Bruna S Mussoi, Alex Meibos, Erika Woodson, Sarah Sydlowski
{"title":"The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.","authors":"Bruna S Mussoi, Alex Meibos, Erika Woodson, Sarah Sydlowski","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2290768","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2290768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Electrode impedance measurements from cochlear implants (CI) reflect the status of the electrode array as well as the surrounding cochlear environment, and could provide a clinical index of functional changes with the CI. The goals of this study were to examine (1) the impact of electrode array type on electrode impedance, and (2) the relationship between electrode impedance and short-term hearing preservation and speech recognition outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of 115 adult hearing preservation CI recipients of a slim modiolar or slim straight array. Common ground electrode impedances, pre- and post-operative hearing thresholds and CNC word recognition scores were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electrode impedances were significantly higher for recipients of the straight electrode array. Within individuals, electrode impedances were stable after the first week post-activation. However, increased standard deviation of electrode impedances was associated with greater loss of low frequency hearing at initial activation, and with poorer speech recognition at 6 months post-implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate that electrode impedances depend on the type of implanted array. Findings also suggest that there may be a role for the variability in electrode impedance across electrodes as an indicator of changes in the intracochlear environment that contribute to outcomes with a CI.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138800515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emily R Spitzer, David M Landsberger, Alexandra J Lichtl, Susan B Waltzman
{"title":"Ceiling effects for speech perception tests in pediatric cochlear implant users.","authors":"Emily R Spitzer, David M Landsberger, Alexandra J Lichtl, Susan B Waltzman","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2271219","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2271219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ceiling effects for commonly used speech perception tests in a large population of children who received a cochlear implant (CI) before the age of four. A secondary goal was to determine the demographic factors that were relevant for predicting which children were more likely to reach ceiling level performance. We hypothesize that ceiling effects are highly prevalent for most tests.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review of children receiving a CI between 2002 and 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>165 children were included. Median scores were above ceiling levels (≥90% correct) for the majority of speech perception tests and all distributions of scores were highly skewed. Children who were implanted earlier, received two implants, and were oral communicators were more likely to reach ceiling-level performance. Age and years of CI listening experience at time of test were negatively correlated with performance, suggesting a non-random assignment of tests. Many children were re-tested on tests for which they had already scored at ceiling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Commonly used speech perception tests for children with CIs are prone to ceiling effects and may not accurately reflect how a child performs in everyday listening situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"69-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50159255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ibraheem Al-Dhamari, Rania Helal, Tougan Abdelaziz, Stephan Waldeck, Dietrich Paulus
{"title":"Automatic cochlear multimodal 3D image segmentation and analysis using atlas-model-based method.","authors":"Ibraheem Al-Dhamari, Rania Helal, Tougan Abdelaziz, Stephan Waldeck, Dietrich Paulus","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2274199","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2274199","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose an automated fast cochlear segmentation, length, and volume estimation method from clinical 3D multimodal images which has a potential role in the choice of cochlear implant type, surgery planning, and robotic surgeries.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Two datasets from different countries were used. These datasets include 219 clinical 3D images of cochlea from 3 modalities: CT, CBCT, and MR. The datasets include different ages, genders, and types of cochlear implants. We propose an atlas-model-based method for cochlear segmentation and measurement based on high-resolution <i>μ</i>CT model and <i>A</i>-value. The method was evaluated using 3D landmarks located by two experts.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> The average error was <math><mn>0.61</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.22</mn></math> mm and the average time required to process an image was <math><mn>5.21</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.93</mn></math> seconds (<i>P</i><0.001). The volume of the cochlea ranged from 73.96 mm<math><msup><mi></mi><mn>3</mn></msup></math> to 106.97 mm<math><msup><mi></mi><mn>3</mn></msup></math>, the cochlear length ranged from 36.69 to 45.91 mm at the lateral wall and from 29.12 to 39.05 mm at the organ of Corti.</p><p><p><b>Discussion:</b> We propose a method that produces nine different automated measurements of the cochlea: volume of scala tympani, volume of scala vestibuli, central lengths of the two scalae, the scala tympani lateral wall length, and the organ of Corti length in addition to three measurements related to <i>A</i>-value.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This automatic cochlear image segmentation and analysis method can help clinician process multimodal cochlear images in approximately 5 seconds using a simple computer. The proposed method is publicly available for free download as an extension for 3D Slicer software.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"46-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71434936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alexandra E Quimby, Christopher Z Wen, Michael J Ruckenstein, Jason A Brant, Douglas C Bigelow
{"title":"Caloric function as a predictor of cochlear implant performance.","authors":"Alexandra E Quimby, Christopher Z Wen, Michael J Ruckenstein, Jason A Brant, Douglas C Bigelow","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2286165","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2286165","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Changes in vestibular function have been demonstrated following cochlear implantation (CI). The functional impact of these changes on CI performance has not been well-studied. We sought to assess whether caloric changes postimplantation could predict CI performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a tertiary care hospital. Patients who underwent CI over a 22-year period (1999-2021) and had videonystagmography (VNG) testing pre- and postimplantation were included. Caloric responses were compared pre- versus post-implantation, and assessed for their ability to predict CI performance as evaluated using AzBio +10 decibels signal-to-noise ratio (dB S/N) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43 CI recipients were included. There was a significant difference in the average maximal slow-phase velocity in response to caloric irrigation in the implanted ear pre- versus post-operatively (21.2 vs. 18.5 deg/s; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Controlling for age and pre-implantation speech recognition performance, pre- and post-implantation caloric responses in the implanted ear significantly predicted CI performance at 0-6 months and >6 months post-implantation. Caloric changes following implantation were not significantly correlated with CI performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI impacts vestibular function as evidenced by changes in caloric responses. Vestibular function pre- and possibly post-CI may be clinically useful metrics for predicting some proportion of CI performance variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138464351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mahmoud M Mahrous, Ahmed A Abdelgoad, Nithreen M Said, Laila M Telmesani, Danah F Alrusayyis
{"title":"Voice acoustic characteristics of children with late-onset cochlear implantation: Correlation to auditory performance.","authors":"Mahmoud M Mahrous, Ahmed A Abdelgoad, Nithreen M Said, Laila M Telmesani, Danah F Alrusayyis","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2295159","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2295159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the voice acoustic parameters of congenitally deaf children with delayed access to sounds due to late-onset cochlear implantation and to correlate their voice characteristics with their auditory performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 84 children: a control group consisting of 50 children with normal hearing and normal speech development; and a study group consisting of 34 paediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients who had suffered profound hearing loss since birth. According to speech recognition scores and pure-tone thresholds, the study group was further subdivided into two subgroups: 24 children with excellent auditory performance and 10 children with fair auditory performance. The mean age at the time of implantation was 3.6 years for excellent auditory performance group and 3.2 years for fair auditory performance group. Voice acoustic analysis was conducted on all study participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of voice acoustic parameters revealed a statistically significant delay in both study groups in comparison to the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interestingly, in both excellent and fair performance study groups, the gap in comparison to normal hearing children was still present. While late-implanted children performed better on segmental perception (e.g. word recognition), suprasegmental perception (e.g. as demonstrated by objective acoustic voice analysis) did not progress to the same extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the suprasegmental speech performance level, objective acoustic voice measurements demonstrated a significant delay in the suprasegmental speech performance of children with late-onset CI, even those with excellent auditory performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139089312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dayse Távora-Vieira, Roberta Marino, Jafri Kuthubutheen, Christopher Broadbent, Aanand Acharya
{"title":"Decision making in bone conduction and active middle ear implants - hearing outcomes and experiences over a 10-year period.","authors":"Dayse Távora-Vieira, Roberta Marino, Jafri Kuthubutheen, Christopher Broadbent, Aanand Acharya","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2267900","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2267900","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the decision-making paradigm in the recommendations of BCI and aMEI overlapping candidacy for patients with conductive or mixed HL, and to determine if there are differences in hearing and quality of life outcomes between these implantable hearing devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from patients receiving BCI or aMEI in the past decade were analysed. Patients were grouped into: 1. BCI candidates, 2. BCI or aMEI candidates, and 3. aMEI candidates. We compared outcomes and examined the impact of BC threshold, age at implantation, and duration of hearing loss on candidacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>89 participants were included: 30 BCI, 37 aMEI, and 22 BCI or aMEI candidates. All groups performed similarly in aided sound field threshold testing. BCI group had lower speech scores in quiet compared to 'BCI or aMEI.' No significant differences were found in APHAB global scores. BC threshold, duration of hearing loss, and age at implantation had no significant effects.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Outcomes were generally similar across groups, except for higher effective gain in the aMEI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our proposed patient pathway and decision-making approach facilitate candidate selection for aMEI and BCI, aiming to optimise outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41240864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Health-related quality of life and associated developmental domains of children provided early with cochlear implants.","authors":"Vanessa Hoffmann, Stefanie Kröger, Thorsten Burger, Manfred Hintermair","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2267950","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2267950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality of life plays an important place in the psychosocial development of children with Cochlear Implants (CI). We assesd health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with CI and in hearing children and determined relationships between HRQoL and other developmental characteristics (social-emotional development, Theory of Mind (ToM), spoken language skills).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted including children with CI and hearing children. We used instruments that are widely employed and have been validated for research. At time 1 social-emotional development, ToM and spoken language skills were assessed.HRQoL was assessed using the generic KINDL questionnaire, as was social-emotional development, 2.5 years later (time 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in HRQoL between hearing children and children with CI. We show that the age of detection, the age of hearing care, and the start of early intervention are not related to HRQoL of children with CI, but relationships with some domains of social-emotional development are evident.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of targeted intervention not only to improve spoken language skills at preschool age, but also strengthen social-emotional and social-cognitive competences.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71415202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sandra L Porps, Danielle M Bennett, Jan Gilden, Kimberly Ravelo, Barbara Buck, Paul Reinhart, Robert S Hong
{"title":"Effects of an evidence-based model for cochlear implant aftercare delivery on clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.","authors":"Sandra L Porps, Danielle M Bennett, Jan Gilden, Kimberly Ravelo, Barbara Buck, Paul Reinhart, Robert S Hong","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2188007","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2188007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess an evidence-based model (EBM) approach to cochlear implant (CI) aftercare that includes a modified, reduced treatment schedule for newly-implanted adult CI recipients consisting of four appointments (initial activation, 1-, 3- and 6- months postactivation) in the first year post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective multicenter proof-of-concept study was conducted across three clinics in the United States by five experienced CI clinicians. Seventeen newly-implanted adult patients with postlingual hearing loss enrolled in the study. Hearing outcomes were measured using objective speech testing and subjective self-report measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most recipients (14/17; 82%) were able to follow the four-appointment EBM schedule. The reduced number of visits translated into an average time savings of 3 hours per patient. Significant improvements in speech perception were observed at both 3- and 6-months postactivation, as measured by CNC words in quiet and AzBio sentences at +10 dB SNR, consistent with published results achieved by traditional practices. Recipients were significantly satisfied with telephone, music, small group conversation, and television listening at 6 months postactivation. Recipient satisfaction with overall service was rated as \"excellent\" by 14/14 (100%) respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The four-appointment EBM approach delivered efficient and effective audiological aftercare to CI recipients in the first year following CI implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"325-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9117098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Complication profile in a cochlear implantation- surgical audit in a large study population of low socio-economic status in a developing country.","authors":"Sunil Mathews, K Karthikeyan, Senthil Vadivu Arumugam, Rahul Kurkure, Vijaya Krishnan Paramasivan, Mohan Kameswaran","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2233212","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14670100.2023.2233212","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To audit surgical complications and their management in cochlear implant (CI) recipients in a tertiary care referral otorhinolaryngology center in South India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hospital data on 1,250 CI surgeries performed from June 2013 to December 2020 was reviewed. This is an analytical study with data collected from medical records. The demographic details, complications, management protocols and relevant literature were reviewed. Patients were divided into the following five age groups: 0-3 years, 3-6 years, 6-13 years, 13-18 years and above 18 years. Complications were divided into major and minor and complication occurrence was divided into peri-operative, early post-operative, and late post-operative, and the results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall major complication rate was 9.04% (including 6.0% due to device failure). If the device failure rate was excluded, the major complication rate was 3.04%. The minor complication rate was 6%.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CI is the gold standard in the management of patients with severe to profound hearing loss with minimal benefit from conventional hearing aids. Experienced tertiary care CI referral and teaching centers manage complicated implantation cases. Such centers typically audit their surgical complications, providing important reference data for young implant surgeons and newer centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not bereft of complications, the list of complications and its prevalence is sufficiently low to warrant the advocacy of CI worldwide, including developing countries with low socio-economic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9767541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}