The “Confessions of the Flesh” by M. Foucault: Towards Understanding of Methodology and Significance

Q3 Arts and Humanities
S. Gashkov
{"title":"The “Confessions of the Flesh” by M. Foucault: Towards Understanding of Methodology and Significance","authors":"S. Gashkov","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-57-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article analyzes the subject, the structure and the content elements of Michel Foucault’s posthumous “Confessions of the Flesh” (2018, Russian translation 2021). Foucault there turns to the patristic tradition (which gives some researchers a reason to talk about a “new theology”), but also proclaims the need for the unity of philosophical and philological approaches, a “lexicalization” (in the words of Philippe Chevallier). The author examines fragments on Christian chastity and the ascetic model of Cassian to demonstrate the historical and philosophical significance of Foucault’s distinctions between the ancient and Christian concepts of chastity, as well as between the “prohibitional” and “transformational” forms of asceticism.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2021-26-2-57-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author of the article analyzes the subject, the structure and the content elements of Michel Foucault’s posthumous “Confessions of the Flesh” (2018, Russian translation 2021). Foucault there turns to the patristic tradition (which gives some researchers a reason to talk about a “new theology”), but also proclaims the need for the unity of philosophical and philological approaches, a “lexicalization” (in the words of Philippe Chevallier). The author examines fragments on Christian chastity and the ascetic model of Cassian to demonstrate the historical and philosophical significance of Foucault’s distinctions between the ancient and Christian concepts of chastity, as well as between the “prohibitional” and “transformational” forms of asceticism.
福柯“肉体的自白”:对方法论和意义的理解
本文作者分析了米歇尔·福柯遗作《肉体的告白》(2018年,俄文译本2021年)的主题、结构和内容要素。福柯在那里转向教父传统(这给了一些研究者谈论“新神学”的理由),但也宣布需要哲学和语言学方法的统一,一种“词汇化”(用菲利普·谢瓦利耶的话来说)。作者考察了关于基督教贞操和卡西安的禁欲模式的片段,以证明福柯区分古代和基督教的贞操概念,以及禁欲主义的“禁止”和“转化”形式之间的历史和哲学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Philosophy Quarterly
History of Philosophy Quarterly Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信