神贵族”的社会理想

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-127-141

Anastasia V. Ugleva

引用次数: 0

The Place of Plato’s Cratylus in the Curriculum of Neoplatonic Philosophy 柏拉图的《克拉提罗斯》在新柏拉图哲学课程中的地位

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-5-12

N. Volkova

引用次数: 1

Meinong’s Theory of Assumptions 梅农的假设理论

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-62-75

D. G. Mironov

{"title":"Meinong’s Theory of Assumptions","authors":"D. G. Mironov","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-62-75","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-62-75","url":null,"abstract":"The article clarifies the reasons why A. Meinong expands the classification of mental phenomena proposed by F. Brentano and places the class of assumptions between the classes of presentations and judgments. Meinong understands acts of assumption as propositional acts, the specificity of which is that they lack the affirmative force or the moment of seriousness characteristic for acts of judgment. Meinong demonstrates the impossibility of reducing the acts of assumption to the acts of presentation on the example of negative assumptions: the negative characteristics of objects grasped in such assumptions are not captured by the presentations. It is demonstrated that the theory of modes of presentation put forward by Brentano and Marty in response to this argument of Meinong does not allow us to defend the thesis of the reducibility of assumptions to presentations: even with the help of a new notion of presentation, it is not possible to explain such phenomena as play, pretense and lies without artificial complications. The article goes on to discuss some of the details of Meinong’s semantic theory that are in need for resolving the issue of the difference between assumptions and judgments. The author points out the peculiarity of Meinong's understanding of words and sentences meanings, and gives a brief description of the theory of objectives. After the explanations made, an argument is discussed that allows Meinong to justify the difference between acts of assumption and acts of judgment. The argument is constructed as a sequential analysis of sentences, the task is to show that sentences of different types, both simple, and loaded with subordinate clauses, and composite, in different circumstances express a propositional attitude devoid of affirmative force.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74627029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Tale of Two Faculties: Heidegger's Method of Interpreting Kant 两种官能的故事:海德格尔诠释康德的方法

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5406/21521026.38.1.04

Morganna Lambeth

引用次数: 0

From the History of French Spiritualism: The Philosophy of Jules Lachelier 从法国唯心论的历史:朱尔斯·拉切利耶的哲学

History of Philosophy Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-25-38

I. Blauberg

{"title":"From the History of French Spiritualism: The Philosophy of Jules Lachelier","authors":"I. Blauberg","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-25-38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-1-25-38","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the philosophical concept of Jules Lachelier – one of the leading representatives of French spiritualism and neo-Kantianism of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Lachelier's teachings were largely associated with the ideas of his predecessors – Maine de Biran and F. Ravaisson. At the same time, it was marked by the strong influence of Kant's philosophy, which determined the originality of this form of spiritualism. Like Biran and Ravaisson, Lachelier relied on “pure psychology”, exploring the facts of consciousness, but highlighted thinking as the only ability to achieve reliable knowledge. Using the method of reflection, thanks to which thinking directly comprehends its own nature and its relationship with phenomena, Lachelier in his work “On the basis of induction” undertook the substantiation of spiritualist realism (Ravaisson's term) as a true philosophy of nature, emphasizing the importance of the law of finite causes, which explains nature and thinking. This concept was developed in the work “Psychology and Metaphysics”, which describes the process of constituting reality by thinking, a process driven by the striving of thinking for ever more complete self-realization and self-knowledge. Thus, the views of Lachelier, who followed his own theoretical path, in the late period turned out to be close to the ideas of the German post-Kantians.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77335968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1