Jan-Erik Refle, Adela Sanela Elezovic, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Yves Jackson
{"title":"Non-State Regulators? Civil Society as Extension of the State in a Context of a Regularization Scheme for Undocumented Migrants","authors":"Jan-Erik Refle, Adela Sanela Elezovic, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Yves Jackson","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>“Opération Papyrus” was implemented in the Swiss Canton of Geneva between 2017 and 2018 with the aim of granting residence permits to undocumented migrants who met pre-established criteria. This program serves as an exemplary case of involving nongovernmental actors to facilitate what were originally state-controlled procedures. Civil society organizations (CSOs) exercised discretionary power and played a pivotal role in negotiating the program's design and acting as gatekeepers, ensuring that only eligible individuals applied, thereby reducing the administrative workload. Our paper primarily focuses on the unique role played by civil society organizations, extending the reach of the state, as they acted independently as regulators and maintained proximity to the individuals involved, enhancing the program's effectiveness. The analysis is based on 10 retrospective interviews with cantonal and federal civil servants and representatives from CSOs, supplemented with additional official documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Continuities in Policies and Turnover Among Actors: Instrument Constituencies in French Primary Care Reforms","authors":"Noémie Morize","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, the concept of “instrument constituency” has been proposed as a way in which to bridge studies on policy networks and policy instruments. This concept focuses on policy networks composed of diverse actors who are brought together by the shared goal of promoting a specific instrument. In this study, we examine who is involved in policy instruments development, and the extent to which they drive change within the policy process. To do so, we focus on the case of two care coordination instruments, namely, the IPEP and PEPS, used in the French healthcare system. Drawing on qualitative methods, we identify the actors involved in the development of the two instruments. Our analysis reveals the formation of two instrument constituencies around the IPEP and PEPS. This finding suggests that the continuity of primary care policies is supported through these instruments, fostering shared approaches among the actors involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147275036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Policy Entrepreneurs and the Design of Administrative Reform: A Conceptual Framework and the Israeli Case","authors":"Nissim Cohen","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>What is the role of policy entrepreneurs in promoting the design of public administrative reform? We present a conceptual framework for assessing the influence of policy entrepreneurs on public administrative reform. We start by proposing a typology of the various policy entrepreneurs active in the administrative reform arena. We then analyze the unique political and institutional obstacles to reform and the motivations and strategies of local players for overcoming them. Finally, we test the framework using textual analysis and in-depth interviews with Israeli politicians, senior bureaucrats and nongovernmental officials about the 2013–2018 attempt to reform Israel's civil service. We also discuss the need to test the theoretical aspects of this framework in other contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On the Applicability of the Advocacy Coalition Framework for Analyzing EU Policy Processes","authors":"Fredrik von Malmborg","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Initially developed for the US context, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is increasingly used to analyze policy processes in the EU. But policymaking in EU differs from the US context, why the applicability of ACF in the EU context should be scrutinized. This paper discusses limitations of ACF for analyzing supranational EU policy processes. Policymaking in EU is mainly about collaboration and competition of organizations. Thus, the central concept of ACF—individual <i>beliefs</i>—is difficult to apply. Organizations have cultures, not beliefs. The formal path to policy change in EU is negotiations to reach consensus. These take place in different modes, affecting policy learning. If systems boundaries are adapted to EU governance, organizations are given more attention, and ACF theories are developed to better explain negotiations and policy learning, ACF can complement macro-level studies of European integration with meso-level perspectives to better explain policy change in EU.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146256516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Role of European Union (EU) Metagovernance in Supporting the Voluntary and Community Sector in Northern Ireland","authors":"Giada Lagana, Sioned Pearce","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article argues that European Union (EU) peacebuilding scholarship can benefit from organizational research on the socio-spatial dynamics of policy implementation. It introduces a strategic-relational heuristic to address two key gaps: the marginalization of grassroots agency in spatial analyses and the separation of strategy from structure. Drawing on the Strategic-Relational Approach (SRA), the paper examines EU peacebuilding as a form of metagovernance. Using Northern Ireland as a case study, it shows how voluntary and community groups not only respond to but also shape metagovernance as an opportunity structure. Key dimensions—geographic reach, thematic focus, governance mechanisms, and spatial elements like territory, place, scale, and networks—are central to this process. Yet, persistent shortcomings reveal tensions where policy and politics intertwine. The article concludes that metagoverning peacebuilding is a dynamic, context-specific process shaped by diverse actor strategies and overlapping territorial influences, requiring an understanding of both strategic tools and opportunity structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karin Ingold, Manuel Fischer, Rahel Freiburghaus, Daniel Nohrstedt, Adrian Vatter
{"title":"How Patterns of Democracy Impact Policy Processes: When Lijphart and Sabatier Meet","authors":"Karin Ingold, Manuel Fischer, Rahel Freiburghaus, Daniel Nohrstedt, Adrian Vatter","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70006","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Policy process theories and institutional theories are two foundational strands in political science, both concerned with how people engage in politics. However, they differ in their focus, with policy process theories emphasizing the roles of actors, while institutional theories concentrate on the structures in which these actors are embedded. This paper bridges these two previously isolated strands, exploring how macro-institutions influence policy processes. Specifically, we investigated how political institutions, such as decentralization and corporatism, relate to coalition opportunity structures (COSs), a key concept within the advocacy coalition framework (ACF); we also investigated the role of minority coalitions and subsystem collaboration. Empirically, we based our analysis on prototypes selected according to Aranda Lijphart's models of majoritarian and consensus democracies. Drawing on existing comparative ACF applications related to climate, water, and energy policy processes, we compared results from these studies to assess the impact of institutional settings on coalition dynamics. Our findings suggest that minority coalitions are more present—and sometimes more influential—in federalist than in unitary countries and that corporatism has a greater effect on collaboration within policy subsystems than consensualism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"11 2","pages":"254-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Policy Entrepreneur as a Crosscutting Concept in Theories of the Policy Process: A Scoping Review of European Empirical Applications","authors":"Evangelia Petridou, Jörgen Sparf, Nikolaos Zahariadis","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we examine concepts that underpin the theories of the policy process. We exemplify the applicability of these concepts in the European policy-making contexts through a systematic scoping review of European applications of the policy entrepreneur. Our findings include that (i) the overwhelming majority of the studies anchored the policy entrepreneur in the Multiple Streams Framework; (ii) more than half of the studies were contextualized at the EU level and in the UK country context; (iii) policy entrepreneurs were identified in a wide range of policy sectors, and (iv) policy entrepreneurs were identified as being individuals as well as organizations but mostly elite actors, often policy-makers. Future avenues for research include policy entrepreneurship in political parties, exploring the interactions of policy entrepreneurs and the role their other identities (public servant, elected official, NGO official, etc.) play in how reactive or proactive they are in seeking opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"11 2","pages":"191-206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A consensus model in legislative decision-making: The council of the European Union","authors":"Arash Pourebrahimi","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The culture of consensus influences legislative decision-making within the Council of the European Union, often leading to broad coalitions in which even the preferences of isolated member states are considered. Nevertheless, despite its significance, this culture has been insufficiently studied through formal models predicting EU legislative outcomes. This paper presents the Consensus model, a mixture of the procedural and bargaining approaches, accounting for the culture of consensus. This iterative model starts from the Commission's ideal stance and persists until no member state challenges a policy position, which then becomes the adopted outcome. The European Parliament contributes to shaping the trajectory from the Commission's proposal to the final result. Using the DEU-III data set, I assess the Consensus model's predictive ability, demonstrating its superior performance compared to two random outcome models. Notably, the Consensus model performs on par with the Nash bargaining model.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146680465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Power Relations in the Preparation of the Nondiscrimination Act: The Controversial Issue of Supervising Discrimination in Working Life","authors":"Laura Jauhola, Kati Rantala","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of Europeanisation and neo-corporatism, we examine the lengthy process of revising the Nondiscrimination Act in Finland, spanning from 2007 to 2023. The focus is on the mandate of the Nondiscrimination Ombudsman in the workplace and on explaining the sudden policy change of strengthening it after a prolonged standstill. The study employs the Advocacy Coalition Framework, especially the approach of Coalition Opportunity Structures, combined with path dependency in relation to legal frames, in examining the struggle between the labour policy coalition and the coalition of human rights advocates. The case exemplifies the intertwining of legal, institutional, and political structures as strategic means and necessary precursors to policy change, which was a breakthrough for the human rights advocates. Yet the ultimate decisive factor was the political landscape, which reminds us of the inherently political nature of national-level lawmaking, further supported by the erosion of tripartite lawmaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147280952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Policy process theory development: Perspectives from European junior scholars","authors":"Sandra Plümer, Malte Möck, Hilda Broqvist","doi":"10.1002/epa2.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of policy process theories is progressing rapidly. Scholars increasingly apply these theories originated in the US to different contexts and continents, such as Europe. Furthermore, scholars at different career stages, including junior scholars, work on and with these theories. Focusing on junior scholars, this paper poses the following question: What are the key considerations of European junior scholars engaging in policy process theory development? We present three observations: The first observation refers to the general construction of a research project contributing to theory development. The second observation investigates how teaching policy process research and public policy, in general, can advance theory development. The third observation focuses on how to bridge the science-practice gap as a junior scholar working on policy process theories. The three observations highlight the potential of making use of your own agency as a junior scholar engaging in policy process theory development in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":"11 2","pages":"271-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144135488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}