Long-term experience with biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2024.2379124
Dragana Mitovska Fenov, Rolf Salcher, Eugen Kludt, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Jennifer Harre, Thomas Lenarz, Anja Giesemann, Athanasia Warnecke
{"title":"Long-term experience with biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration.","authors":"Dragana Mitovska Fenov, Rolf Salcher, Eugen Kludt, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Jennifer Harre, Thomas Lenarz, Anja Giesemann, Athanasia Warnecke","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2379124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The implantation of biohybrid electrodes was introduced a few years ago in our clinic. These electrodes coated with autologous mononuclear cells releasing anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors are thought to reduce insertion trauma and maintain the vitality of surviving spiral ganglion neurons. The clinical feasibility of this approach has already been demonstrated. In the present retrospective study, the four-year results of the two sides (classical electrode and biohybrid electrode) in the bilaterally implanted patients were compared in order to investigate possible adverse long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients received a complete audiological diagnosis which also included a speech audiogram and impedance measurement. The measurements were carried out 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4 years after implantation. The hearing results were assessed by pure tone audiometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients showed satisfactory speech understanding and similar impedances on both sides although they had a long-term deafness before implantation of the side provided with a biohybrid electrode array. The results of speech understanding and impedance measurements were stable for years. Cone beam computed tomography was performed in 4 patients three years after implantation and could rule out cochlear ossification. Other complications were also not registered in any of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to satisfactory outcomes and lack of complications, the biohybrid electrode is considered to be a safe option in cochlear implantation. The simplicity of application of autologous cells as a source of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors via a biohybrid electrode array is a key step for cell-based, regenerative therapies for deafness.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"171-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2379124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The implantation of biohybrid electrodes was introduced a few years ago in our clinic. These electrodes coated with autologous mononuclear cells releasing anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors are thought to reduce insertion trauma and maintain the vitality of surviving spiral ganglion neurons. The clinical feasibility of this approach has already been demonstrated. In the present retrospective study, the four-year results of the two sides (classical electrode and biohybrid electrode) in the bilaterally implanted patients were compared in order to investigate possible adverse long-term effects.

Methods: All patients received a complete audiological diagnosis which also included a speech audiogram and impedance measurement. The measurements were carried out 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4 years after implantation. The hearing results were assessed by pure tone audiometry.

Results: All patients showed satisfactory speech understanding and similar impedances on both sides although they had a long-term deafness before implantation of the side provided with a biohybrid electrode array. The results of speech understanding and impedance measurements were stable for years. Cone beam computed tomography was performed in 4 patients three years after implantation and could rule out cochlear ossification. Other complications were also not registered in any of the patients.

Conclusion: Due to satisfactory outcomes and lack of complications, the biohybrid electrode is considered to be a safe option in cochlear implantation. The simplicity of application of autologous cells as a source of anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective factors via a biohybrid electrode array is a key step for cell-based, regenerative therapies for deafness.

生物混合人工耳蜗在人类神经感觉恢复方面的长期经验。
目的:几年前,我们在临床上引入了生物混合电极植入术。这些电极涂有释放抗炎和神经保护因子的自体单核细胞,被认为可以减少插入创伤,维持存活的螺旋神经节神经元的活力。这种方法的临床可行性已经得到证实。在本回顾性研究中,比较了双侧植入患者两侧(传统电极和生物混合电极)四年的效果,以调查可能的长期不良影响:所有患者都接受了全面的听力诊断,包括语言听力图和阻抗测量。测量分别在植入后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、1 年、2 年、3 年和 4 年进行。听力结果通过纯音测听进行评估:结果:所有患者的言语理解能力都令人满意,两侧阻抗相似,尽管他们在植入生物混合电极阵列的一侧之前长期耳聋。言语理解能力和阻抗测量结果多年来一直保持稳定。4 名患者在植入三年后接受了锥形束计算机断层扫描,排除了耳蜗骨化的可能。所有患者均未出现其他并发症:结论:由于效果令人满意且无并发症,生物杂交电极被认为是人工耳蜗植入的安全选择。通过生物杂交电极阵列简单应用自体细胞作为抗炎和神经保护因子的来源,是基于细胞的耳聋再生疗法的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信